Articles

Home About What's New Arakan Politics Economy Social My Files Favorite Links Articles News Photos My Photos PostBag My Slide Show Guest Book Contact



Articles

  The Great Image

MahaMratMuniShirne 

About Arakanese Chronology

Cultural and Religious Relation Between India and Dhanyawady

U Shwe Zan, B.Sc, Bcs

    The places like Lumbni-Nepal, Bodh-Gaya Northen India, Samath, Varanasi-U.P. and Kushinagar U.P. are the four noteworthy location, where Gautama Budda was born, gained enlightenment, preached his first sermon and at the age of 80 attained Nibbana indeed! These are the most sacred places in Nepal and India.

    From the ancient Rakhinr (Arakan) historical point of view. grandfather of Gutama Budha Einzana (from his maternal side), altered the Ancient Kokethamin Era 8645 to 2 and the out coming era was called Maha Era  or Einzana Era, Rakhine King Ralamaru, 24th in the line of Kanrazagri or Kamaraza, founder of second Dhanyawady, also favoueed the alteration made by Eizana in that Era Gautama Buddha was born Maha (543 BC), renounced enlightenment in 103 Maha (537 BC) and passed to Nibbana in 148 Maha (492 BC). We learned from an article entitled "Review of the most ancient scholar of the most Rakhine History, U Sein Nyo Tun, I.C.S.(Retd), that Candathurira, the founder of Dhanyawadi, was also born in 72 Maha (563 BC) as cended to the Rakhine throne in 97 Maha or new religious Era (491 BC). One year after the Gautama Buddha and Candathuria were contemporary to each other. Moreover, we also learned that Guatama Buddha visited to Dhanyawady and preached King Candathurira in 123 Maha (517 BC), after the 20th monsoon retreat. At the same date, King Candathurira had cast a bronze image of Mahamuni (Christian dating system in use here is accoedence with the Vikran Sambat that, for about forty-five yeas, Buddha and his disciples traveled from place to place (withen Majjhima), preaching to people of all works of life and the greatest King of the time favoured him and his diciples.

    Incident of Buddha and Candathurira, King of Dhanyawadi: Dr.Forchhmmer a renowned archaeologist wrote in his Book entitled 'ARAKAN' about the history of Mahamuni Shrine and the Sappadanapakarana, an ancient Rakhine manuscript of great value.

    According to this manuscript, Buddha with 500 disciples came to Dhanyawady by aerial journey while sojourning in Dhanyawady, during Candathurira rule in 554 BC (revised 517 BC). The blessed one compiled with King"s request for permission of casting an image of the teacher. The King as well as his subjects offered "Nine Kuti" worth of precious metal and in the presence of the Buddha Mahamuni, the exact likeness of the Buddha was cast.

    In the 15th centuary Ayecham verse by Adoo Mon Nyo (a court bard of King Ba Saw Pru, 1459-1482 AD0 the casinh of image is described thus;-

    By the help of Visukarma

    The divine creative genius

    It was wrouth-

    The present Mahamuni,

    When the hollow of the hang

    The Master gave

    Exactly seven times

    The precious mentals

    With the warmth of His Boson

    And behold

    The likeness of

    The master appeared

    To be revered by Brahma,

    Devas and men

    The gift of the purest

    Of all hearts"

    In time, the Mahamuni became renowned and pilgrima from far-off paid regular visits. This Mahamuni image has been takenaway from the soil of its origin and now enshrined at Mandalay still receives sacred all egiance from milliona of South-East Asia Buddha.

    The History of Dhayawady (Rakkha Pura) as foretold by Guatama Buddha; Gautama Buddha visted Dhanyawady with the object of his Sasana as well as his image, for the foresaw that the Sasana would get lost in India after his passing to Nibana. On arrival Thayla Giri, Kyawk Taw Hill, Gautama Buddhas related to Ananda, the history of the Rakhine Kingdom, in order that he may know in what kind of a country. He was leaving his Sasana as well as his image.

Comment: Some are of the opinion that Majjhima ends at Rakhine Yoma. Since, after sojourning in Dhayawady, Gautama Buddha proceeded as far as Tan-Gyi-Taung, the east bank of the Irrawaddy (Ayeyawady) River, and from where pre dicted that the Tharay-Khattara Kingdom will be formed in the opposit bank in the future. We have no assume that Majjhima ends in the west bank of the Irrawady (Ayeyawady) River.

    Once Dr.Than Tun, M.A, BL, Ph D, remarked in his book entitled "An old History of Burma (Myanmar)", that Gautama Buddha had never been to outside Majjhma. It may be true and we can accept his remarked, but we should bear in mind that in ancient days, since Dhayady was included in the Majjhima. We can accept our traditiuonal belief of Gautama Buddha's visitation to Dhanyawady with clear conscious.

Reference

1. Antony Spaetu-A question of faith  TIME may 26,1997 pp 42-48

2. Baneji, R.D. AJunior History of India (Blackic & Son India) Ltd.

3. Forchhmmer, Dr- "ARAKAN' " Mahamuni Shrine and the Sappadanapaka-rana Manascript."

4. Mayda Pinnya- 8th Century Mayda Pinnya Verse

5. Sein Nyo Tun, U I.C.S Retd-Review of the most ancient Rakhine History & History of Rakhine as foretold by Gautama Buddha, May 1966.

6. Shwe Zan,U- The Golden Mrauk-U, an ancient capital of Rakhine, 00 154-155.

7. Than Tun, Dr. M.A. BL.,Ph D- An old History of Burma, 1969

Rakhine people

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arakanese), an ethnicThe Rakhine people (Burmese: &cdkifvlrsKd;; MLCTS: ra. khaing lu. myo:; IPA: [ja̰kʰàin lùmjóʊ]; formerly group of Myanmar, are today recognised as a national race by the Burmese military government, and they form the majority along Rakhine State's coastal regions. They possibly constitute 4% or more of Myanmar's population but no accurate census figures exist.

Contents

 Etymology

According to the Arakanese chronicles, the name Rakhaing (Rakhine) was originated from Pali word Rakhapura meaning the land of the people of Rakhasa (Rakhasa > Rakkha >Rakhaing) who were titled this name in honour of preservation on their national heritage (a myo) and ethics or morality (sila).The word Rakhaing means, "one who keeps his own race." They are a strong and proud Buddhist people and claim to be one of the first groups to become followers of the Buddha in Southeast Asia.

Culture

The Rakhine are culturally different from the Bamar. They speak a language related to but different from Burmese. One major variation is the language's retention of the /r/ sound, which is a /j/ sound in Burmese. In addition, the Rakhine language, although mutually intelligible with standard Burmese, has certain differences in vocabulary. The Rakhine are predominantly Buddhists. One major reason for the cultural differences between the dominant Bamar and the Rakhine is their geographical isolation due to the Arakan Yoma. The Rakhine have been influenced by Indian culture, and traces of Indian influence remain in many aspects of Rakhine culture, including its literature, music, and cuisine.

History

The people of Rakhine claim a history that began in 3325 B.C and also archaeological evidence has been found to support this claim. The first independent Arakan kingdom was established in 3325 B.C by King Marayu. Buddhism was introduced into Arakan during the lifetime of Buddha himself. According to Rakhine chronicles, Lord Buddha in his life time visited the city of Dhannyawadi (Grain Blessed) in 554 B.C. The Rakhine king Sandar Suriya (Sun Moon) requested Lord Buddha to leave the image of Himself. After casting the Great Image Maha Muni (Great Sage) Lord Buddha breathed upon it which resembled the exact likeness of the Blessed One.

Ancient Dhannyawadi Lying, west of the ridge between the Kaladan and Lc-mro riv­ers. Dhannyawadi could be reached by small boat from the Kaladan Via the its tributary, the Tharechaung. Its city walls were made of brick, and form an irregular circle with a perimeter of about 9.6 kilometres, enclosing an area of about 4.42 square kilometres. Beyond the walls, the remains of a wide moat, now silted over and covered by paddy fields, are still visible in places. The re­mains of brick fortifications can be seen along the hilly ridge which provided protection from the west. Within the city, a similar wall and moat enclose the palace site, which has an area of 0.26 square kilometres, and another wall surrounds the palace itself.

At times of insecurity, when the city was subject to raids from the hill tribes or attempted invasions from neigh­bouring powers, there would have been an assured food supply enabling the population to withstand a siege. The city would have controlled the valley and the lower ridges, supporting a mixed wet-rice and taungya (slash and burn) economy, with local chiefs paying allegiance to the king.

From aerial photographs we can discern Dhannyawadi's irri­gation channels and storage tanks, centred at the palace site. Throughout the history of Arakan, and indeed the rest of early Southeast Asia, the king's power stemmed from his control of irrigation and water storage systems to conserve the monsoon rains and therefore to maintain the fertility and prosperity of the land. In ceremonies conducted by Indian Brahmins the king was given the magic power to regulate the celestial and terrestrial forces in order to control the coming of the rains which would ensure the continuing prosperity of the kingdom.

 Historical periods

PeriodYearsRulerNotes
Dhanyawady - BC. 3325 - AD. 326
The First DhanyawadyBC. 3325 - 1483King Marayu 
The Second DhanyawadyBC. 1483 - 580King Kanrazagree 
The Third DhanyawadyBC. 580 - AD. 326King Chandra SuriyaGautama Buddha, Himself, visited Dhanyawady and the Great Image of Mahamuni was casted, and Buddhism began professed in Arakan. Currency system by coinage is said introduced in Arakan economy.
Vesali - Lemro - AD. 327 - 1430
Vesali Kyauk HlaygaAD. 327 - 794King Dvan Chandra 
SambawakAD. 794- 818Prince Nga Tong Mong (Saw Shwe Lu) 
LemroAD. 818 -1430King Nga Tone MunThis period was the highest civilization in the Bay and highly prosperous with busy international trade with the west. Pyinsa, Purain, Taung Ngu and Narinsara, Laungkrat cities were flourished and gold and silver coinage was used in trade relation in Arakan in this period.
Golden Mrauk-U - 1430 - 1784
First Golden Mrauk-U1430 - 1530King Mun Saw Mwan 
Second Golden Mrauk-U1530 - 1638Solidified by King Mun Bun (Mun Ba Gri)Arakan reached at the zenith of the national unity and of the time of most powerful in the Bay in this period.
Third Golden Mrauk-U Period1638 - 1784King Mahathamada Raza 

The oldest artefact, stone image of Fat Monk inscribed "Saccakaparibajaka Jina" in Brahmi inscription comes to the date of first century A.D.

An ancient stone inscription in Nagari character was discovered by renowned Archaeologist Dr. Forchhammer. Known as Salagiri, this hill was where the great teacher came to Arakan some two thousand five hundred years ago. Somewhere from eastern part of this hill, a stone image in Dhamma-cakra-mudra now kept in Mrauk-U museum, was found earlier in 1923. This relief sculpture found on the Salagiri Hill represents Buddha preaching King Canda Suriya belongs to 4th century A.D.; five more red sandstone slabs with the carving were found close by the south of this Salagiri Hill in 1986. They are the same type as the single slab found earlier in 1923. These carving slabs of Bhumispara-mudra, Kararuna-mudra, Dhammacakra-mudara, and Mmahaparinibbana-mudra represent the life of Buddha.

These sculptures provide earliest evident about the advent of Buddhism into Arakan; during the life time of the Buddha and these discoveries were therefore assumed as the figures of King Canda Suriya of Dyanawady, who dedicated the Great Maha Muni Image. These archaeological findings have been studied by eminent scholars and conclusion is that the Maha Muni was made during the king Sanda Suriya era.

The founder of Vesali city, King Dvan Chandra carved Vesali Paragri Buddha-image in 327 A.D and set a dedicatory inscription in Pali verse

"ye dhamma hetuppabuava / Tathagato aha / tesan ca yo niyodho / evamvadi Mahasamano."

That Buddha-image is carved out by a single block and the earliest image of Vesali.

The meaning of Ye Dhamma verse is as follow.

"

Of these dhammas which arise from causes / The Tathagata has declared causes / Lord Buddha preached about the causes / And the effects gained by the causes / And that which is the ceasing of them, Nirawda Thitesa / This the great ascetic declares.

"

The verse, which is considered as the essence of Theravada spirit, bears testimony to the fact that Buddhism flourished to an utmost degree in Vesali. The relationship of Vesali with foreign countries especially Ceylon would be established for Buddhism.

The stone inscriptions are of Sanskrit, Pali, Rakhine, Pru and Arabic languages. Anandacandra Inscriptions date back to 729 A.D. originally from Vesali now preserved at Shitethaung indicates adequate evidence for the earliest foundation of Buddhism. Dr. E. H. Johnston's analysis reveals a list of kings which he considered reliable beginning from Candra dynasty. The western face inscription has 72 lines of text recorded in 51 verses describing the Anandacandra's ancestral rulers. Each face recorded the name and ruling period of each king who were believed to have ruled over the land before Anandacandra. Archaeology has shown that the establishment of so many stone pagodas and inscriptions which have been totally neglected for centuries in different part of Arakan speak of popular favoured by Buddhism.

The cubic stone inscriptions record the peace making between the governor of Thandaway Mong Khari (1433-1459) and Razadhiraj the Mon Emperor in Arakanese inscription. This was found from a garrison hill at the oldest site of Parein. A stone slab with the alleged figure of the Buddha preaching, King Canda Suriya bored testimony to the Salagiri tradition, depicting of the advent of the Teacher to Dyanyawaddy.

The crowing event in the history of Arakan was the Convention of the Buddhist Council at the top of golden hill of Vesali under the royal patronage of King Dhammawizaya in 638 AD. through joint effort of two countries, Arakan and Ceylon. This momentous triumph of the great council was participated by one thousand monks from Ceylon and one thousand monks from Arakan kingdom. As a fitting celebration of the occasion, the lavish construction of pagodas, statues and monasteries were undertaken for the purpose of inscribing the Tripitaka. After Vesali, Pyinsa was found by Lemro dynasty in 818 A.D; the great king of dynasty (AD. 818 -1430) was King Mim-Yin-Phru, who turned his attention towards the development of Buddhism, and in 847 A.D. he conveyed the second Buddhist council in Arakan attended by 800 Arahants. Arakanese chronicles report that therein the Tripitaka and Atthakatha were inscribed on the golden plate and enshrined. Never has there been impediment in the practice of Theravada Buddhist faith since it has introduced in Arakan. The copious findings of inscription Ye Dhamma verse were practical evidence that Theravada was dominant faith if epigraphic and archaeological sources were to be believed. The Royal patronage has always been significant factor contribution to stability and progress of the religion in Arakan.

The country had been invaded several times, by the Mongols, Mon, Bamar and Portuguese and finally the Bamar in 1785 when the armies led by the Crown Prince, son of King Bodawpaya, of the Konbaung dynasty of Burma marched across the western Yoma and annexed Arakan. The religious relics of the kingdom were stolen from Rakhine, most notably the Mahamuni Buddha image, and taken into central Burma where they remain today. The people of Arakan resisted the conquest of the kingdom for decades after. Fighting with the Rakhine resistance, initially led by Nga Than Dè and finally by Chin Byan in border areas, created problems between British India and Burma. The year 1826 saw the defeat of the Bamar in the First Anglo-Burmese War and Arakan was ceded to Britain under the Treaty of Yandabo. Akyab (Sittwe) was then designated the new capital of Arakan. In 1852, Arakan was merged into Lower Burma as a territorial division.

During the Second World War, Arakan was given autonomy under the Japanese occupation and was even granted its own army known as the Arakan Defense Force. The Arakan Defense Force went over to the allies and turned against the Japanese in early 1945. After the war, Arakan was the centre of multiple insurgencies which fought against British rule, notably led by the monks U Ottama and U Seinda.

In 1948, Arakan became independent as a division within the Union of Burma. Shortly after, violence broke out along religious lines between Buddhists and Muslims. Later there were calls for secession by the Rakhine, but such attempts were subdued. In 1974, the Ne Win government's new constitution granted Rakhine Division "state" status but the gesture was largely seen as meaningless since the military junta held all power in the country and in Rakhine. In 1989, the name of Arakan State was changed to "Rakhine" by the military junta.

List of Arakan Kings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

The folowing is a list of the Kingship (including mythological) of the Arakan .

 Mytholog

Dhynygawati-The First Dynasty

  • Marayo............................................2666-2604 BC
  • Maradzi I.........................................2604-2572
  • Maraonleng........................................2572-2519
  • Mararwayleng......................................2519-2471
  • Marabengh.........................................2471-2416
  • Maradzi II........................................2416-2383
  • Marakeng..........................................2383-2351
  • Ngatshapo (usurper)...............................2351-2330
  • Dwaratsandra......................................2330-2290
  • Tholatsandra......................................2290-2257
  • Tsandathuriyatsandra..............................2257-2220
  • Kalatsandra.......................................2220-2180
  • Titsandra.........................................2180-2149
  • Madhuthatsandra...................................2149-2129
  • Dzeyatsandra......................................2129-2089
  • Mokkhatsandra.....................................2089-2063
  • Gunnatsandra......................................2063-2051
  • 3 noble usurpers...7 days, 3 months, and 8 months respectively
  • Kan-Radzagyi......................................2050-2009
  • Kan-Radzangai.....................................2009-1973
  • Indathuriya.......................................1973-1938
  • Athurindathuriya..................................1938-1908
  • Tharameta.........................................1908-1880
  • Thuriya...........................................1880-1849
  • Mengthi...........................................1849-1827
  • Mengba............................................1827-1805
  • Tsioung...........................................1805-1777
  • Tataingtheng......................................1777-1746
  • Kyaukhoungweng....................................1746-1715
  • Thuriyanandamit...................................1715-1694
  • Athurindabhaya....................................1694-1663
  • Letyatsithukyi....................................1663-1631
  • Thihaka...........................................1631-1588
  • Mengbhunthan......................................1588-1557
  • Tharethmwe........................................1557-1508
  • Dzeyanandathu.....................................1508-1457
  • Tekkathu..........................................1457-1411
  • Lekkhana..........................................1411-1374
  • Gunnarit..........................................1374-1326
  • Thiwarit..........................................1326-1285
  • Menghlahmwe.......................................1285-1254
  • Marinda...........................................1254-1192
  • Thidhatkummara....................................1192-1170
  • Menghlakyi........................................1170-1123
  • Menghlangay.......................................1123-1099
  • Ngatsarit.........................................1099-1061
  • Myethnawun........................................1061-1030
  • Letthutkyi........................................1030-1003
  • Thirikammathunda..................................1003-972
  • Nandakotabhaya.....................................972-945
  • Mengnanhpyu........................................945-925
  • Mengmanu...........................................925-897
  • Mengkhoungngay.....................................897-878
  • Loukkhoungradza....................................878-838
  • Mengngaypyauhlatsi.................................838-832
  • 3 nobles, usurpers of the crown....................

 Dhingyawati-The Second Dynasty

  • Kan-Radzagyi.......................................825-788
  • Thila-Radza........................................788-740
  • Watsathura.........................................740-709
  • Nandawithura.......................................709-669
  • Punathuriya........................................669-637
  • Thuranda...........................................637-614
  • Tsandima...........................................614-577
  • Thiritsanda........................................577-537
  • Thiharan...........................................537-491
  • Thihanu............................................491-471
  • Payaka.............................................471-440
  • Nelagun............................................440-399
  • Rohahagun..........................................399-368
  • Thirigun...........................................368-344
  • Thamadza...........................................344-309
  • Kummara............................................309-289
  • Thekhtenghypu......................................289-249
  • Thabhengu..........................................249-207
  • Tedzawun...........................................207-171
  • Mundzayaba.........................................171-137
  • Kummarawithuddhi...................................137-50
  • Wathumundala........................................50-16
  • Thurinda........................................16 BCE-15 CE
  • Ralamayu............................................15-37
  • Nalamayu............................................37-68
  • Wadhagun............................................68-90
  • Withuradza..........................................90-111
  • Thiriradza.........................................111-146
  • Acceptance of Budhism
  • Tsandathuriya......................................146-198
  • Thuriyaditi........................................198-245
  • Thuriyapatipat.....................................245-298
  • Thuriyarupa........................................298-313
  • Thuriyamandala.....................................313-375
  • Thuriyawanna.......................................375-418
  • Thuriyanatha.......................................418-459
  • Thuriyawengtha.....................................459-468
  • Thuriyabanda.......................................468-474
  • Thuriyakalyana.....................................474-492
  • Thuriyamukkha......................................493-513
  • Thuriyatedza.......................................513-544
  • Thuriyapunya.......................................544-552
  • Thuriyakula........................................552-575
  • Thuriyapabas.......................................575-600
  • Thuriyatsitra......................................600-618
  • Thuriyathetha......................................618-640
  • Thuriyawimala......................................640-648
  • Thuriyarenu........................................648-670
  • Thuriyagengtha.....................................670-686
  • Thuriyathekya......................................686-694
  • Thuriyathiri.......................................694-714
  • Thuriyakethi.......................................714-723
  • Thuriyakutta.......................................723-746
  • Thuriyaketu........................................746-788

 Historical 

 First historical dynasty

  • 3 unknown kings......................................120 years each
  • Bahubalin............................................120 years
  • Raghupati............................................120 years
  • unknown king.........................................120 years
  • Candrodaya............................................27 years
  • The Annaveta kings (unknown number)....................5 years
  • unknown king..........................................77 years
  • Rimbhyappa ? .........................................23 years
  • Kuvera(mi) (fem.).......................................5 years
  • Umavirya ? ............................................7 years
  • Lanki..................................................2 years 

Candra dynasty

  • Dvencandra................................... c.330/60-c. 385/415
  • Rajacandra..................................c. 385/415-c. 405/35
  • Kalacandra...................................c. 405/35-c. 414/44
  • Devacandra...................................c. 414/44-c. 436/66
  • Yajñacandra..................................c. 436/66-c. 443/73
  • Candrabandhu.................................c. 443/73-c. 449/79
  • Bhumicandra..................................c. 449/79-c. 456/86
  • Bhuticandra..................................c. 456/86-c. 480/510
  • Niticandra..................................c. 480/510-c. 535/65
  • Viryacandra..................................c. 535/65-c. 538/68
  • Prithicandra.................................c. 538/68-c. 550/80
  • Prthicandra..................................c. 550/80-c. 557/87
  • Dhrticandra.................................c. 557/87-c. 560/90
  •  ??

 Wethali dynasty

  • Mahataingsandra....................................788-810
  • Thuriyataingsandra.................................810-830
  • Maulataingsandra...................................830-849
  • Paulataingsandra...................................849-875
  • Kalataingsandra....................................875-884
  • Dulataingsandra....................................884-903
  • Thiritaingsandra...................................903-935
  • Thingghathataingsandra.............................935-951
  • Tsulataingsandra...................................951-957
  • Amyathu............................................957-964
  • Paiphyu............................................964-994
  • Ngamengngatum......................................994-1018

 Pingtsa dynasty

  • Khettarheng.......................................1018-1028
  • Tsandatheng.......................................1028-1039
  • Mengrengphyu......................................1039-1049
  • Nagathuriya.......................................1049-1052
  • Thuriyaradza......................................1052-1054
  • Punnaka...........................................1054-1058
  • Mengphyugyi.......................................1058-1060
  • Tsithabeng........................................1060-1061
  • Mengnanthu........................................1061-1066
  • Menglade..........................................1066-1072
  • Mengkula..........................................1072-1075
  • Mengbhilu.........................................1075-1078
  • Thengkhaya........................................1078-1092
  • Mengthan..........................................1092-1100
  • Mengpadi..........................................1100-1103

 Parin dynasty

  • Letyamengnan......................................1103-1109
  • Thihaba...........................................1109-1110
  • Radzagyi..........................................1110-1112
  • Thakiwenggyi......................................1112-1115
  • Thakiwengngay.....................................1115-1133
  • Gauliya...........................................1133-1153
  • Datharadza........................................1153-1165
  • Ananthiri.........................................1165-1167

 Khyit dynasty

  • Mengphuntsa.......................................1167-1174
  • Pintsakawa........................................1174-1176
  • Gannayubaw........................................1176-1179
  • Tsalengkabo.......................................1179-1180

 Second Pingtsa dynasty

  • Midzutheng........................................1180-1191
  • Ngaranman.........................................1191-1193
  • Ngapuggan.........................................1193-1195
  • Ngarakhoing.......................................1195-1198
  • Ngakyun...........................................1198-1201
  • Ngatshu...........................................1201-1205
  • Ngatswaitheng.....................................1205-1206
  • Mengkounggyi......................................1206-1207
  • Mengkhoungngay....................................1207-1208
  • Kambhalounggyi....................................1208-1209
  • Kambhaloungngay...................................1209-1210
  • Letyagyi..........................................1210-1218
  • Letyangay.........................................1218-1229
  • Thanabeng.........................................1229-1232
  • Nganathin.........................................1232-1234
  • Nganalum..........................................1234-1237

 Loung-Kyet dynasty

  • Hlanmaphyu........................................1237-1243
  • Radzathugyi.......................................1243-1246
  • Tsaulu............................................1246-1251
  • Utstsanagyi.......................................1251-1260
  • Tsaumwungyi.......................................1260-1268
  • Nankyagyi.........................................1268-1272
  • Mengbhilu.........................................1272-1276
  • Tsithabeng........................................1276-1279
  • Meng Di...........................................1279-1385 (sic!)
  • Utstsanangay......................................1385-1387
  • Thiwarit..........................................1387-1390
  • Thintse...........................................1390-1394
  • Radzathu..........................................1394-1395
  • Tsithabeng........................................1395-1397
  • Myintsoingkyi..........................................1397
  • Radzathu (restored)...............................1397-1401
  • Thinggathu........................................1401-1403

MRAUK-U dynasty

  • Mengtsaumwun......................................1404-1406 d. 1434
  • (Vacant...........................................1406-1430)
  • Mengtsaumwun (restored)...........................1430-1434
  • Menkhari..........................................1434-1459
  • Batsauphyu........................................1459-1482
  • Daulya............................................1482-1492
  • Batsonygo.........................................1492-1494
  • Ranoung................................................1494
  • Tsalenggathu......................................1494-1501
  • Menradza..........................................1501-1523
  • Gadzabadi.........................................1523-1525
  • Mengtsau-o.............................................1525
  • Thatsata..........................................1525-1531
  • Mengbeng..........................................1531-1553
  • Dik-Kha...........................................1553-1555
  • Tsau-Lha..........................................1555-1564
  • Mengtsekya........................................1564-1571
  • Mengphaloung......................................1571-1593
  • Mengradzagyi......................................1593-1612
  • Mengkhamoung......................................1612-1622
  • Thirithudhamma....................................1622-1638
  • Mengtsani..............................................1638
  • Thado.............................................1638-1645
  • Narabadigyi.......................................1645-1652
  • Tsandathudhamma...................................1652-1684
  • Thirithuriya......................................1684-1685
  • Wara Dhammaradza..................................1684-1692
  • Munithu Dhammaradza...............................1692-1694
  • Tsandathuriya Dhammaradza.........................1694-1696
  • Naukahtadzau...........................................1696
  • Mayuppiya.........................................1696-1697
  • Kalamandat........................................1697-1698
  • Naradhibadi.......................................1698-1700
  • Tsandawimala I....................................1700-1706
  • Tsandathuriya.....................................1706-1710 d. 1734
  • Tsandawidzaya.....................................1710-1731
  • Tsandathuriya (restored)..........................1731-1734
  • Naradhibadi.......................................1734-1735
  • Narapawararadza...................................1735-1737
  • Tsandawidzala..........................................1737
  • Katya..................................................1737
  • Madarit...........................................1737-1742
  • Nara-Apaya........................................1742-1761
  • Thirithu...............................................1761
  • Paramaradza.......................................1761-1764
  • Maharadza.........................................1764-1773
  • Thumana...........................................1773-1777
  • Tsandawimala II........................................1777
  • Thamitha-Dhammayit................................1777-1782
  • Thamada RaZar...........................................1782-1784

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arakan_Kings" 

 

Ancient geography and recent archaeology:

Dhanyawadi, Vesali and Mrauk-u.

Bob Hudson

Archaeology Department, University of Sydney, Australia.

"The Forgotten Kingdom of Arakan" History Workshop.

Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, November 2005.

Recent archaeological excavations and surveys at the old Arakanese sites of Dhanyawadi, Vesali

and Mrauk-u raise new issues about each. It appears that Dhanyawadi is not the eccentric shape

portrayed in early archaeological plans, but an oval site with some notable similarities to the

walled Pyu sites of Upper Myanmar. Vesali shares one of these characteristics, an inwardcurving

brick gate. A radiocarbon date, the first for Vesali, intriguingly places another city gate

in the 13th century AD. A review of the huge earth banks that surround Mrauk-u suggests that the

popular notion that these were defensive may be a romanticised interpretation of what was

essentially a water management system.

Location.

 

The early polities of Arakan were located in the valleys of the Kaladan and Lemro

Rivers. While some traditional accounts locate early settlements, "royal capitals", as far

north as the Kyaukpandaung plateau (Tun Shwe Khine 1992: 20-21) the available

evidence points to the alluvial lowlands. Satellite imagery (Figure 1) shows how

restricted the area available for irrigated rice agriculture was. The old settlements occupy

a strip of land that is only between 15 and 35 kilometres wide, and perhaps 60 kilometres

from north to south. To the north, west and east are hills, and to the south the combined

deltas of the two rivers meet the sea.

Dhanyawadi.

 

There are traditional claims in Arakan of royal capitals dating back to 3000 BC (Tun

Shwe Khine 1992: 20). However the historical record begins with the c. AD 729

Anacandra inscription which describes how the founding king of the Candra Dynasty,

Dvancandra (c. 370-425 AD), "built a city adorned by surrounding walls and a moat"

(Johnston 1944; Gutman 1976: 63, Vol 1). This is Dhanyawadi, whose Gupta-period

sculptures point to the 5th century AD (Gutman 2001: 29). It is the home of the

Mahamuni shrine, an important pilgrimage site for Buddhists (Forchhammer 1892; Tun

Shwe Khine 1994). The shrine is pretty much in the geographical centre of an oval outer

wall which encloses an area of 5.6 square kilometres. Southwest of the shrine is a

relatively square enclosed area, with another square series of walls inside it (Figure 2).

These two sets of inner walls are generally interpreted as a palace. Apart from the walls

themselves, and a couple of small brick structures, there are few brick foundations

evident, suggesting that if this area enclosed an elite centre, then the inhabitants must

have lived mainly in wooden structures built directly on the ground. Excavations on the

eastern side show the walls curving inward to form a corridor, providing a narrow

entranceway to the complex. These walls, like the outer city walls, are several metres

thick, faced with brick, and filled with rubble (Kyaw Zan 2004).

One thing that immediately strikes the observer on seeing the curved brick gate is the

similarity with curved brick corridor gates that have been excavated at Halin, Beikthano

and Sriksetra (Aung Myint 1998). We seem to have no written information from ancient

times to tell us just why the gates were built in this shape. Was their function defence

2

against enemies, administrative (perhaps for the collection of taxes as people went

through- some of the Upper Burma gates had niches that could have housed guards or

officials) or cultural, to ensure that only members of the community that owned the

walled city could enter? Until now, this kind of entranceway had appeared unique to First

Millennium AD Upper Myanmar, but it now seems that the ancient architects must have

exchanged a few ideas across the Arakan Yoma.

Several important features came to light during field survey in 2005. The author, U Nyein

Lwin, of the Archaeology Department in Mrauk-u and U Maung Maung Than, a staff

member of the Mahamuni museum who was raised in the local area, undertook a program

of "ground-truthing", directly checking features that had previously been mapped or

detected from aerial photos or satellite imagery. A key discovery was that the huge earth

banks to the southeast of the Mahamuni, which have appeared on maps as part of the

outer city wall, form quite a separate feature. They very likely became incorporated into

the archaeological plan due to a misinterpretation of aerial photographs (Thin Kyi 1970)

and were cheerfully accepted as giving the city an inexplicably eccentric outline by

subsequent scholars, including the author (Gutman & Hudson 2004: 162). However

inspection on the ground shows that there are brick remains in a field between the earth

banks which form a continuous line with brick walls that run under the earthworks

(Figure 2). The earth bank, sometimes known as the "gold and silver road", has more

than one folk tale attached to it. In one story, it was a twin road to Mrauk-u. In another, it

was an artificial lake built by rival royals to hold boat races. Its walls are now breached,

and crops are grown on its floor.

Other finds from the ground survey include a curved brick gate on the outer east wall and

a stone quarry, characterised by the remains of drill holes in the grey sandstone, at

Kyauktalon, beyond the west wall. The early sculptures of Dhanyawadi and Vesali

largely employ red sandstone, so the Kyauktalon quarry cannot be claimed as a source for

these artworks. Outside the southern part of the outer wall we located a cluster of brick

and/or stone platforms, typically about 8 metres square. They appear as low mounds on

the ground. Many are preserved as field corners, presumably too hard to plough and too

dense to make it worth the effort of removing the brick or stone. Perhaps they are

religious monuments or graves. Careful excavation of one or two of them may provide

valuable new information.

Vesali.

 

Art history and numismatic studies place Vesali between perhaps the 6th and 10th

centuries AD (Nyunt Han 1984; Gutman 2001: 41). It is enclosed by a brick wall, with an

area of 6.2 square kilometres. Excavations in the 1980s revealed several brick buildings.

Regular finds of stone and bronze artifacts were noted then (Nyunt Han 1984) and since

(Shwe Zan 1995). An inner walled area, known as the "palace site", is obscured by the

present village of Wethali, although brick remains are widely seen in the village

pathways and roads. Recent excavations have unearthed a curved brick gateway on the

northern side of the outer wall, which can be seen where the road to Dhanyawadi crosses

the wall (Figure 3, VSL 8). This curved gate appears to have been overbuilt by later

structures (Kyi Khin 2004), suggesting long-term use of the site. In the northwest corner,

a different kind of gate was excavated, a gap in the wall with a large timber post set at

each side (VSL 6). One of these posts has been radiocarbon dated to the period between

AD 1260-1400 at 95.4% probability (sample OZH970, 670±40 BP, Australian Nuclear

Science and Technology Organisation 2005). We should not rush to judgement on the

basis of a single radiocarbon date, but at face value, the result suggests we should at least

3

not discount some kind of construction activity in a period that had previously been

considered to be well after the time the city was occupied. Vesali has been called in the

Arakanese chronicles the "city of stone stairs" (Gutman 1976: 21; Nyunt Han 1984).

Local people point out a section of the bank of the Rann Chaung about 500 metres from

VSL 6 where they say stonework has been seen, but none is visible today.

Mrauk-u.

 

The Mrauk-u period went from the 15th to 18th centuries AD, and seems to have been

preceded by settlement activity along the Lemro River to the east in several centres

including Sambawak/Pyinsa, Parein, Hkrit and Launggret (Harvey 1925: 137-149, 370-

371; Thin Kyi 1970; the Lemro sites were recently re-surveyed by Berliet 2004: 234-

239). A characteristic view of Mrauk-u is that the earth banks that surround particularly

the eastern part of the city were constructed for defence, a maze "calculated to baffle any

enemy", with the capacity for the waters of the town's reservoirs to be let loose to drown

invaders (Collis 1923: 246). A new look at these earth banks, using maps (Burma One

Inch 84 H/2), aerial photographs (thanks to Dr Elizabeth Moore for supplying a rare copy

of a World War II aerial photo of Mrauk-u from the Williams-Hunt Collection at SOAS)

and satellite imagery (LandSat 2000 and IKONOS 1 metre) suggests rather erratic

planning if defence was the main aim (Figure 4). The earth banks of Mrauk-u cover an

area of more than 20 square kilometres. They extend more than 6 kilometres to the

northeast of the citadel, as far as the Lemro River. However to the southeast, they are

effectively on the edge of the city, except for banks fronting low hills that encircle an

alluvial plain. It does not really look like a militarily viable fortification. There seems to

be at least one large gap through which invaders could comfortably march, along a

stream between the northern and southern groups of earth banks and past the Koe-thaung

and Pizi-taung pagodas (Figure 4). There is also the question of the structurally similar

earthworks at Dhanyawadi. It is difficult to attribute a defensive function to the

Dhanyawadi banks, which form a single reservoir backing on to a hillside catchment area

(Figure 2). We might look to water management as a more likely reason for the

construction of the earthworks at both sites, to keep the saline water from the surrounding

tidal rivers and creeks at bay and permit rice irrigation. The Mrauk-u kings are described

as building extensive bunds for water retention as far as the Lemro River in the mid-15th

century (Smart 1917: 66-67).

It must be admitted that in the case of an attack, the complex system of banks and tanks

would have favoured the locals rather than the intruders. Fortified lookout posts, some

with gun ports, remain on the hills around the town (Tun Shwe Khine 1992; Shwe Zan

1995). These fortifications, along with the walls, gates and different kinds of earth banks,

are given individual names in the local tradition, a tradition which considers the earth

banks to be fundamentally defensive (Department of Archaeology n.d.). Histories

describe how King Minbin, in the 16th century, opened the sluices of the reservoirs to

hold back Burmese/Peguan invaders (Harvey 1925: 140, 158). However wars are

irregular occurrences, while agriculture is constant. The dramatic notion of drowning

one's enemies by flooding the city's defences, a story told also of Beikthano (ASB 1905-

06: 7), may be more appealing than the notion of a hydraulic engineering project, but the

original construction of the earth banks should be seen as a creative approach to a

difficult problem of water management that helped bring to Mrauk-u the prosperity that

made it attractive over the years to adventurers from both inside and outside the society.

This is not to suggest that the banks may not have been useful in the defence of the city,

rather that any defensive advantage they may have given would have been the fortunate

consequence of earlier decisions regarding water management.

4

References.

 

ASB 1906-1965 Report of the Superintendent, Archaeological Survey of Burma.

Rangoon, Office of the Superintendent, Government Printing.

Aung Myint 1998 Site Characteristics of Pyu and Pagan ruins. A Comparative Study

of the Dry Areas in Southeast Asia: International Seminar, Kyoto, Japan.

Berliet, Ernelle 2004 Geographie Historique et Urbanisation en Birmanie et ses Pays

Voisins, des origines (IIe s. av JC) a la fin du XIII siecle. Doctoral Thesis.

Ecole Doctorale Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Universite Lumiere, Lyon II

Collis, M.S. 1923 "The Golden City of Mrauk-U." Journal of the Burma Research

Society 13(3): 244-256.

Department of Archaeology n.d. A Brief Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites in

Rakhine State (undated mimeograph), Department of Archaeology, Ministry

of Culture, Union of Myanmar.

Forchhammer, E. 1892 Report on the antiquities of Arakan The Archaeology

Department, Burma.

Gutman, Pamela 1976 Ancient Arakan, with special reference to its cultural history

between the 5th and 11th centuries. PhD thesis. Australian National

University, Canberra. http://thesis.anu.edu.au/public/adt-

ANU20050901.112732/index.html

Gutman, Pamela 2001 Burma's Lost Kingdoms: Splendours of Arakan Orchid Press.

Gutman, Pamela & Bob Hudson 2004 The Archaeology of Burma, from the Neolithic

to Pagan. Southeast Asia: from prehistory to history. I. Glover & P. Bellwood.

Abingdon & New York, Routledge Curzon: 149-176.

Harvey, G. E. 1925 History of Burma Frank Cass & Co Ltd, London.

Johnston, E.H. 1944 "Some Sanskrit inscriptions of Arakan." BSOAS 21: 357-385.

Kyaw Zan 2004 Report on Excavation at Ancient Dhanyawadi (Interim Departmental

Report, in Burmese), Ministry of Culture, Department of Archaeology,

Archaeological Branch Office, Rakhine State.

Kyi Khin 2004 Excavation Report on Mounds VSL-6, VSL-7 and VSL-8 in Ancient

Vesali (Interim Departmental Report, in Burmese), Ministry of Culture,

Department of Archaeology, Archaeological Branch Office, Rakhine State.

Nyunt Han 1984 The Study of Ancient City Vesali (Departmental Report, in Burmese).

Yangon, Department of Archaeology.

Shwe Zan 1995 The Golden Mrauk-U, an ancient capital of Rakhine U Shwe Zan,

Yangon.

Smart, R.B. 1917 Burma Gazetteer, Akyab District, Volume A Superintendent,

Government Printing and Stationery, Union of Burma, Rangoon.

Thin Kyi, Daw 1970 "Arakanese capitals: a preliminary survey of their geographical

siting." Journal of the Burma Research Society 53(2): 1-13.

Tun Shwe Khine 1992 A guide to Mrauk-U, an ancient city of Rakhine, Myanmar U

Tun Shwe.

Tun Shwe Khine 1994 A guide to Mahamuni: the highly venerated golden image of

Buddha with authentic long history Rakhine Book Serial

# This research is supported by a grant and Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Australian Research

Council.

  Mrauk-U

The Ancient Capital of Rakhine State

          Mrauk-U is another interesting historical site in Rakhine, fast becoming a tourist attraction. Mrauk-U was founded in 1430 AD and flourished till 1785 as recorded in its history. Known as the Golden City by foreign travelers of the era it was a focus of trade due to its strategic on the coastal region of Bay of Bengal. Many historical sites such as the old palace grounds and ancient pagodas principally Shitthoung Pagoda (Eighty thousand pagodas), the old city of Vesali, the Mahamuni Image of Kyauktaw offers a glimpse into the Rakhine history.


          A new tourist site which is becoming increasingly more popular in recent years is the old capital of Rakhine (Arakan) called Mrauk-U. Some of the local people refer to it as Myo ( or Mro) Haung, the old city. It was first constructed by the Rakhine King Min Saw Mon in 1430 AD, and remained its capital for 355 years until 1784 when the Rakhine Kingdom ceased to exist as a separate entity and became an integral part of the Myanmar Kingdom.

          The Golden City of Mrauk-U became known in Europe as a city of oriental splendour after Friar Sebastien Manrique visited the area for about (8) years between 1629 to 1637 AD and though he was a Portuguese Augustinian missionary he wrote his fascinating "Travels" in Spanish and published it as a book in 1649 and 1653. Father Manrique's vivid account of the coronation of king Thiri Thudhamma in 1635 and about the Rakhine Court and intrigues of the Portuguese adventurers fired the imagination of later authors, especially after an English translation was published by the Hakluyt Society in 1927 in 2 volumes. In Volume One of this English translation we can read the intriguing account of Rakhine in mid-17th century. Manrique wrote of his astonishment when he was shown a pair of pendant ear-rings, set with priceless rubies as large as a small hen's egg. He said when he beheld these kyauk-nagats he could scarcely fix his eyes on them due to the radiant spendour they cast; he just stood amazed. In the markets also he saw "being sold in abundance, diamonds rubies, sapphires, emeralds, topazes, gold and silver in plates and bars, tin and zinc,"which were very difficult to get in his home country.

          It was the English author Maurice Collis who made Mrauk-U and Rakhine famous after his book The Land of the Great Image based on Friar Manrique's travels in Arakan, was published in 1942. The Great Image is of course, the Maha Muni Buddha Image which is now in Mandalay, though originally it was made and venerated in this area about 15 miles from Mrauk-U where another Maha Muni Buddha Image flanked by two other Buddha images is now worshipped. You can visit this place also on the hillock called Sirigutta, about (6) miles east of Kyauktaw town.


How to get there

          About ten years ago it was difficult to travel to this area but you can easily visit Mrauk-U now. From Yangon there are daily flights to Sittway the capital of Rakhine State. There are Travel and Tour Companies in Yangon and Sittway which operate tours to Mrauk-U and the surrounding area.

          In Sittway you should visit the newly built Rakhine State Cultural Museum and Library and the Buddhist Museum where many interesting antiquities of Rakhine's colourful past are on display.

          From Sittway to Mrauk-U you can take a boat on the Kaladan River and then go into some of its tributary streams. Mrauk-U, on Thinghanadi creek is only 45 miles from Sittway and the sea coast. It is a very pleasant river journey. If you are visiting in the winter months you can see flocks of wild geese, ducks and other migrating waterfowl. To the east of the old city is the famous Kiccapanadi stream and far away the Lemro River. The city area used to have a network of canals.

          In Mrauk-U itself you can visit the Archaeological Museum which is near the Palace Site. This site is right in the centre of Mrauk-U which was built in a strategic location by levelling three small hills. Recently the Archaeology Department has been excavating the Palace Site which was occupied by Rakhine Kings for over two hundred years.

          Even the pagodas are strategically located on hilltops and look like fortresses as indeed they were once used as such in times of enemy intrusion. There are moats, artificial lakes and canals and the whole area could be flooded to deter or repulse attackers.

          There are innumerable pagodas and Buddha images all over the old city and the surrounding hills. Some are still being used as places of worship today; many in ruins are now being restored to their original splendour. You should at least visit some; the most famous and wellworth seing are the Shitthaung, the Andaw, the Dukkhan Thein (Sima or Ordination Hall), the Koethaung, the Laymyetnha and the Shwe Daung pagodas.

          The Shitthaung or "temple of the 80,000 Buddhas" is a fascinating place full of small images, scenes in sculpture of Buddhist stories with the kings and queens, courtiers and common people portrayed in their medieaval costumes and head-dresses, all frozen in stone throughout the ages. You should take a good torch-light to examine the myriad interesting scenes and figures lining the dark corridors of this temple. You can see some Rakhine men boxing and wrestling, some girls dancing and playing, and then there are also the mythical birds, beasts and half-human celestrials and demons. Try and find the figures of both the male and female Vasundhra/ Vasundhari symbolizing the God /Goddess of the Earth.

          The Shitthaung Pagoda, located about half a mile to the north of the palace site was built by one of the most powerful kings of the Mrauk-U Dynasty, called by the people, Minbargyi, but according to records on inscriptions as King Minbin who reigned from 1513 to 1553. The king built this fortress-temple after repulsing a Portuguese attack. The Portuguese mercanaries later served under Rakhine kings. There was also surprisingly an elite corp of Japanese bodyguards protecting the kings of Rakhine.

          The Andaw (meaning the tooth relic of Buddha) is a pagoda only 86 feet to the north-east of the Shitthaung Pagoda. Built by King Min Hla Raza in 1521 it is said to enshrine the tooth relic received from a Sri Lankan king by King Minbin.

          This temple is a hollow octagonal building made of pure sandstone blocks; there are two internal concentric passages, with a prayer hall on the east. Like other temples it is on a small hillock.

          Visitors should see the frescoes giving detailed portrayals of life in the Mrauk-U court; these frescoes are found in Laymyetnha and the Shwe Daung Pagoda. Laymyetnha Pagoda was built by King Min Saw Mon in 1430 AD as one of the original pagodas at the time of the founding of Mrauk-U. The name of the Pagoda means "Four faced" as there are four entrances to this square sandstone structure with a central solid stupa 80 feet high. There are 28 Buddha images as mentioned in the Sambuddha scripture.

          The Shwe Daung pagoda or the "Golden Hill Pagoda" is also believed to have been built by King Minbin between the years 1531-1553. It is a landmark pagoda as it is the tallest in this area and can be seen as far away as 20 miles from the main Kaladan River. The hill itself is 250 feet high and is about half a mile to the south-east of the Palace Site. It is a solid stupa with a circular base. During the First Anglo-Burmese War, 1824-26, the Myanmar forces built earthen fortifications on this hill and mounted guns which inflicted heavy losses on the British forces. Some of these fortifications can still be seen today.

          Standing on a plain of rice fields is the Koethaung Pagoda; the name means 90,000 and probably signified the number of Buddha images it was supposed to contain. It was built by King Min Taikkha, the son of King Min Bin who built the Shitthaung or temple of 80,000 images, so the son exceeded the father by 10,000! It is the biggest pagoda in the Mrauk-U area. Like the Shitthaung, this pagoda is also a massive fortress-like structure built with stone walls and terraces. There are 108 smaller pagodas surrounding it, all made of sandstone. With a winding corridor it is like a cave tunnel which you have to traverse until you reach the central chamber. The inner gallery has collapsed and is no longer accessible. There is an octagonal pagoda in the middle surrounded by over one hundred smaller pagodas. Unlike some of the other temples, not only sandstone, but bricks were also used in this pagoda.

          Apart from the pagodas, visitors should not miss seeing the Ordination Hall, Htukkan Thein, and the exquisite little library the Pitakataik. Htukkan (or Dukkhan) Thein is located about 300 feet to the north-west of Shitthaung Pagoda. Built in 1571 by King Min Phalaung it is on a hillock 30 feet high, with two stone stair ways (8) feet broad on the east and south.
 
          No longer used as an Ordination Hall, it is now one of the well-known pagodas of Mrauk-U. There is a long vaulted passageway which leads to the central shrine room which is 15 feet in height. This room is said to be the place where the Buddhist Archbishop used to sit to discuss religious affairs with Senior Monks. See the seated stone ladies preserving in sculpture the ancient hair-styles, among the many other interesting figures. There are also 140 niches with Buddha images.

          The little library or Pitaka-taik, the Repository for the Buddhist scriptures was built in 1591 also by king Min Phalaung. It measures only 14 feet from east to west, 10 feet from north to south and is only 9 feet in height. Built entirely of stone there are lovely designs on the outer walls making it look like a tiny jewelled casket shaped like a blooming lotus. There were 48 libraries in Mrauk-U but only this one is preserved, though it is sometimes obscured by thickets of bushes and partly covered by moss and weeds which flourish in the 200" of annual rainfall in the region.

          This library is reputed to have housed 30 sets of the Buddhist Tipitaka which King Narapatigyi (1638-1645) received from Sri Lanka. Unfortunately it acquired an unpleasant appellation due to its dark windowless interior. It is now known as Chin-kite library, Chin-kite meaning mosquito-bite. The Rakhine people say that Chin-kite is a Myanmar mispronunciation of the Rakhine word Khraung kaik, the name of the city wall which is close to the north of the library. If you have difficulty in finding this library ask for the Htupayon Pagoda as it is just north of this pagoda.

          The artificial, man-made lakes named Anomakan and Letsekan on the southern part of Mrauk-U were once part of the defence system. They are now peaceful havens for visitors as well as for the local people, and for animals, birds and fish. Letsekan is (3) miles in length and half a mile wide. Some of the old city walls can also be seen.

          The Portuguese and other Europeans were given a separate quarter at Mrauk-U, only about half a mile west of the palace site. The place is called Daingripet and this place for the European settlement is on the other bank of Aungdat creek. The old church built by Father Manrique, now in ruins, can still be seen in this place. It is near the Daingri tank built by King Ba Saw Phyu (1459-1482).

          Rakhine has other historical sites which are earlier than Mrauk-U, at Vesali, only 6 miles to the north, and at Launggret a little further away, but easily reached by car in about half an hour.

          If you are interested in spectacular places of historical interest and natural beauty Mrauk-U is the place. There are now comfortable hotels and guest houses where you can stay while exploring this ancient land, which was once a seat of oriental splendour.


Where to stay in Sittwe!

Gisspa Lodge
U Uttama Road, Sittwe
Ph: 21655
Prince Guest House
27 Main Street, Sittwe
Ph: 21395
Mya Guest House
Near The Central Market, Sittwe
Ph: 21888
Sittwe Hotel
Sittwe
Ph: 21939
Palace Hotel
5 Main Road, Sittwe
Ph: 21657
Sun & Moon Rest House
Sittwe

 
 
   

The Rohginya and the Rakhaing

By

Professor Dr.Aye Kyaw

America Burma Institute

New York

 

{This paper is written in response to a conference on the Rohigya and the

democratic movement of Myanmar, July 16, 2007 held in Tokyo. }

 

The Politics of Meaning

The name Rohingya means the wandering people in the Bengali Language. They are living on their own feet and they are not settled at any place. In the Arakanese language they are called Lwintgya which means the people bloom up and fall down some where and they are the unsettled people. Both languages convey the same meaning. Linguistically, ra, ya,la and ,wa are interchangeable' therefore ra in Rohingya and la in Lwintgya carry the same changeable value.

From "Mujahids" to "Rohingyas"

In the 1950s, the movement for a State was led by "Mujahids" among the Muslims living on the boarders of Arakan and Bangladash.This political tradition is being carried out by the Rohingers who, according to this author's information, will establish  a State called Rohinstan in 2008.The area of this State will comprise some land of both countries-Bangladesh and Myanmar.

In the 1990s, the movement of Rohinger in the shadow of human rights became popular. The so called Burma specialists supported the movements without knowing its political objectives. Before 9/11 some of its leaders were disciples of the terrorists.

In short Rohingas are Muslims. Their objective is primarily to gain a State. What ever other reasons they give are not important.

Arakanese

The Arakanese are called Rakhine which comes from Rakkhitta in Pali- one of the three sacred language of India, the other two being sankrit and Prakrit. It means the people who are capable of preserving and promoting, morality and Buddhism. In the Arakanese Chronicles this meaning is consistent both in writing and meaning. Therefore a genuine Arakanese means a Buddhist who is able to maintain Buddhist morality (not to kill yourself and not to kill others too) and to take care of his race.

The Term Arakanese comes from a Pali word Aratkha, which means the people capable of protecting their own land and its neighbors. In the Arakanese inscription, it is mention as Aratkha Desa which means the land protected by its people. This name, Arakan is often referred to Rakhaing by the foreigners. However, the Arakanese do not call themselves Arakanese. This is exactly like the Chinese who refers themselves as Chung Kuo, the middle country but not the Chinese. The name China comes from a combination of two Sanskrit words Chi and Na, which means sticky mud. In other word, the land where earth wares is made-chinaware.

The Arakanese are also called mag which comes from a Pali word, Magadha, the name of a State where Buddhism flourished. Worth noting is the fact that in the Thai language phasa magadha  means the pali language, therefore the language used in Magadha State was Pali. Accordingly, the Arakanese who live in this Magadha State for many years would have spoken Pali In addition, in Bangalese literature mag means awesome and fearful. Historically being decedents of Indo Aryan Race they had lived in Magadha State for many years.

In terms of these findings, the major difference between the Rakhaing and the   Rohingya is that a Rakhaing is a Buddhist and a Rohingya is a Muslim. The Rakhaing has a long history where as the Rohingya has a short history only after 1948.The Rakhaing are the genuine ethnic people and the Rogingyas are not.

Ethnic Nationality

In 1978 Dr. Maung Maung, then a State councilor invited U San Tha Aung Director General of the department of Higher Education and me to have the meeting in his office to discuss about the definition of the ethnic people in Burma. I could recall that Col, Kyaw Nyien who became Minister of Education in 1980 was sitting in the corner of the meeting room listening to our long discussion.  The names of ethnic people are often mentioned in the revenue inquest of Bodaw Paya (1781-1819). In these records the name Rohingya is never mentioned. After a long academic discussion we decided that genuine ethnic people are those who live in Burma before the conclusion of the first Inglo- Burmese war (1824-26). This war is concluded by the treaty of Yandabo (1826). In other words the genuine ethnic people are those people living in Burma before the treaty of Yandabo. Those who came to Burma after 1826 such as Indian, Bengali, Chinese, and Jews are not native people of Burma .They are not genuine ethnic people.

Rohingya appeared only after the independence of Burma (1948). In the British records I never come across the name Rohingya. "A study of Migration between Arakan and Bengal during the reigns of Arakanese Kings." Never mentioned the name Rohigya.

In short, the Rohingyas are a new creation, which is not found in the Arakanese chronicles and in the British records as well. Their primary objective is to establish a State. On the other hand, The Rakhaing lost their land that they owned for many many centuries; they lost their religion-Buddhism, that they preserved and promoted for many many centuries; and, more importantly they lost their race that they love and respected for many many centuries.

Aye Kyaw

New York

Typing assistants

HHK and AMS

 

Wesite/Multiple Documents

Title:                         The Development of a Muslim Enclave in Arakan (Rakhine) State 

                                  of Burma (Myanmar)

Date of publication:  September 2005

Author/Creator: Dr. Aye Chan

Language: English

Source/Publisher: SOAS Bulletin of Burma Research, Vol 3.No. 2, Auturnn 2005, ISSN

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. Introduction

Who are the Rohingyas? Burma gained independence from Great Britain in 1948 and this issue is a problem that Burma has had to grapple with since that time. The people who call themselves Rohingyas are the Muslims of Mayu Frontier area, present-day Buthidaung and Maungdaw Townships of Arakan (Rakhine) State, an isolated province in the western part of the country across Naaf River as boundary from Bangladesh. Arakan had been an independent kingdom before it was conquered by the Burmese in 1784.  Rohingya historians have written many treatises in which they claim for themselves an indigenous status that is traceable within Arakan State for more than a thousand years. Although it is not accepted as a fact in academia, a few volumes purporting to be history but mainly composed of fictitious stories, myths and legends have been published formerly in Burma and later in the United States and Bangladesh. These, in turn, have filtered into the international media through international organizations, including reports to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [Ba Tha 1960: 33-36; Razzaq and Haque 1995: 15].[*]

            In light of this, it is important to reexamine the ethnicity of these so-called Rohingyas and to trace their history back to the earliest presence of their ancestors in Arakan. And history tells us that we do not have to go back very far. It was in the early 1950s that a few Bengali Muslim intellectuals of the northwestern part of Arakan began to use the term "Rohingya" to call themselves. They were indeed the direct descendants of immigrants from the Chittagong District of East Bengal (present-day Bangladesh), who had migrated into Arakan after the province was ceded to British India under the terms of the Treaty of Yandabo, an event that was concluded at the end of the First Anglo-Burmese War (1824-1826). Most of these migrants settled down in the Mayu Frontier Area, near what is now Burma's border with modern Bangladesh. Actually, they were called "Chittagonians" in the British colonial records. 

            The Muslims in the Arakan State can be divided into four different groups, namely the Chittagonian Bengalis in the Mayu Frontier; the descendents of the Muslim Community of Arakan in the Mrauk-U period (1430-1784), presently living in the Mrauk-U and Kyauktaw townships; the decendents of Muslim mercenaries in Ramree Island known to the Arakanese as Kaman; and the Muslims from the Myedu area of Central Burma, left behind by the Burmese invaders in Sandoway District after the conquest of Arakan in 1784.

 

II. Mass Migration in the Colonial Period (1826-1948)

            As was stated above, the term "Rohingya" came into use in the 1950s by the educated Bengali residents from the Mayu Frontier Area and cannot be found in any historical source in any language before then. The creators of that term might have been from the second or third generations of the Bengali immigrants from the Chittagong District in modern Bangladesh; however, I do not mean to say that there was no Muslim community in Arakan before the state was absorbed into British India.

            When King Min Saw Mon, the founder of Mrauk-U Dynasty (1430-1784) regained the throne with the military assistance of the Sultan of Bengal, after twenty-four years of exile in Bengal, his Bengali retinues were allowed to settle down in the outskirts of Mrauk-U, where they built the well-known Santikan mosque. These were the earliest Muslim settlers and their community in Arakan did not seem to be large in number. In the middle of the seventeenth century the Muslim community grew because of the assignment of Bengali slaves in variety of the workforces in the country. The Portuguese and Arakanese raids of Benga (Bengal) for captives and loot became a conventional practice of the kingdom since the early sixteenth century. The Moghal historian Shiahabuddin Talish noted that only the Portuguese pirates sold their captives and that the Arakanese employed all of their prisoners in agriculture and other kinds of services [Talish 1907: 422]. Furthermore there seem to have been a small group of Muslim gentry at the court. Some of them might have served the king as Bengali, Persian and Arabic scribes. Because the Mrauk-U kings, though of being Buddhist, adopted some Islamic fashions such as the maintaing of silver coins that bore their Muslim titles in Persian and occasionally appearing in Muslim costumes in the style of the Sultan of Bengal. Accordingly there were Muslim servants at the court helping the king perform these Islamic conventions [Charney 1999: 146]. Arthur Phayre, the first deputy commissioner of Arakan, after the British annexation, reported about the indigenous races of Akyab District and the Muslim descendents from the Arakanese days as:

            "The inhabitants are, In the Plains - 1. Ro-khoing-tha [Arakanese]-2. Ko-la [Indian] - 3. Dôm[Low Caste Hindu]. In theHills - 1. Khyoung-tha - 2.Kumé or Kwémwé - 3. Khyang - 4. Doing-nuk, Mroong, and other tribes... While the Arakanese held these possessions in Bengal, they appear to have sent numbers of the inhabitants into Arakan as slaves, whence arose the present Ko-  la population of the country [Phayre 1836: 680 - 681]".

            During the four decades of Burmese rule (1784-1824), because of the ruthless oppressions, many Arakanese fled to British Bengal. According to a record of British East India Company, there were about 35,000 Arakanese who had fled to Chittagong District in British India to seek protection in 1799 [Asiatic Annual Register 1799:61; Charney 1999: 265].  The following report by Francis Buchanan gives a clear portrait of all the atrocities committed by the Burmese invaders in Arakan:

                    "Puran says that, in one day soon after the conquest of Arakan the Burmans put          40,000 men to Death: that wherever they found a pretty Woman, they took her after killing the husband; and the young Girls they took without any      consideration of their parents, and thus deprived these poor people of the        property, by which in Eastern India the aged most commonly support their     infirmities. Puran seems to be terribly afraid, that the Government of Bengal will       be forced to give up to the Burmans all the refugees from Arakan. [Buchanan 1992: 82].[†]"

             A considerable portion of Arakanese population was deported by Burmese conquerors to Central Burma. When the British occupied Arakan, the country was a scarcely populated area. Formerly high-yield paddy fields of the fertile Kaladan and Lemro River Valleys germinated nothing but wild plants for many years [Charney 1999: 279]. Thus, the British policy was to encourage the Bengali inhabitants from the adjacent areas to migrate into fertile valleys in Arakan as agriculturalists. As the British East India Company extended the administration of Bengal to Arakan, there was no international boundary between the two countries and no restriction was imposed on the emigration. A superintendent, later an assistant commissioner, directly responsible to the Commissioner of Bengal, was sent in 1828 for the administration of Arakan Division, which was divided into three districts respectively: Akyab, Kyaukpyu, and Sandoway with an assistant commissioner in each district [Furnivall 1957:29].

The migrations were mostly motivated by the search of professional opportunity. During the Burmese occupation there was a breakdown of the indigenous labor force both in size and structure. Arthur Phayre reported that in the 1830s the wages in Arakan compared with those of Bengal were very high. Therefore many hundreds, indeed thousands of coolies came from the Chittagong District by land and by sea, to seek labor and high wages [Phayre 1836:696].  R.B. Smart, the deputy assistant commissioner of Akyab wrote about the floods of immigrants from Chittagong District as follows:

            "Since 1879, immigration has taken place on a much larger scale, and the descendants of the slaves are resident for the most part in the Kyauktaw and Myohaung [Mrauk-U] townships. Maungdaw Township has been overrun by Chittagonian immigrants. Buthidaung is not far behind and new arrivals will be found in almost every part of the district [Smart 1957: 89]."

At first most of them came to Arakan as seasonal agricultural laborers and went home after the harvest was done. R. B. Smart estimated the number at about 25,000 during the crop-reaping season alone. He added that about the same number came to assist in plowing operations, to work at the mills and in the carrying trades. A total of 50,000 immigrants coming annually were probably not far from the mark [Smart 1957: 99].

            Moreover, land-hunger was the prime mover of the migration of most of the Chittagonians. The British judicial records tell us of an increase in the first decade of the twentieth century in lawsuits of litigation for the possession of land. The Akyab District Magistrate reported in 1913 that in Buthidaung Subdivision, the Chittagonian immigrants stand to native Arakanese in the proportion of two to one, but six sevenths of the litigation for land in the court was initiated by the Chittagonians [Smart 1957: 163]. Another colonial record delivers about a striking account of the settlements of the Bengali immigrants from Chittagong District as:

            "Though we are in Arakan, we passed many villages occupied by Muslim settlers or descendents of the settlers, and many of them Chittagonians [Walker 1891(I): 15]."

            The colonial administration of India regarded the Bengalis as amenable subjects while finding the indigenous Arakanese too defiant, rising in rebellion twice in 1830s. The British policy was also favorable for the settlement of Bengali agricultural communities in Arakan.  A colonial record says:

            "Bengalis are a frugal race, who can pay without difficulty a tax that would press very heavily on the Arakanese....[They are] not addicted like the Arakanese to gambling, and opium smoking, and their competition is gradually ousting the Arakanese [ Report of the Settlement Operation in the Akyab District 1887-1888: 21]."

            The flow of Chittagonian labor provided the main impetus to the economic development in Arakan within a few decades along with the opening of regular commercial shipping lines between Chittagong and Akyab. The arable land expanded to four and a half times between 1830 and 1852 and Akyab became one of the major rice exporting cities in the world.

            Indeed, during a century of colonial rule, the Chittagonian immigrants became the numerically dominant ethnic group in the Mayu Frontier. The following census assessment shows the increase of population of the various ethnic/religious groups inhabiting Akyab District according to the census reports of 1871, 1901 and 1911. There was an increase of 155 per cent in the population in the district. According to the reports, even in an interior township Kyauktaw, the Chittagonian population increased from 13,987 in 1891 to 19, 360 in 1911, or about 77 percent in twenty years.  At the same time the increase of the Arakanese population including the absorption of the hill tribes and the returning refugees from Bengal was only 22.03 percent.

The Assessment of the Census Reports for the years 1871, 1901, and 1911

Races                       1871                   1901                1911              

Mahomedan              58,255             154,887          178,647

Burmese                       4,632              35,751             92,185

Arakanese                 171,612           230,649           209,432

Shan                                334                    80                    59

Hill Tribes                   38,577           35,489            34,020

Others                             606               1,355               1,146    

Total                         276,671           481,666           529,943

 

It should be noted that all the Chittagonians and all the Muslims are categorized as Mohamedan in the census reports. There was an increase of 206.67 percent in Mahomedan population in the Akyab District and it was clear that only a few numbers of the transient agricultural laborers went home after the plowing and   harvesting seasons and most of them remained in Arakan, making their homes@[Smart 1957:83].[‡] The heyday of the migration was in the second half of the nineteenth century after opening of the Suez Canal, for the British colonialists needed more labor to produce rice which was in growing demand in the international market. In the 1921 Census, many Muslims in Arakan were listed as Indians [Bennison 1931: 213].

 

III. Communal Violence

            Moshe Yeagar suggested that during the colonial period the anti-Indian riots broke out in Burma because of the resentment against unhindered Indian settlements particularly in Arakan, Tenasserim and Lower Burma [Yegar 1992:29-31]. But those riots that took place in Rangoon and other major cities in 1926 and 1938 never had had any effects on the peoples of Arakan. A peaceful coexistence was possible for the two different religious/ethnic groups in the Mayu Frontier till the beginning of the World War II. At the beginning of colonial era the establishment of bureaucratic administration by the British repealed the traditional patron-client relationship in the Arakanese villages. The elected village headman had little influence on the elected village council. As John F. Cady wrote, the government policy of forbidding the village headman to take part in the activities related to the nationalist movements weakened the position of the headman as the leader of village community, and as well as his connection with the Buddhist monastery because most of the Buddhist monks were vigorously active in the movements [Cady 1958: 172-273]. On the other hand British administration to a certain extent gave the Muslim village communities religious and cultural autonomy. Maung Nyo, a kyun-ok (headman of the village tract) of Maungdaw Township recorded how the new comers from the Chittagong District set up their village communities in the frontier area. They occupied the villages deserted by the Arakanese during the Burmese rule and established purely Muslim village communities. The village committee authorized by the Village Amendment Act of 1924 paved the way for the Imam (moulovi) and the trusteeship committee members of the village mosque to be elected to the village council. They were also allowed to act as the village magistrates and shariah was somewhat in effect in the Muslim villages [Charter 1938:34-38]. At least the Islamic court of village had the jurisdiction over familial problems such as marriage, inheritance and divorce.  There was no internal sense of unrighteousness and presence of nonbelievers in their community, and accordingly they believe no internecine struggle was for the time being necessary.       

            However, the ethnic violence between Arakanese Buddhists and those Muslim Chittagonians brought a great deal of bloodshed to Arakan during the World War II and after 1948, in the opening decade of independent Burma. Some people of the Mayu Frontier in their early seventies and eighties have still not forgotten the atrocities they suffered in 1942 and 1943 during the short period of anarchy between the British evacuation and the Japanese occupation of the area. In this vacuum there was an outburst of the tension of ethnic and religious cleavage that had been simmering for a century. One of the underlying causes of the communal violence was the Zamindary System brought by the British from Bengal. By this system the British administrators granted the Bengali landowners thousands of acres of arable land on ninety-year-leases. The Arakanese peasants who fled the Burmese rule and came home after British annexation were deprived of the land that they formerly owned through inheritance. Nor did the Bengali zamindars (landowners) want the Arakanese as tenants on their land. Thousands of Bengali peasants from Chittagong District were brought to cultivate the soil [Report of the Settlement Operations in the Akyab District 1887-1888: 2, 21].

            Most of the Bengali immigrants were influenced by the Fara-i-di movement in Bengal that propagated the ideology of the Wahhabis of Arabia, which advocated settling ikhwan or brethren in agricultural communities near to the places of water resources. The peasants, according to the teaching, besides cultivating the land should be ready for waging a holy war upon the call by their lords [Rahman 1979: 200-204]. In Maungdaw Township alone, there were, in the 1910s, fifteen Bengali Zamindars who brought thousands of Chittagonian tenants and established Agricultural Muslim communities, building mosques with Islamic schools affiliated to them. However, all these villages occupied by the Bengalis continued to be called by Arakanese names in the British records [Grantham and Lat 1956: 41-43, 48-51].  For the convenience of Chittagonians seasonal laborers the Arakan Flotilla Company constructed a railway between Buthidaung and Maungdaw in 1914. Their plan was to connect Chittagong by railway with Buthidaung, from where the Arakan Flotilla steamers were ferrying to Akyab and other towns in central and southern Arakan.

            In the age of the independence movement in Burma in 1920s and 1930s the Muslims from the Mayu Frontier were more concerned with the progress of Muslim League in India, although some prominent Burmese Muslims such as M.A. Rashid and U Razak were playing an important role in the leadership of the Burmese nationalist movement. In 1931, the Simon Commission was appointed by the British Parliament to enquire the opinion of Burmese people for the constitutional reforms and on the matter of whether Burma should be separated from Indian Empire. The spokeman of the Muslim League advocated for fair share of government jobs, 10 per cent representation in all public bodies, and especially in Arakan the equal treatment for Muslims seeking agricultural and business loans [Cady 1958: 294].

            In education, the Chittagonians were left behind the Arakanese throughout the colonial period. According to the census of 1901 only 4.5 percent of the Bengali Muslims were found to be literate while the percentage for the Arakanese was 25.5. Smart reported that it was due to the ignorance of the advantages of the education among the Chittagonian agriculturists. Especially Buthidaung and Maungdaw were reported to be most backward townships because the large Muslim population in that area mostly agriculturalists showed little interest in education. In 1894 there were 9 Urdur schools with 375 students in the whole district. The British provincial administration appointed a deputy inspector for Muslim schools and in 1902 the number of schools rose to 72 and the students increased to 1,474 [Smart 1957: 207-209]. Consequently, more Arakanese and Hindu Indians were involved in the ancillary services of the colonial administration. Towards the middle of twentieth century a new educated and politically conscious younger generation had superseded the older, inactive ones. Before the beginning of the Second World War a political party, Jami-a-tul Ulema-e Islam was founded under the guidance of the Islamic scholars. Islam became the ideological basis of the party [Khin Gyi Pyaw 1960: 99].

            Regarding the beginning of the ethnic violence in Arakan, Moshe Yeagar wrote that when the British administration was withdrawn to India in 1942 the Arakanese hoodlums began to attack the Muslim villages in southern Arakan and the Muslims fled to the north where they took vengeance on the Arakanese in Buthidaung and Maungdaw townships [Yegar 1972:67]. However, an Arakanese record says:

            "When the British administration collapsed by the Japanese occupation, the village headman of Rak-chaung village in Myebon Township and his two younger brothers were killed by the kula [Muslim] villagers.  Although the headman was an Arakanese, some of the villagers were kulas. The two Arakanese young men, Thein Gyaw Aung and Kyaw Ya, organized a group and attacked the kula    villages and some inhabitants were killed [Rakhine State People's Council 1986:   36].

            It is certain that hundreds of Muslim inhabitants of Southern Arakan fled northward, and that there were some cases of robbing the Indian refugees on the Padaung-Taungup pass over the Arakan Yoma mountain ranges after the retreat of the British from the Pegu Division and southern Arakan. But the news of killing, robbery and rape was exaggerated when it reached Burma India border [Ba Maw 1968: 78]. The British left all these areas to the mercy of both Burmese and Arakanese dacoits. However, N.R. Chakravati, an Indian scholar, gives a brief account of the flights of Indian refugees from the war zone in the Irrawady valley across the Arakan Yoma.

            "Most of the estimated 900,000 Indians living in Burma attempted to walk over to      India...100,000 died at the time... Practically all Indians except those who were    not physically fit or were utterly helpless, began to move from place to place in        search of safety and protection until they could reach India [Chakravarti 1971:170]."

            The estimated number of Chakravarti includes all the Indian refugees from the whole Burma proper excluding Arakan. The number of Chittagonian refugees put by Yegar was close to 22, 000. [Yegar 1972: 98]. However, the leaders of ANC (Arakan National Congress), formed in 1939 and that later becoming the Arakan branch of Anti-Fascist Organization (AFO) formed a de-facto government, before the Japanese troops and Burma Independence Army (BIA) reached there. The ANC announced that anybody or any organization looting or killing the refugees would be brought before the justice and would be severely punished [ New Burma Daily 1942: May 28].  The Japanese air force attacked Akyab on March 23, 1942 and the British moved their administrative headquarter to India on March 30. The administration by martial law began in Akyab District on April 13, 1942 and with this racial tension burst to the surface, giving way to the public disorder [Owen 1946: 26].

            For all the bloody communal violence experienced by the Arakanese Buddhists in the Western frontier, I feel strongly that it is reasonable to blame the British colonial administration for arming the Chittagonians in the Mayu Frontier as the Volunteer Force. The V Force, as it is called by the British Army, was formed in 1942 soon after the Japanese operations threatened the British position in India. Its principal role was to undertake guerrilla operations against Japanese, to collect information of the enemy's movements and to act as interpreters. But the British Army Liaison Officer, Anthony Irwin wrote that the participation of the local V Forces in the skirmishes with the Japanese in Arakan was discredited by the British commanders [Irwin 1946: 7-8, 16].

             The volunteers, instead of fighting the Japanese, destroyed Buddhist monasteries and Pagodas and burnt down the houses in the Arakanese villages. They first killed U Kyaw Khine, the deputy commissioner of Akyab District, left behind by the British government to maintain law and order in the frontier area; they then massacred thousands of Arakanese civilians in the towns and villages. A record of the Secretary of British governor of Burma in exile dated February 4, 1943 reads:

"I have been told harrowing tales of cruelty and suffering inflicted on the Arakanese villages in the Ratheedaung area. Most of the villages on the West bank of the Mayu River have been burnt and destroyed by the Chittagonian V forces.... The enemy never came to these villages. They had the misfortune of being in the way of our advancing patrols. Hundreds of villagers are said to be hiding in the hills... It will be the Arakanese who will be ousted from their ancestral land and if they cannot be won over in time, then there can be no hope of their salvation [British Library, London, India Office Records R/8/9GS. 4243]."

After the Japanese occupation of Akyab (Sittwe), Bo Yan Aung, the member of the Thirty Comrades and commander of a BIA column, set up the administrative body in Akyab District and attempted to cease the violence in the frontier area. Bo Yan Aung discussed the matter with both Arakanese and Muslim leaders. He sent his two lieutenants, Bo Yan Naung and Bo Myo Nyunt to Maungdaw to negotiate with the radical Muslim leaders. They tried to persuade the Muslims to join in anti-imperialist and nationalist movement. But both of them were killed in Maungdaw and Bo Yan Aung was called back to Rangoon by the BIA headquarters [Rakhine State People's Council 1986: 40-42].

         For most of the Chittagonians it was a religious issue that would necessarily lead to the creation of a Dah-rul-Islam, or at least to being united with their brethren in the west. It also aimed at the extirpation of the Arakanese or being forced them to migrate to the south where there were overwhelming majority of Arakanese Buddhists. The events during the war contributed the Chittagonians' fervent sense of alienation from the heterogeneous community of the Arakan. Anthony Irwin called the whole area a "No Man's Land" during the three years of Japanese occupation [Irwin 1946:27]. Irwin explained how the ethnic violence divided the Arakan State between Arakanese and Chittagonians:

"As the area then occupied by us was almost entirely Mussulman Country ...           [from] that we drew most of our "Scouts" and Agents. The Arakan before   the war had been occupied over its entire lenghth by both Mussulman and Maugh [Arakanese]. Then in 1941 the two sects set to and fought. The result of this war was roughly that the Maugh took over the southern half of the country and       the Mussulman the North. Whilst it lasted it was a   pretty   bloody affairs...My present gun boy a Mussulman who lived near to Buthidaung, claims to have killed two hundred Maughs (Arakanese) [Irwin 1946: 21]."

In the words of the historian, Clive J. Christie, the "ethnic cleansing in British controlled areas, particularly around the town of Maungdaw," was occurring till the arrival of Japanese troops to the eastern bank of Naaf River [Christie 1996: 165].   The British forces began to take offensive in the warfare against the Japanese in northern Arakan in December 1944. The Arakanese troops of AFO maintained law and order in the areas from which Japanese forces withdrew. Of course there were some prominent Arakanese guerrilla leaders who cooperated with the Japanese during the war. British Battalion 65 occupied Akyab, the capital city of Arakan on December 12, 1944. As soon as Akyab was captured the British Army began arresting the Arakanese guerrilla leaders. U Ni, a leader of AFO in Akyab was accused of one hundred and fifty-two criminal offenses and sentenced to forty-two years in prison. Another leader, U Inga was condemned to death by hanging five times, as well as forty-two-year imprisonment. Consequently many guerrilla fighters escaped into hideouts in the forests [Myanmaralin Daily 1945: September 25]. On contrary, Anthony Irwin praised the Chittagonian V Forces as follows:

"It is these minorities that have most helped us in throughout the three years of constant fighting and occupation and it is these minorities who are most likely to be forgotten in the rush of Government. They must not be. It is the duty of all of us, for whom they fought, to see this [Irwin 1946: 86]."

            During the early post-war years both Arakanese and Bengali Muslims in the Mayu Frontier looked at each other with distrust. As the British Labor Government promised independence for Burma, some Muslims were haunted by the specter of their future living under the infidel rule in the place where the baneful Arakanese are also living.  In 1946 a delegation was sent by the Jami-atul Ulema-e Islam to Karachi to discuss with the leaders of the Muslim League the possibility of incorporation of Buthidaung, Maungdaw and Ratheedaung townships into Pakistan, but the British ignored their proposal to detach the frontier area to award it to Pakistan. The failure of their attempts ended in an armed revolt, with some Muslims, declaring a holy war on the new republic. The rebels called themselves "Mujahid."  A guerrilla army of 2700 fighters was organized [Khin Gyi Pyaw 1960: 99; The Nation Daily 1953: April16].

            In fact the Arakanese were well on their way to rebellion. Under the leadership of two prominent and politically active Buddhist monks, U Pinnyathiha and U Seinda, a guerrilla force of 400 to 500 men was raised and assisted the Japanese in occupying the northern Arakan. U Pinnyathiha even announced that the Japanese government had agreed to his proposal for a separate Arakanese unit of Burma Independence Army. Later his force was known as the Arakan Defense Force, under the command of Kra Hla Aung, the protégé of U Pinnyathiha. Later two monks became leaders of Arakan Branch of AFO (Anti-Fascist Organization), turning their guns on the Japanese. At the middle of 1944 they were supported by the British with certain amount of arms to fight the Japanese. Brigadier Richard Gordon Prescott, Deputy Director of Civil Affairs reported to the governor:

"As result of arming certain members of AFO under the leadership of U Pinnyathiha and Kra Hla Aung, the AFO [in Arakan] are endeavoring to set up a parallel government to that of the British Administration and in fact repeating their modus operandi at the time of Japanese invasion of Arakan [British Library, London, India Office Record M/2500]."

In the meantime the AFO changed its name to AFPFL (Anti-Fascist and People's Freedom League) with U Aung San, the ultimate hero of the Burmese independence movement, as its leader. When the AFPFL accepted the proposal of the governor of Burma to join the Executive Council, U Pinnyathiha remained as the AFPFL leader in Arakan while U Seinda was actively preparing a revolt. U Sein Da's group was acting as a local government, controlling a number of villages in the Myebon township of Kyaukpyu District and Minbya township of Akyab District. The fact of the matter was that U Seinda was persuaded by the radical communists of Thakhin Soe's faction of the Communist Party of Burma to choose the way to independence by violence [British Library, London, India Office Records M/4/2500].

            When the Aung San-Attlee Agreement was signed, U Seinda denounced it publicly. An All Arakan Conference was held in Myebon on April 1, 1947 and about 10,000 people from all parties in Arakan attended. U Aung San was openly assailed to his face as an opportunist by some people attending the conference, using rebellious slogans [British Library, London, India Office Records M/4/PRO: WO 203/5262].  U Seinda with the communists behind him moved forward to the rebellion. Actually, Thakhin Soe's Red Flag Communists took advantage of the misunderstanding between U Seinda and AFPFL. It was in fact an ideological struggle in the AFPFL, the national united front of Burma that was under the leadership of the charismatic leader U Aung San. On the other side some Arakanese intellectuals led by U Hla Tun Pru, a Barrister-at-Law, held a meeting in Rangoon and demanded the formation of "Arakanistan" for the Arakanese people [British Library, London, India Office Records, M/4/2503]. All these movements of the Arakanese might have alarmed Muslims from the Mayu Frontier. In the wake of independence most of the educated Muslims felt an overwhelming sense of collective identity based on Islam as their religion and the cultural and ethnic difference of their community from the Burmese and Arakanese Buddhists. At the same time the Arakanese became more and more concerned with their racial security and ethnic survival in view of the increasingly predominant Muslim population in their frontier.

            The ethnic conflict in the rural areas of the Mayu frontier revived soon after Burma celebrated independence on January 4, 1948. Rising in the guise of Jihad, many Muslim clerics (Moulovis) playing a leading role, in the countryside and remote areas gave way to banditary, arson and rapes. Moshe Yeagar wrote that one of the major reasons of Mujahid rebellion was that the Muslims who fled Japanese occupation were not allowed to resettle in their villages [Yegar 1972:98]. In fact, there were more than 200 Arakanese villages in Buthidaung and Maungdaw townships before the war began. In the post-war years only sixty villages were favorable for the Arakanese resettlement. Out of these sixty, forty-four villages were raided by the Mujahids in the first couple of years of independence. Thousands of Arakanese villagers sought refuge in the towns and many of their villages were occupied by the Chittagonian Bengalis [Rakhine State People's Council 1986:58-60].

            The Mujahid uprising began two years before the independence was declared. In March 1946 the Muslim Liberation Organization (MLO) was formed with Zaffar Kawal, a native of Chittagong District, as the leader. A conference was held in May 1948 in Garabyin Village north to Maungdaw and the name of the organization was changed to "Mujahid Party." Some Chittagonian Bengalis from nearby villages brought the weapons they had collected during the wartime to the mosques in Fakir Bazaar Village and Shahbi Bazaar Village [Department of Defense Service Archives, Rangoon, DR 491 (56)].  Jaffar Kawal became the commander in chief and his lieutenant was Abdul Husein, formerly a corporal from the Akyab District police force [Department of Defense Service Archives, Rangoon, DR 1016]. The Mujahid Party sent a letter written in Urdur and dated June 9, 1948 to the government of Union of Burma through the sub-divisional officer of Maungdaw Township. Their demands are as follows [Department of Defence Service Archives, Rangoon: CD 1016/10/11]:

(1)   The area between the west bank of Kaladan River and the east bank of Naaf River must be recognized as the National Home of the Muslims in Burma.

(2)   The Muslims in Arakan must be accepted as the nationalities of Burma.

(3)   The Mujahid Party must be granted a legal status as a political organization.

(4)   The Urdur Language must be acknowledged as the national language of the Muslims in Arakan and be taught in the schools in the Muslim areas.

(5)   The refugees from the Kyauktaw and Myohaung (Mrauk-U) Townships must be resettled in their villages at the expense of the state.

(6)   The Muslims under detention by the Emergency Security Act must be unconditionally released.

(7)   A general amnesty must be granted for the members of the Mujahid Party.

            Calling themselves "the Muslims of Arakan" and "the Urdur" as their national language indicated their inclination towards the sense of collective identity that the Muslims of Indian sub-continent showed before the partition of India into two independent states. When the demands were ignored the Mujahids destroyed all the Arakanese villages in the northern part of Maungdaw Township. On July 19, 1948 they attacked Ngapru-chaung and near by Villages in Maungdaw Township and some villagers and Buddhist monks were kidnapped for ransoms [Department of Defense Service Archives, Rangoon: CD 1016/10/11]. On June 15 and 16, 1951 All Arakan Muslim Conference was held in Alethangyaw Village, and "The Charter of the Constitutional Demands of the Arakani Muslims" was published. It calls for "the balance of power between the Muslims and the Maghs [Arakanese], two major races of Arakan." The demand of the charter reads:

            "North Arakan should be immediately formed a free Muslim State as equal constituent Member of the Union of Burma like the Shan State, the Karenni State, the Chin Hills, and the Kachin Zone with its own Militia, Police and Security Forces under the General Command of the Union [Department of the Defense Service Archives, Rangoon: DR 1016/10/13]."     

Here it is again noticeable that in the charter these peoples are mentioned as the Muslims of Arakan. The word "Rohingya" was first pronounced by the Mr Abdul Gaffar, an MP from Buthidaung, in his article "The Sudeten Muslims," published in the Guardian Daily on August 20, 1951.

However, the new democracy in the independent Burma induced some Muslim leaders to remain loyal to the state. The free and fair elections were held and four Muslims were elected to the legislature from Buthidaung and Maungdaw townships. Meanwhile the Mujahid insurgency threw the frontier area into turmoil for a decade.  During his campaign for the 1960 elections, Burmese Prime Minister U Nu who succeeded U Aung San after the independence hero was assassinated, promised the statehood for Arakanese and Mon peoples. When he came to the office after a landslide victory the plans for the formation of the Arakan and Mon states were affected. Naturally the Muslim members of parliament from Buthidaung and Maungdaw Townships denounced the plan and called for the establishment of a Rohingya State.

            General Ne Win took power in a coup d'etat in 1962, and almost all the Rohingya movement went underground. The first step of Ne Win's Burmese Way to Socialism was the nationalization of the private enterprises in 1964. The plan was clearly aimed at the transfer of private assets owned by the Indian and Chinese entrepreneurs into state ownership in the form of the public corporations. Most of the Indian and Pakistani businesspeople, living in the major cities of Burma, left Burma. In the two years following the decision to nationalize the retail trade, some 100,000 Indians and some 12,000 Pakistani left Burma for their homeland. The flow of Indians returning to India as a result of these policies began in 1964 [Donison 1970: 199-200]. But the Muslim agriculturists from Northern Arakan, most of them, holding the national registration cards issued by the Department of National Registration in the post-war decade, were not concerned with the event and remained in the frontier areas till the Citizenship Law of 1982 was enforced in 1987.

 In 1973 Ne Win's Revolutionary Council sought public opinion for drafting anew constitution. The Muslims from the Mayu Frontier submitted a proposal to the Constitution Commission for the creation of separate Muslim state or at least a division for them [Kyaw Zan Tha 1995:6].  Their proposal was again turned down.When elections were held under the 1974 Constitution the Bengali Muslims from the Mayu Frontier Area were denied the right to elect their representatives to the "Pyithu Hlut-taw" (People's Congress). After the end of the Independence War in Bangladesh some arms and ammunitions flowed into the hands of the young Muslim leaders from Mayu Frontier. On July 15, 1972 a congress of all Rohingya parties was held at the Bangladeshi border to call for the "Rohingya National Liberation" [Mya Win 1992: 3].

Burma's successive military regimes persisted in the same policy of denying Burmese citizenship to most Bengalis, especially in the frontier area. They stubbornly grasped the 1982 Citizenship Law that allowed only the ethnic groups who had lived in Burma before the First Anglo-Burmese War began in 1824 as the citizens of the country. By this law those Muslims had been treated as aliens in the land they have inhabited for more than a century. According to the 1983 census report all Muslims in Arakan constituted 24.3 percent and they all were categorized as Bangladeshi, while the Arakanese Buddhists formed 67.8 percent of the population of the Arakan (Rakhine) State [Immigration and Manpower Department 1987:I-14].

 In the abortive 1988 Democracy Uprising those Muslims again became active, hoisting the Rohingya banner. Subsequently when the military junta allowed the registration of the political parties they asked for their parties to be recognized under the name "Rohingya." Their demand was turned down and some of them changed tactics and formed a party, the National Democratic Party for Human rights (NDPHR) that won in four constituencies in 1990 elections as eleven candidates of the Arakan League for Democracy (ALD) were elected to the legislature. However, the Elections Commission abolished both the ALD and the NDPHR in 1991. Some of the party members went underground and into exile.

Recently the main objectives of the movement of some groups have been to gain the recognition of their ethnic entity in the Union of Burma and to obtain the equal status enjoyed by other ethnic groups. But some elements have adopted the radical idea of founding a separate Muslim state. These are the Rohingya organizations currently active on the Burma-Bangladesh border [Mya Win 1992: 3].

1.              RSO (Rohingya Solidarity Organization)

2.              ARIF (Arakan Rohingya Islamic Front)

3.              RPF (Rohingya Patriotic Front)

4.              RLO (Rohingya Liberation Organization)

5.              IMA (Itihadul Mozahadin of Arakan)

 

IV. Conclusion

            After Burma gained independence, a concentration of nearly ninety percent of the area's population, the distinguishing characteristics of their own culture and the Islamic faith formed an ethnic and religious minority group in the western fringe of the republic. For successive generations their ethnicity and Islam have been practically not distinguishable. At the beginning they adopted the policy of irredentism in favor of joining East Pakistan with the slogan, "Pakistan Jindabad," (Victory to Pakistan). This policy faded away when they could not gain support from the government of Pakistan. Later they began to call for the establishment of an autonomous region instead. Pakistan's attitude toward the Muslims in Arakan was different from the Islamabad's policy toward Kashmiris. During the Independence War in Bangladesh most of the Muslims in Arakan supported West Pakistan. After Bangladesh gained independence Dhaka followed the policy of disowning those Chittagonians. Consequently they had to insist firmly on their identity as Rohingyas. Their leaders began to complain that the term "Chittagonian Bengali" had arbitrarily been applied to them. But the majority of the ethnic group, being illiterate agriculturalists in the rural areas, still prefers their identity as Bengali Muslims.

Although they have showed the collective political interest for more than five decades since Burma gained independence, their political and cultural rights have not so far been recognized and guaranteed. On the contrary the demand for the recognition of their rights sounds a direct challenge to the right of autonomy and the myth of survival for the Arakanese majority in their homeland. A symbiotic coexistence has so far been inconceivable because of the political climate of mistrust and fear between the two races and the policy of the military junta. The Muslims from the other parts of Arakan kept themselves aloof from the Rohingya cause as well. Thus the cause of Rohingyas finds a little support outside their own community, and their claims of an earlier historical tie to Burma are insupportable.

 

 Appendix I

 

British Burma Census of 1872                                                                               

 

Akyab Town

 

Group

Male

Female

 Total

Hindu

 1,884

      28

  1,911

Mohomendan

 3,516

 1,502

  5,018

Buddhist

 5,892

 5,627

11,519

Christian

    216

    109

     325

Others

    387

      70

     457

Grand Total

11,895

 7,335

19,230

         

[Department of Revenue, Agriculture and Commerce 1875, 42]

 

 Appendix II

The Statement Showing the Distribution of People According to their Birth Places                                          British Burma Census of 1881

                                               (Arakan Division)

 

Birth Place

Male

 Female

 Total

Akyab Dist.

 144,746

 132,131

  276,877

Bassein

        721

        518

      1,239

Hanthawaddy

        178

        157

         335

Henzada

        230

        232

         471

Kyauk Pyu

   79,487   

   79,180

  158,667

Mergui

            3

            2

             5

Moulmein town

          24

          23

           47

North Arakan

      7,138

     6,853

     13,991

Prome

         805

        628

       1,433

Rangoon Town

         112

          75

          187

Sandoway

    27,410

   27,363

     54,773

Shway Gyin

             1

            4

              5

Tavoy

            17

            1

            18

Tharawaddy

              4

            9

            13

Thayetmyo

          704

        599

       1,303

Thone Gwa

              6

            5

            11

Toungoo

              9

            3

            12

Assam

              8

 

              8

Bengal

     49,374

    19,435

     68,809     

Bombay

              5

           3

              8

Central

              2

           1

              3

Diu

            27

 

            27

Goa

              5

 

              5

Madras

       1,823

         31

       1,854

Nepal

            49

         10

            59

N-Western Provices

          246

         14

          260

Oudh

              2

 

              2

Punjab

            63

           6

            69

Afganistan

              4

 

              4   

Arabia

              3

 

              3

 

[1881- British Burma Census. Appendix   LXXVIII]

 

Bibliography

Primary Sources                                                           

Ba Maw. 1958. Breakthrough in Burma, memoirs of a revolution, 1939-46. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Bennison, J.J.1931. Census of India of 1931, Volume XI, Part I, Burma. Rangoon: Government Press.

Buchanan, Francis. 1992. Francis Buchanan in Southeast Bengal (1798): His Journey to Chittagong, the Chittagong Hill Tracts,  Noakhali and Comilla. Dhaka: Dhaka University Press.

Census Commissioner of India. Census of India, 1881. Calcutta: 1896

Department of Defense Service Archives. Rangoon. CD 1016/10/11

----------------------Do ------------------------------------. CD 495(56)

----------------------Do-------------------------------------. DR 1016/10/13

Department of Revenue, Agriculture and Commerce 1875.The Census of British Burma. Rangoon: Government Press

 

Grantham, S and Lat, Maung. 1956. Burma Gazetteer: Akyab District, Volume (B). Rangoon: Government Press.

Forchhammer, Emil. 1892. Papers on Subjects Relating to the Archaeology of Burma: A Report on the History of Arakan. Rangoon: Government Press.

Irwin, Anthony. 1945. Burmese Outpost (Memoirs of a British Officer who fought in Arakan with the Arakanese V Forces during the Second World War). London: Collins.

1987. Rakhine State 1983 Population Census. Rangoon: Immigration and Manpower Department, Ministry of Home Affairs.

Myanma-Alin Daily, September 25, 1945. Rangoon: Myanmaralin Press.

Owen, Frank. 1946. The Campaigns in Burma. London: His Majesty Stationary Office.

Phayre, Arthur. 1841. "Account of Arakan." Journal of the Asiatic Society, 10: 629 - 712.

1875. Report on the Census of British Burma. Rangoon: Government Press

1943. Records of the Governor's Secretary Office. India Office Records 8/9. London: British Library.

1888. Report on the Settlement Operations in Akyab District 1887-88. Rangoon: Government Press.

Smart, R.B.1957. Burma gazetteer: Akyab District, Volume (A). Rangoon: Government Press.

Talish, Shihabuddin. 1907. "The Frengi Pirates of Chatagaon." Jadunath Sakar (tr.). Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal (3): 419-425

Tha Gyaw, Bonebauk. 1971. Tawhlanyay-khayeeway (On the Road to Revolution). Rangoon: Thandar Aung Sarpay

Walker, H.B. 1891. "Journey on the Ann Pass." Records of the Intelligence Department. Rangoon: Government Press

 

Secondary Sources

Ba Tha. 1959. "Shah Shuja in Arakan." The Guardian Magazine, 6(9): 26-28

--------  1960. "Rowengyas in Arakan." The Guardian Magazine, 7(5): 33-36

Charney, Michael W. 1999.Where Jambudipa and Islamdom Converged: Religious Change and the Emergence of Buddhist Communalism in Early Modern Arakan (Fifteenth to Nineteenth Centuries). PhD Dissertation.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan

Charter, Langhan.1938. "The Archives of Arakanese Families," Journal of Burma Research Society (38): 34-38

Christie, Clive J. 1996. A Modern History of Southeast Asia: Decolonization, Nationalism and Separatism. London: I.B Tauris Publishers

Donison, F.S. 1970. Burma. London:Ernest Benn

Furnivall, J.S. 1957. Colonial Policy and Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.

Gaffar, Abdul. 1951. "The Sudeten Muslims" The Guardian Daily, August 20, 1951, Rangoon: Guardian Press.

Khin Gyi Pyaw. 1960. "Who Are the Mujahids in Arakan?" Rakhine Tazaung Magazine. Rangoon: Rangoon University Arakanese Culture Association.

Kyaw Zan Tha, U. 1995. "Background of the Rohingya Problem." Rakhine Tazaung Magazine. Rangoon: Rangoon University Arakanese Culture Association.

Mya Win. 1992. "If We Appraise the Attempts Made to Sow Enmity against Myanmar Naing-ngan." Working Peoples' Daily: January 25, 1992.

Rahman, Fazlur. 1979. Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rakhine State People's Council. 1986. Pyinay-phyitsin-thamaing (Chronological Records of  Arakan State) A type-written Manuscript for circulation. Akyab (Sittwe).

Rahman, Fazlur.1979. Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Razzaq, Abdur & Haque, Mahfuzul. 1995. A Tale of Refuguees: Rohingyas in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Center for Human Rights.

Yeagar, Moshe.1972. The Muslims of Burma: A Study of Minority Group. Wiesbaden.


[*] See http://www.hrw.org/reports/2000/burma/burm for the report to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

[†] Puran Bisungri was an officer of the Police Station of Ramoo what is called Panwah by the Arakanese. He was a Hindu, born in Arakan and fled the country after Burmese invasion of 1784 [Buchanan 1992: 79].

[‡] See Appendix I. According to the 1872 Census Muslims had already formed 26.1 per cent of the population of Akyab, the capital city of Arakan Division.  Also see Appendix II. According to the 1881 Census 68,809 people of the population of Arakan Division that numbered 276,877 were born in Bengal.

"The World's Oldest Trade": Dutch Slavery and Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean in the Seventeenth Century*

Markus Vink
SUNY-Fredonia

 


 

"Compared with the Atlantic trade, none of this Indian Ocean flow of captive labor, legal or illegal, has been well researched, and there are no conclusive quantitative studies of its volume ..."
P. Finkelman and J. C. Miller eds.,
MacMillan Encyclopedia of World Slavery
(New York, 1998), p. 851.
 
"In comparison with the literature on the trans-Atlantic slave trade, a number of topics in the slave trade in Asia and Oceania remain under-researched ..."
S. Drescher and S. L. Engerman, eds.,
A Historical Guide to World Slavery
(New York, 1998), p. 364.
 
"The evidence of the slave trade in the Indian Ocean is scanty and periodic, and could reflect the nature of the trade. There are huge gaps in the evidence, which might reflect the spasmodic and periodic nature of the slave trade but also the sheer lack of information for long stretches of time."
S. Arasaratnam, "Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean
in the Seventeenth Century," in K. S. Mathew ed.,
Mariners, Merchants and Oceans: Studies in
Maritime History
(New Delhi, 1995), p. 195.
 
Slavery, far from being a "peculiar institution," has deep and far-reaching roots, stretching back at least to the beginnings of historical times in many parts of the world. In his five-volume magnum opus on the Dutch East Indies, Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indiën (1724-26), Calvinist minister François Valentijn appropriately called the enslavement of human beings "the world's oldest trade" (den oudsten handel in de wereld).1 For most of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the Dutch were active participants in the Atlantic and Indian Ocean slave trades. For brief spells during the seventeenth century they even dominated the Atlantic slave trade, while for nearly two centuries they were "the nexus of an enormous slave trade, the most expansive of its kind in the history of Southeast Asia."2 Whereas the Atlantic slave trade has been mapped out in relatively great detail in numerous studies, its Indian Ocean counterpart has remained largely uncharted territory and overlooked in Asian colonial historiography. Indeed, the sufferings of the slaves in Asia occurred mainly in silence, largely ignored by both contemporaries and modern historians. Moreover, if we are to believe one Dutch colonial historian, Indian Ocean slavery "as a topic will never play such an important role as it does in the Caribbean."31
     Two notable exceptions exist to the "history of silence"4 surrounding the Indian Ocean slave trade: the east coast of Africa (though mostly centered on the period after 1770) and the Dutch Cape Colony (1652-1796/1805). The Afrocentric focus of Indian Ocean historiography is a derivative of the Atlantic slave trade in general, and reflects the takeoff of plantation slavery on the Swahili coast and the Mascarene Islands (Mauritius and Réunion) in the late eighteenth century5 along with its obvious connections with the modern biracial system of apartheid in South Africa (1948-94) in particular.62
     The underdevelopment of an Asian-centric historiography on colonial slavery and slave trade can be attributed to a number of factors. First, a fragmented administrative superstructure belied the underlying unity of the Indian Ocean world system, making archival research a formidable task to any serious scholar. The archival materials of the major European powers of the early modern period (Dutch, British, French, and Portuguese) are deposited in the national archives at The Hague, London, Paris, and Lisbon, along with the numerous archives overseas in Indonesia, India, South Africa, and elsewhere. Despite the presence of a central Asian headquarters in Batavia (modern Jakarta), even the numerous settlements of the Dutch East India Company or VOC (1602-1799) had separate administrations and record keeping. Second, unlike the Atlantic slave complex, European and preexisting indigenous forms of bondage seemingly shared many forms of similarities. Except for South Africa, European colonial powers took over and interacted with existing Indian Ocean systems of slavery, rather than imposing their own system in a relative vacuum as in the New World. Third, though recently challenged by revisionist historians, Indian Ocean slavery, focused on the household, has been traditionally portrayed by apartheid apologists and other "settler historians" as paternalist, patriarchal, and relatively "benign" compared to its Atlantic plantation counterpart.7 Fourth, the focus of Asian colonial historiography has been on indentured workers and coerced labor systems of a later period or "new systems of slavery," such as the Indian, Chinese, and Javanese "coolie" and the Cultivation System and Liberal Period in nineteenth-century Java and Southeast Sumatra.8 Finally, studies of the Dutch East India Company period (1602-1799) concentrate on trade, political economy, and, more recently, urban history.9 Because slave trade was in general insignificant in monetary terms, most surveys and regional studies on the Dutch East India Company mention slavery and the slave trade only in passing. In the eighteenth century, for instance, when the volume of the Dutch slave trade was substantially larger than in the seventeenth century, slaves only accounted for 0.5% of the total value of company trade.10 These works on the company history ignore the extensive slave trade of company servants as private individuals, along with European settlers or free burghers and Asian subjects of areas under company jurisdiction. Moreover, they obviously gloss over the crucial economic, social, and cultural significance of slave labor in Dutch colonial settlements, which, as we will see, were in fact true "slave societies." As Hubert Gerbeau acutely observed more than twenty years ago, "The specialist in the slave trade is a historian of men and not of merchandise, and he cannot accept the silence of those transported."113
     This article is a first step to "unsilence" the history of the world's oldest trade and to correct or "re-Orient" the historiographical imbalance by looking at the organization and numerical aspects of Dutch slavery and slave trade in the Indian Ocean in the seventeenth century. The term "Dutch" consists of three components: (1) the Dutch East India Company or VOC as a semi-official institution or chartered company with delegated government rights; (2) Dutch East India Company officials as private individuals; and (3) European settlers or free burghers and Asians in areas under Dutch jurisdiction. Despite the problematic nature of the term "slave" in an Indian Ocean context,12 its special characteristics included property or chattel status and the ensuing potential of re-isolation, institutionalized coercion and systemic exploitation, outsider status or essential kinlessness defined as "social death," and lack of control over physical reproduction and sexuality.134
     Two basic systems of Indian Ocean slavery can be distinguished. The "open system" of slavery could be found in the commercialized, cosmopolitan cities of Southeast Asia and elsewhere where the boundary between slavery and other forms of bondage was porous and indistinct and upward mobility was possible. In the "closed systems" of South (and East) Asia, with some notable exceptions, it was inconceivable for a slave to be accepted into the kinship systems of their owners as long as they remained slaves because of the stigma of slavery; instead they were maintained as separate ethnic groups. The term "slave" here includes so-called "true slaves," those recently captured and sold in open systems, and those in closed systems of slavery, along with all other forms of bondage and ties of vertical obligation.145
     This article discusses various aspects of Dutch slavery and slave trade in the Indian Ocean: the markets of supply and demand or geographic origins and destinations of slaves; the routes to slavery or the diverse means of recruitment of forced labor; the miscellaneous occupations performed by company and private slaves; the size of Dutch slavery and the volume of the accompanying annual slave trade; and the various forms of slave resistance and slave revolt. The findings presented here are tentative, illustrating broad contours in bold, sweeping strokes. Further research will be necessary to fill in the details and shed new light on the world's oldest trade in the Indian Ocean basin, but the protracted history of silence has finally ended.6
     The discussion that follows tries to transcend the ahistorical, incomplete, descriptive, static, one-dimensional picture and conventional generalized abstractions of slavery that characterize much of traditional scholarship. Instead, an alternative historicized, holistic, analytical, dynamic, and multi-dimensional, open model is suggested, sensitive to chronological and geographic variations, socioeconomic and political contexts, and cross-cultural interactions. To the extent that the effort has been (un)successful, it is to some extent a reflection of the current state of the field.157
  

Markets of Supply: Origins of Slaves

 
Inspired by the spatial and temporal geo-historical conceptualizations of Fernand Braudel and the "Annalistes," various studies have looked at the Indian Ocean basin as a meaningful unit of analysis.16 Sometime before 300 B.C.E., sailors of various nationalities began to knit together the shores of the Indian Ocean into a world-system by riding the seasonal monsoon winds blowing off and onto the Asian continent. The resulting multifaceted diffusionist process of "southernization" integrated the societies and cultures of what the Arabs styled al-bahr al-Hindi ("Indian Ocean"), the Persians darya'i akhzar ("Green Sea"), and the Chinese the Nan-yang ("Southern Ocean").8
     Southernization is characterized by both multidimensionality of relationships and nonsimultaneity of geographic boundaries. Ross Dunn considers the concept of southernization as a useful "post-civilizational narrative" and possible new paradigm: "It is not enough simply to say that there was significant trade among the societies clustered around the South Asian center. The products and exchanges created broad regions of similarities which distinguished one distinctive 'world' from another."17 Thus a "world of slaves" emerges as a meaningful unit with interacting elements (e.g., "slave societies") rather than a series of separate "worlds" that have relationships with each other. (In many ways, this post-civilizational narrative is commodity history, a variation on cross-cultural trade, taking a particular commodity as the starting point for the analysis of one or more societies, economic systems, groups involved in production, transportation, marketing, and consumption, and so forth.)9
     In his classic two-volume study on the Indian Ocean world, K. N. Chaudhuri convincingly demonstrates that capitalist, long-distance trade in luxury goods and bulky commodities provided an underlying unity of the region, cutting across geographical and cultural watersheds. Chaudhuri distinguishes "four significant expansionary forces" from the rise of Islam in the seventh century to the onset of European colonialism in the mid-eighteenth century: the emergence and spread of Islam from the Middle East, the massive presence of Chinese civilization and political power, the periodic migration of nomadic peoples from Central Asia, and (after 1500) European maritime expansion. During this life cycle, Chaudhuri argues, "[m]eans of travel, movements of peoples, economic exchange, climate, and historical forces created elements of cohesion." Elaborating on Chaudhuri's work, Janet Abu-Lughod styles the Indian Ocean as "that great 'highway' for the migration of peoples, for cultural diffusion, and for economic exchange."1810
     The Dutch Indian Ocean slave trade precisely involved, among others, the movement of peoples, cultural diffusion, and economic exchange during the later stages of the Indian Ocean ancien régime.19 The Dutch further integrated the Indian Ocean basin by creating direct and more extensive linkages across the region and incorporating previously isolated cultures and societies on the southwestern and eastern peripheries. In the seventeenth century, Batavia (Jakarta), the company's central Asian headquarters and seat of the governor-general and Council of the Indies, became the hub of a flourishing intra-Asiatic or country trade. As the company directors intimated to the high government at Batavia in 1648, "The country trade and the profit from it are the soul of the Company which must be looked after carefully because if the soul decays, the entire body would be destroyed."2011
     The Dutch Indian Ocean slave system drew captive labor from three interlocking and overlapping circuits of subregions: the westernmost, African circuit of East Africa, Madagascar, and the Mascarene Islands (Mauritius and Réunion); the middle, South Asian circuit of the Indian subcontinent (Malabar, Coromandel, and the Bengal/Arakan coast); and the easternmost, Southeast Asian circuit of Malaysia, Indonesia, New Guinea (Irian Jaya), and the southern Philippines.2112
     In general, the Dutch slave trade took people from segmented microstates and stateless societies in the East outside the "House of Islam" to the company's Asian headquarters, the "Chinese colonial city" of Batavia (Jakarta),22 and its regional center in the "western districts" of the Indian Ocean, coastal Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Other destinations included strategic emporia such as Malacca (Melaka) and Makassar (Ujungpandang), along with the plantation economies of eastern Indonesia (Maluku, Ambon, and Banda Islands), and the agricultural estates of the southwestern Cape Colony (South Africa). Though each company settlement had some specific catchment area, certain common patterns prevailed.13
     The first circuit or subregion, the Indian subcontinent (Arakan/Bengal, Malabar, and Coromandel), remained the most important source of forced labor until the 1660s (see Table 1 ). Between 1626 and 1662, the Dutch exported with reasonable regularity 150-400 slaves annually from the Arakan-Bengal coast. During the first thirty years of Batavia's existence, Indian and Arakanese slaves provided the main labor force of the company's Asian headquarters. For instance, of the 211 manumitted slaves in Batavia between 1646 and 1649, 126 (59.71%) came from South Asia, including 86 (40.76%) from Bengal. 23 Slave raids into the Bengal estuaries were conducted by Magh pirates using armed vessels (galias), joining hands with unscrupulous Portuguese traders (chatins) operating from Chittagong outside the jurisdiction and patronage of the Estado da India. These raids occurred with the active connivance of the Taung-ngu (Toungoo) rulers of Arakan. The eastward expansion of the Mughal Empire, however, completed with the conquest of Chittagong (renamed Islamabad) in 1666, cut off the traditional supplies from Arakan and Bengal. 24 Until the Dutch seizure of the Portuguese settlements on the Malabar coast (1658-63), large numbers of slaves were also captured and sent from India's west coast to Batavia, Ceylon, and elsewhere. After 1663, however, the stream of forced labor from Cochin dried up to a trickle of about 50-100 and 80-120 slaves per year to Batavia and Ceylon, respectively. 26 14


 
Table 1.Company slave exports from the Indian subcontinent (Arakan/Bengal and the Coromandel Coast) in the seventeenth century
Table 1
    * This list only represents Coromandel exports in so-called "boom" years.
    † Exported by private traders to Ceylon.
    Source: see footnote 25.
 

 
     In contrast with other areas of the Indian subcontinent, Coromandel remained the center of a spasmodic slave trade throughout the seventeenth century. In various short-lived booms accompanying natural and human-induced calamities, the Dutch exported thousands of slaves from the east coast of India. A prolonged period of drought followed by famine conditions in 1618-20 saw the first large-scale export of slaves from the Coromandel coast in the seventeenth century. Between 1622 and 1623, 1,900 slaves were shipped from central Coromandel ports, such as Pulicat and Devanampatnam. Company officials on the coast declared that 2,000 more could have been bought if only they had the money.15
     The second short-lived boom in the export of Coromandel slaves occurred during a famine in the wake of the revolt of the Nayaka Hindu rulers of South India (Tanjavur, Senji, and Madurai) against Vijayanagara overlordship (1645) and the subsequent devastation of the Tanjavur countryside by the Bijapur army. According to indigenous informants, more than 150,000 people were taken by the invading Deccani Muslim armies to Bijapur and Golconda. In 1646, 2,118 slaves were exported to Batavia, the overwhelming majority from southern Coromandel. Some slaves were also acquired further south at Tondi, Adirampatnam, and Kayalpatnam.16
     A third short-lived boom in slaving took place between 1659 and 1661 due to the devastation of Tanjavur resulting from another series of successive Bijapuri raids, creating the usual "famine-slave cycle." At Nagapatnam, Pulicat, and elsewhere, the company purchased 8,000-10,000 slaves, the bulk of whom were sent to Ceylon while a small portion were shipped to Batavia and Malacca. A fourth boom (1673-77) was initiated by a long drought in Madurai and southern Coromandel starting in 1673, exacerbated by the prolonged Madurai-Maratha struggle over Tanjavur and resulting oppressive fiscal practices. Between 1673 and 1677, the VOC exported 1,839 slaves from the Madurai coast alone. A fifth boom occurred in 1688, caused by a combination of poor harvests and the Mughal advance into the Karnatak. Reportedly thousands of people from Tanjavur, mostly girls and little boys, were sold into slavery and exported by Asian traders from Nagapattinam to Aceh, Johor, and other slave markets. In September 1687, 665 slaves were exported by the English from Fort St. George, Madras. The Dutch decision to participate was belated for the boom ended as abruptly as it had started as a result of the abundant rice harvest in early 1689. Finally, in 1694-96, when warfare once more ravaged South India, a total of 3,859 slaves were imported from Coromandel by private individuals into Ceylon.2717
     After 1660 relatively more slaves came from the second circuit or subregion, Southeast Asia. Warfare and endemic raiding expeditions provided a steady supply of slaves from the region's stateless societies and microstates, especially after the collapse of the powerful sultanate of Makassar (Goa) in Southwest Sulawesi (1667/1669).28 The slave trade network in the archipelago revolved around the dual axis of Makassar and Bali. Makassar was the main transit port for slaves from Borneo (Kalimantan), Sulawesi, Buton (Butung), and the northeastern islands, as well as the eastern Tenggara islands (Lombok, Sumbawa, Bima, Manggarai, and Solor).29 The kingdoms of Bali were not only independent slave exporters, but also reexported slaves from eastern Indonesia as far as New Guinea (Irian Jaya). Of almost 10,000 Indonesian slaves brought to Batavia by Asian vessels between 1653 and 1682, 41.66% (4,086) came from South Sulawesi, 23.98% (2,352) from Bali, 12.07% (1,184) from Buton, 6.92% (679) from the Tenggara islands, and 6.79% (646) from Maluku (Ambon and Banda).30 Similar proportions could be found among Indonesian slaves in the other Dutch posts in the archipelago and at the Cape of Good Hope, where South Sulawesi contributed 46% and Bali 6.6% of the 166 Indonesian slaves imported in the last three decades of the seventeenth century. Between 1680 and 1731, 30.2% (201) of the 666 company slaves imported to the Cape came from Indonesia, 24.8% (165) from India, and 22.1% (147) from Madagascar and other parts of Africa.31 Between 1620 and 1830, Hindu Bali, internally divided among various rival states after the collapse of the kingdom of Gelgel, exported at least 100,000 members of its own population and neighboring Lombok, Sumbawa, Sumba, and elsewhere as slaves.3218
     The third circuit or subregion, the African mainland, Madagascar, and the Mascarene Islands (with a few notable exceptions) remained a relatively insignificant basis of supply for slaves throughout the seventeenth century. As long as supplies from the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia could meet demand, slaving voyages to the southwest Indian Ocean were avoided because of the region's peripheral location and marginal commercial importance in the VOC's overall intra-Asiatic trade network. East Africa and the islands off the continent's coast, however, were occasionally tapped into by the Cape Colony and by other company settlements for special projects. Several hundred Bantu-speaking slaves from West and Central Africa were imported in the Cape Colony after 1652 in the first decades of the colony's existence. In addition, 502 slaves were exported from Madagascar between 1641 and 1647. Between 1652 and 1699, 12 company-sponsored voyages were undertaken to Madagascar returning with 1,069 Malagasy slaves and one voyage to Dahomey with 226 slaves, a total of 13 voyages with 1,290 slaves. Malagasy slaves made up 24.1% of all slaves imported into the Cape during this period.33 In comparison, Madagascar supplied about 70% (31,076) of all 44,394 slaves reaching French Mauritius and Réunion between 1670 and 1769. The balance of imports came from Mozambique and the Swahili Coast (19% or 8,435), India (9% or 3,995), and West Africa (2% or 888).3419
     Dutch exports of Malagasy slaves pale in comparison with the French, Arab, Portuguese, and English slave trades from Madagascar in the seventeenth century. During the so-called "age of troubles," the French carried approximately 1,000 slaves from Madagascar to the Mascarene Islands between 1670 and 1714. Arab traders exported as many as 3,000 slaves per year from northwestern Madagascar, including 800-1,000 slaves to Oman, while at least 40 English voyages (mostly interlopers evading the monopoly of the Royal African Company on the west coast of Africa) left Madagascar to the New World between 1675 and 1700 with slaves as cargo.35 Apart from Batavia and the Cape Colony (including Mauritius), a significant portion of Dutch slave exports from Madagascar were intended for the company-operated gold mines along the west coast of Sumatra, where between 1670 and 1696 some 200-500 slaves toiled at Sillida and a few other mines nearby.3620
  

Markets of Demand: Destinations of Slaves

 
Influenced by "central place theory" or "location theory" of the German geographers Walter Cristaller and August Lösch, Fernand Braudel asserts that preindustrial world trade was urban-centered, consisting of an "archipelago of towns." A complex hierarchy of central places, from multifunctional "world-cities" to less specialized regional and local centers, serviced and drew on their respective hinterlands. Applying these concepts to the Indian Ocean, Chaudhuri points to the dominant role of the region's great trading emporia from the Swahili and Red Sea coasts to Southeast China littoral. This thalassic network of Indian Ocean port cities was linked by the sailing ship.37 In the case of the Northern European chartered companies, these central places in the East became, in the words of Philip Curtin, an integral part of "trading-post empires" and tightly controlled "militarized trade diasporas."3821
     During its first centuries, European expansion had a markedly, almost exclusively urban character. Port cities were the nexus of the maritime power of the Iberian state-run enterprises and the Northern European chartered companies. The Dutch Indian Ocean slave system was therefore urban-centered, concentrated around a small number of central places in areas where they exercised political authority "out of conquest," usually designated as "governments." Like the markets of supply, these markets of demand can be divided in three groups: Southeast Asia (including Malacca, westcoast of Sumatra, Jambi, Palembang, Bantam, Batavia and Java's north coast, Makassar, Ambon, Banda, and the Moluccas) South Asia (Surat, Malabar, Ceylon, Coromandel, and Bengal), and "greater South Africa" (Cape of Good Hope and various "outer factories").22
     The Southeast Asian group included Neira Town and the government of Banda (Banda and the southern Maluku Islands), Kotah Ambon and the government of Ambon (Ambon and neighboring islands), Ternate and the government of the Moluccas (northern Maluku Islands), Vlaardingen and the government of Makassar (Makasar and southwestern Sulawesi), Batavia, seat of the governor-general and the Council of the Indies (west and north Java littoral), and the city and government of Malacca (Melaka and its immediate environs on the Malaysian peninsula).23
     The South Asian group included Nagapatnam and Pulicat and the government of Coromandel (east coast of India), Colombo and the government of Ceylon (Jaffnapatnam and the lowlands of southwestern Sri Lanka), and Cochin and the "commandement" of Malabar (Cochin and several forts and guard stations in coastal Kerala). Greater South Africa consisted of the single case of Cape Town and (after 1690) the government of the Cape of Good Hope (the southwestern Cape and increasing sections of the dry interior of South Africa).3924
     All of these urban centers and their surroundings were true slave societies, in which slaves played an important part in both luxury and productive capacities, empowering particular groups of elites, deeply influenced cultural developments, and formed a high proportion (over 20-40%) of the total population (see Table 2 ). 41 Slaves accounted for 51.97% (16,695) and 56.93% (12,505) of the urban population of Batavia in 1679 and 1699, respectively. In 1694, the cities of Colombo and Kotah Ambon consisted of 53.36% (1,333) and 52.31% (2,870) slaves. In 1687 and 1697, 35.18% (649) and 42 .33% (938) of the households in Cochin consisted of slaves. The only figures available for Cape Town fall somewhat outside our time period, but are nevertheless revealing. In 1731, 42.22% (1,333) of the urban population of Cape Town were slaves. Somewhat deviant from the median are the cases of Malacca and Vlaardingen (Makassar). On the low end, Malacca (and its immediate surroundings) had a slave population of "only" 25.28% (1,134) and 40.07% (1,853) in 1680 and 1682, respectively. At the other extreme, 66.55% (921) of the population of the "hamlet" Vlaardingen consisted of forced laborers.42 In comparison, in the typical sugar islands of the Caribbean, 75-95% of the population were slaves, and most of the free people were of African descent. In the American South, generally, most people were not slaves at all, but colonists of European descent. 43 No statistically significant differences in regional patterns can be discerned between the urban slave societies of South Asia (Cochin and Colombo), Southeast Asia (Batavia, Kotah Ambon, Malacca, and Vlaardingen), and South Africa (Cape Town). Slavery was a defining component of Dutch colonial settlements throughout the Indian Ocean, grafted on the preexisting open system of slavery in the commercialized, cosmopolitan cities in Southeast Asia and elsewhere in the Indian Ocean.25


 
Table 2.Total population and slave population of various Dutch central places in the Indian Ocean in the late seventeenth century
Table 2
 

 
  

Routes to Slavery

 
Arriving in the Indian Ocean in the late sixteenth century, the Dutch took over and interacted with preexisting systems of slavery and dependency.44 Indigenous sources in the Indian Ocean prescribing the "peculiar institution" originated from three major traditions: Hindu, Muslim, and Southeast Asian. Throughout the Indian Ocean basin, however, there were significant geographical and chronological variations within each of these traditions.26
     The normative texts circumscribing routes to slavery in Hinduism were the law books (dharmasastras or smritis) of Manu and Narada. Manu "the Lawgiver" (third century B.C.E.), author of the prototypic dharma text, recognized seven types of slavery: persons (dasas) captured in battle; those enslaved in return for food; those born in the house of the master; those who are bought; those inherited as part of patrimony; those who are given away by their parents; and those enslaved for not paying a fine or in execution of a judicial decree. In one of the latest of the major dharmasastras, Narada (c. 300 C.E.) subdivided and added categories to bring the number up to fifteen, including a child whose adoption was defective, while another resulted from a lost wager. In addition, bondage for debt and nonpayment of taxes were introduced as separate categories.4527
     In Islam, the authoritative sources, the Qur'an, Shari'a, and (to Sunni Muslims only) the innumerable hadiths (traditions), recognized four main ways of recruitment of slaves (‘Abd): capture of infidels in holy struggle (jihad) against the "Abode of War" (dar al-Harb), tribute (bakt) required from vassal states beyond the Islamic frontiers, offspring from or birth to slave parents, and purchase by slave merchants known as "importers" or "cattle-dealers." Raids and petty warfare by Muslims could at best be interpreted as a genuine jihad or holy war to extend the faith. In 1669, for instance, the Pangeran Dipati of Jambi, a Muslim port city on the east coast of Sumatra, justified the equipping of armed vessels for a slave raid against Ujang Salangh on the Malaysian Peninsula arguing that the inhabitants "were heathens, and hence [the raiding] could not be considered an injustice." At worst, however, these expeditions represented ruthless raiding for helpless human prey and continued on all the boundaries of Islamic communities throughout the Indian Ocean basin.4628
     The Southeast Asian legal codes (Bugi, Malay, Javanese, and other texts, such as the Undang-undang Melaka, Agama Djawa, or Adat Aceh) were based on ancient Indian dharmasastras, Islamic law books, decrees issued by the ruler in power, and numerous local traditions (adat). Though widely differing, they commonly acknowledged five paths by which a person could enter a state of bondage: inheriting the bondage of one's parents; sale into bondage by parents, husband, or oneself; capture in war or raids; judicial punishment (or inability to pay fines); and, most importantly, failure to meet debts. Debts were acquired through trading, gambling, inability to pay for the ceremonies associated with rites of passage (naming ceremony, initiation, marriage, funeral, and so forth), and crop failure or other calamity.4729
     Grafting on these preexisting indigenous traditions, the Dutch brought with them an intellectual, theoretical mentalité steeped in Christian humanism mixed with a healthy doses of pragmatism.48 In the Dutch Republic, majority apologists (moderate Calvinist ministers, theologians, and jurists) used biblical references and sources of classical antiquity to produce a specific slaving discourse with a Protestant face. The so-called "Ham ideology" based on the curse of Canaan (Genesis 9:25-27) served as the most important biblical justification for the enslavement of Africans and Asians until the nineteenth century emancipation.49 The authority of the Old and New Testaments was supplemented by the writings of Greco-Roman authors, condoning slavery "within natural limits" or under certain safeguards stated in company ordinances. Dutch jurists, such as Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), recognized voluntary sale in order to escape famine and starvation, capture in a just war (bellum iustum), judicial slavery as an alternative to execution, and inheritance or birth from a female slave.5030
     Whereas ideological motivations on a theoretical plane dominated discourse in Europe, in Asia slavery found virtually universal acceptance on a practical level among self-righteous religious, military, and civil officials of the Dutch East India Company. Using reasons of state or pragmatic politics to defend the trade, these company servants rather opportunistically resorted to a variety of ad hoc arguments in an unsystematic manner. These arguments included Christian humanitarian compassion (saving the body and soul of the slave), the need to establish and populate settlement colonies ("peuplatie"), the right of war and conquest (bellum iustum), the "uncivilized" nature of the "servile" indigenous peoples, natural, contractual law (pacta sunct servanda), and financial-budgetary considerations ("mesnagie"). To God-fearing Calvinists in patria and overseas, the enslavements of African and Asian peoples did create a serious moral predicament for both opponents and apologists alike. Torn between gain and godliness, or the practical temptations of the "Dutch trading empire" and the principle requirements of the "Empire of Christ," the "peculiar institution" was carefully circumscribed, permissible only "for good and sufficient reasons" and "within natural limits" under certain safeguards punctiliously stated in company ordinances.5131
     The Dutch acquired the majority of their slaves indirectly through purchase from indigenous suppliers, which, similar to the other universal religions of Buddhism and Islam, was rendered in religious humanitarian terms as a "work of Christian compassion" (christelijcke mededogentheyt) based on the alleged material and spiritual salvation of the individual slave's body and soul. Apart from saving people from physical starvation in instances of severe famine, enslavement also allegedly saved the soul of infidels ensnared in the trappings of the devil.52 Enslavement of company subjects via debt bondage, however, was prohibited (with little success) in numerous ordinances as "contrary to all divine and Christian laws and unacceptable to the high authorities."5332
     Numerous armed conflicts with indigenous societies also provided a major source of captive labor. In accordance with prevailing mercantilist thought and a paranoid siege mentality, these conflicts were invariably depicted by the righteous Dutch as just wars. In theory, the company only accepted legally acquired slaves and rejected those acquired via outright kidnapping and robbery. In practice, however, the Dutch distinction between legal acquisition and illegal kidnapping and robbery was as nebulous as the Muslim differentiation between "true slaves" (Arabic ‘abd) resulting from genuine jihad and ruthless raiding for helpless human prey.5433
     In addition, "rebellious" peoples, once subdued, were often forced at gunpoint to sign treaties with slave clauses, promising the delivery of a fixed number of slaves and other commodities as fine or tribute (boete ofte amende). The symbolic exchange of gifts reestablished relationships and reordered the proper hierarchy between individuals, groups, and the "honorable" company. Between 1650 and 1675 alone, the Dutch concluded numerous slave-clause agreements with indigenous chiefs and headmen (orangkayas, penghulus, sangajis, and so forth) on and near the islands of Sumatra, Timor, New Guinea, and Sulawesi.5534
     According to Dutch Roman law, slavery was hereditary through the female "on the principle that the fruit follows after the womb." Offspring from female slaves, however, was a relatively insignificant source of captive labor due to low levels of reproduction among slave populations. Despite several "moments of creolization" (when the slave population was more than 50% locally born), the gender imbalance among slaves (i.e., an overwhelming preponderance of male slaves especially among non-company slaves), high mortality rates, and poor living and working conditions limited female fertility and weighed heavily against natural reproduction.5635
     In 1682, for instance, the slave population of Malacca consisted of 1,589 adults (880 men and 709 women) and 264 children, an adult-to-child ratio of 6.0:1 (see Table 3 ). In 1687, the Cape slave population consisted of 758 adults (503 men and 253 women) and 145 children (ratio 5.2:1), while the Dutch settlements along the Malabar coast (Cochin, Quilon, Cannanur, Cranganur, and Pallipuram) had 716 adults (536 men and 180 women) and 137 children (ratio 5.2:1). In 1688, the slave population of Ambon consisted of 8,335 adults (4,446 men and 3,889 women) and 2,381 children (ratio 3.5:1), whereas Banda had 3,213 adults (1,631 men and 1,582 women) and 503 children (ratio 6.4:1). In 1689, the slave population of Batavia consisted of 22,570 adults (12,557 men and 10,013 women) and 3,501 children (ratio 6.4:1). 57 36


 
Table 3.Gender and age composition of slave populations in various company settlements in the late seventeenth century
Table 3
    * The Zuidervoorstad (southern suburbs) excluded.
    Source: See footnote 58
 

 
     Judicial punishment, in the form of political exiles and convicts (gecondemneerden or bandieten), represented a small, but distinct category.59 The ordinances issued by company authorities in Batavia, Ceylon, the Cape, and elsewhere contain numerous references in which transgressors, such as captured runaway slaves, are condemned to chain labor for specified terms at the public works (ad opus publicum).60 Batavia, Colombo, Robben Island off the coast of South Africa, and Rozengain, one of the Banda Islands, served as special penal colonies for several hundreds of convicts.6137
     Throughout the Indian Ocean, war captives came largely from animist, stateless societies of shifting cultivators or hunter-gatherers and microstates too weak to defend themselves against the stronger and wealthier societies of the cities and the rice-growing lowlands. Sometimes non-Muslim societies and hill peoples sold the victims of their own internal warring; more often they were simply raided for slaves by outsiders. In Southeast Asia, these so-called "victim societies" included, among others, the Papuas of New Guinea; the Alfurs of Maluku, northern Sulawesi, and Mindanao; the Torajas and Mandars of Southwest Sulawesi; the Dayaks of Borneo; the Minangkabau and Bataks of Sumatra; and the Orang Asli (lit., "original peoples") of Malaysia. These groups enslaved each other in low-scale, endemic intercommunal conflict or were enslaved by neighboring (often Muslim) states, such as the sultanates of Ternate and Tidore in eastern Indonesia; Magindanao on the island of Mindanao; Makassar (Goa) and Bone on Sulawesi; Aceh, Jambi, and Palembang on Sumatra; and Johore on the Malaysian peninsula.38
     Oftentimes, the slaving frontier coincided with the juxtaposition of upstream and downstream (ulu-ilir). Somewhere between 500 and 200 B.C.E., coastal communities in Sumatra, Borneo, Malaya, and elsewhere started acting as downstream, "gatekeeper" polities for the upstream interior in the larger drainage systems of the region.62 Upstream and downstream communities were distanced by geography, language, and customs, but nonetheless drawn together by politico-economic ties between the interior and coastal centers.6339
     South Asian slavery appears to have originated in the Aryan conquest (after 1500 B.C.E.) and assimilation into the caste structure of autochthonous peoples who were enslaved as dasas. Similar to the upstream-downstream division in Southeast Asia, the "inner frontier" in South Asia separated tribal peoples (adivasis) of hunter-gatherers, shifting cultivators, and pastoral nomads in the interior forest and hill tracts from the sedentary wet-rice farmers of the coastal and riverine floodplains. With the expansion of the agricultural frontier in the medieval and early modern period, these forest and pastoral peoples were reduced, along with war captives and other outsiders without community protection, to various degrees of dependency upon landed households of higher standing.64 Slaving also occurred intermittently along the Muslim-Hindu "frontier" in South Asia, starting with the numerous pillaging expeditions of Mahmud of Ghazni into the subcontinent between 1000 and 1025 C.E., and continued throughout the periods of the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526) and the Mughal Empire (1526-1857). Mughal policy alternated between pragmatism and orthodoxy, represented most clearly in the reigns of Akbar (r. 1556-1605) and Aurangzeb (r. 1658-1707), respectively. The term "Muslim-Hindu frontier," however, should be used with caution. It implies a rather precise line where none existed. Muslims ruled over Muslims and non-Muslim subject populations all over South Asia. In fact, the Indo-Islamic ulama was deeply divided between pragmatism, personified by "Akbar's intellectual" Abu'l Fazl Allami (1551-1602), and orthodoxy, represented by the leader of the Muslim opposition to Akbar, Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624), over how non-Muslims should be treated.6540
     Frequent warfare among the major confederations and kingdoms on Madagascar (Sakalava, Tsitambala, and Merina), compounded by the rise of militant Islamic sultanates such as Maselagache on the northwest coast of the island, led to a steady stream of captive humanity throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The hereditary slave caste (andevo) of the highland Merina, for instance, was supplemented by war or slave-raiding, judicial punishment, and debt bondage.66 On the African mainland, non-Muslim, Bantu-speaking peoples of the interior of east and central Africa fell victim to slave raiding by rival Muslim and Afro-Portuguese coastal networks. The real takeoff in the southwest Indian Ocean, however, did not occur until the late eighteenth century with the rapid expansion of Omani and French agricultural plantations, the demand of Brazilian merchants, and a series of severe droughts and epidemics.67 No slavery existed in South Africa prior to the arrival of the Europeans among the local Khoikhoi and San populations. Slaves therefore had to be imported from outside. In the pastoral region of the Cape Colony, however, increasing numbers of Khoikhoi and San on the interior "highveld" were dispossessed and employed by Dutch colonists as indentured laborers in the eighteenth century. Though this system of "inbooking" (inboekstelsel) was not formalized until 1775, local company magistrates approved of the practice long before this date.6841
     Inheritance and judicial punishment were the most common sources of forced labor in the closed systems where a money economy was little developed. There existed, however, no institutional obstacles against the sale of slaves on a massive scale once a strong external demand made itself felt along with the spread of a money economy in the absence of a strong state. All major indigenous powers prohibited the export of slaves as an intolerable loss of the country's most precious resource and a violation of the collective moral code of society. On the Indian subcontinent, for instance, the Dutch encountered difficulties with the Mughals and Marathas in the north and the Nayaka rulers in the south opposing the slaving activities of the Europeans. In 1643, for instance, the ruler of Senji, Krishnappa Nayaka, lectured a visiting Dutch envoy-Calvinist minister "that selling human beings was not only disgraceful to the world, but was also considered one of the greatest sins by our gods." In Southeast Asia, with the completion of the process of Islamization of Java and expansion of the state of Mataram in the sixteenth century, the island ceased to export its people. No slaves were exported from South Sulawesi during the height of the sultanate of Makasar (1600-68).6942
     Sale and indebtedness were more important routes to slavery in the cities and other areas open to the money economy. Debts were, as we have seen, an important source of bondage, whether acquired through trading, gambling, inability to pay for the ceremonies associated with rites of passage, crop failure, or other calamity. The prominence of debt and judicial slavery seems to be distinctive in the Southeast Asian pattern. Sale into bondage in times of famine was more prevalent in South Asia and China.7043
     Slaves were transported to Dutch settlements by company ships or other European slavers, free burgher vessels, and Asian craft. Special slaving voyages were occasionally undertaken by the company in times of great demand or for special projects, though normally "pieces" of slaves were stowed as supplementary cargo on board Dutch East India ships along with other commodities. Company officials as private individuals also engaged in the legal and illegal slave trade. Foreign slavers would occasionally sell some of their forced labor when calling at one of the VOC ports en route to their ultimate destination. Free burgher and Asian merchants (rulers, nobility, and commoners) routinely carried slaves throughout the Indian Ocean as part of the so-called country or intra-Asian trade.44
  

Slave Occupations

 
Slaves were general laborers and used in a wide variety of occupations in the Dutch slave societies across the Indian Ocean basin. Specialization among private and company slaves, however, occurred in accordance with the size of the individual slave household and the particular position the settlement occupied within the company's overall trade network. The majority of slaves acted as domestic servants in small or large slave households of company officials, free burghers, and Asian subjects in areas under Dutch jurisdiction. They served as cooks, lamplighters, houseboys, housemaids, concubines, seamstresses, bread bakers, tea makers, coachmen, musicians, masseuses, honor guards, valets, and so forth.71 They performed menial labor as coolies in the construction of fortifications, buildings, roads, canals, and trenches, and as porters and stevedores in the ports and warehouses.45
     In agriculture, slaves grew food crops (rice, wheat, potatoes, and vegetables), cash crops (pepper, nutmeg and mace, cloves, sugar, cotton, tobacco, and grapes), and herded cattle and sheep. In mining, slaves dug for gold, tin, and other minerals, and broke coral stone for the burning of lime. They served as fishermen, sailors, and country traders in the intra-Asiatic trade. In manufacturing, slaves labored in artisan workshops as carpenters, furniture makers, coopers, tailors, cobblers, gold-, silver-, and blacksmiths, and numerous other artisanal occupations. They worked in gunpowder mills, sulfur and saltpeter refineries, arak distilleries, sawmills, shipyards, and sugar mills. In the service sector, they were active in retail, (lower) administrative functions, medical professions (nurses, midwives, etc.), and so forth. Political exiles and criminals (gecondemneerden and bandieten), the result of judicial punishment, formed a small but separate category. Invariably, they were condemned to perform hard physical labor at the public works (ad opus publicum) at the company's fortifications or elsewhere often as part of a chain gang.46
     In Batavia, the administrative center, central rendezvous, and port of transshipment of the VOC in Asia, several hundred company slaves served on the island of Onrust's (Pulau Kapal) shipyards to repair and service the visiting Dutch East Indiamen, while others worked in the company hospitals. In the environs of Batavia, thousands of Asian and free burgher slaves cultivated the sugar, rice, and pepper gardens in the late seventeenth century.72 In eastern Indonesia, the center of spice production, thousands of free burgher and Asian slaves worked the clove gardens in Ambon and the nutmeg plantations in Banda. In 1694, for instance, 1,879 free burgher slaves labored on the some 70 nutmeg gardens or perken of Banda, though 2,500 were deemed necessary.7347
     At Malacca, a vital port of transshipment in the VOC's intra-Asiatic trade network, the majority of the 207 company slaves in 1662 were held in the "Slave Castle" (Slavenburgh) as a flexible pool of labor "for the loading and unloading of the ships and elsewhere where needed." In 1678, 53 out of 187 company slaves were directly employed "in the chain gang on the common works." It was recommended, however, that "[a]ll slaves, both men and women ... shall, if occasion arises for something to be done quickly, whether the unloading or loading of ships or anything else, be united with the common gang and employed where they are needed."7448
     In the 1660s and early 1670s, when the company tried to achieve self-sufficiency on Ceylon, over 2,000 company slaves worked the fields around Galle and Colombo in the southwest of the island, growing rice, nacheri (fine cereal), cotton, tobacco, potatoes, and other crops. In Colombo, seat of the Dutch governor and council of Ceylon, 533 adult slaves (including 348 females) and 196 slave children served as fortification workers in 1685, carrying bricks, lime, and earth to the city's and castle's ramparts.7549
     At the Cape of Good Hope, the vast majority of the 300 company slaves tilled the 40-acre urban vegetable garden in Cape Town, while hundreds of free burgher slaves worked on the intensive wheat and wine farms in the southwestern Cape. Smaller numbers herded the free burgher livestock in the pastoral regions to the north and east, though the preference here was to recruit the local Khoikhoi and San populations.7650
     The division of slave labor roughly followed ethnic, gender, and age lines based on colonial taxonomy and preexisting indigenous beliefs and practices that characterized local slave systems. Comparative psycho-physiology decided the typical qualities and defects assigned to representatives of the various races and, in consequence, the functions for which they were considered best suited. Administrative ethnography and categorization, however, should be treated with caution since labels could be deceptive or misleading due to miscegenation, political expediency, and other reasons. Moreover, ethnic stereotyping or racial profiling differed in each company settlement and changed over time. Nevertheless, Indian and Southeast Asian slaves in general were deemed to be cleaner, more intelligent, and less suited to hard physical labor than African slaves.77 Indian and Southeast Asian slaves therefore frequently worked as artisans or domestic servants, while African slaves commonly served as field laborers. Despite the importance of "context-dependent particulars" and local variations, slave women were not used regularly in fieldwork, but were mostly involved in domestic labor as housemaids, specialized seamstresses and knitters, laundresses, or wet-nurses.78 Slave children could be employed in seasonal work, such as sheaf-binding or domestic occupations, serving as "companions" to their master's children, guarding younger white children or babies. At the Cape, older farm slaves often worked with the livestock either as shepherds or leading the oxen in plowing.7951
  

Size of Dutch Slavery and Volume of the Slave Trade

 
The number of company and total Dutch slaves and the accompanying volume of the annual slave trades were subject to great volatility and varied greatly from year to year. Famine, wars, epidemics, and natural disasters could wreak havoc among local slave populations, already tending to melt away due to high mortality rates, low levels of self-reproduction or creolization, manumission, and widespread desertion. As has been noted by many scholars, there is no slavery without the slave trade because of the long-term demographic imbalance. Mortality rates in most of the company settlements in Southeast Asia were significantly higher compared to those at the Cape, and, to an even greater degree, in South Asia.8052
     In Ambon, ruthless wars (1618, 1625, 1636-37, 1641-46, 1650-56, 1658-61, 1680-81) and recurring malaria epidemics (1633-34, 1651, 1656-58, 1666, 1671-72, 1677-78, 1682-84, 1689-91) occasionally ravaged all groups of the population, including slaves. Continuous raiding by Alfurese "headhunters" in southwest Ceram, outward migration, and a massive earthquake followed by a tidal wave (1674) further exacerbated the existing demographic problems. Between 1643 and 1671, the population of Ambon (Hitu, Larike, Hitu Tenggara, and Leitimor), the Lease Islands (Haruku, Saparua, and Nusalaut), Western Islands (Ambelau, Buru, Boano, Manipa, and Kelang), and southwest Ceram declined with approximately 30,000, or 37%, recovering only moderately until 1691 (approximately 1% growth annually), and stabilizing in the period afterward (1692-1708).8153
     In Banda, the original population was deported, driven away, starved to death, or massacred by the company in 1621 and replaced by Dutch colonists or perkeniers using slave labor. The worst malaria epidemics generally followed volcanic eruptions. In 1638, 375 people died in Neira Town alone. In 1678, 376 people died in the Dutch government of Banda altogether. In 1693, 771 people died, including "very many slaves" in the nutmeg gardens or perken. In 1702, 351 free burgher slaves died and subsequently 356 had to be imported from eastern Indonesia in order to replace them.8254
     Southwestern Ceylon was plagued by intermittent warfare and hostilities with the interior kingdom of Kandy (1670-75) and recurrent droughts or floods (1659, 1661, 1664, 1669, and 1673), spreading famine and disease across the island. In 1661, for instance, 900 slaves died, including 400 "old and nearly worn out people." In 1669, large numbers of people were dying in the lands of Colombo. The 100 Dutchmen and 800 slaves reportedly being treated in the local company hospitals were hardly better off, since these facilities were often virtual death traps.8355
     Batavia and its environs were the scene of several wars involving the Javanese states of Mataram (1628-29, 1677-81) and Bantam (1619, 1633-39, 1656-59, 1680-83), and increasingly virulent diseases (especially malaria) due to natural and human-induced changes in the local environment. Between 1676 and 1677, for instance, during hostilities involving Mataram, the slave population inside Batavia declined from 17,279 to 15,776. Between 1688 and 1690, diseases reduced the number of slaves inside the city (excluding the Zuidervoorstad) from 12,125 to 11,172. In August and September 1688 alone, over 1,000 people "of all nations" died in Batavia due to "an evil form of measles and smallpox." High mortality rates in Batavia were compounded by cramped living conditions and the practice of housing domestic slaves in rooms without air circulation.8456
     Barring unexpected high mortality, the number of company slaves was overall relatively stable. At times, however, drastic changes could occur as a result of policy decisions. Following the completion of the local fortifications, the number of company slaves at Batavia between 1664 and 1671 was reduced by one-third from 1,519 to 1,008. The cuts apparently were too deep and the company was subsequently forced to hire 500 slaves from private persons. To reduce expenses, the high government in January 1678 decided to employ more company slaves.85 More permanent was the decision to decrease the number of company slaves in Ceylon as part of a series of budgetary measures. Between 1677 and 1679, the number of company slaves at Ceylon was slashed almost in half from 3,932 to approximately 2,000, respectively. Some old slaves were manumitted against payment, while the rest were sent to Batavia and Malacca. Even in Colombo, the company was subsequently forced to hire 500 Christian Paravas from southeast India as coolies to help strengthen Ceylon fortifications.8657
     Whereas the slave population of the company and its officials as private individuals was relatively stable, that of European and Asian subjects in areas under company jurisdiction displayed a distinct secular upward trend, growing throughout the seventeenth and the early eighteenth centuries. Only in the late eighteenth century did the number of slaves in Dutch "conquests" drop dramatically along with the declining fortunes of the VOC.58
     A sample from the late seventeenth century provides some valuable insights into the number of company and total Dutch slaves and the accompanying volume of the annual slave trades. The numbers presented here are, to borrow a phrase from Ralph Austen, in the form of a "tentative census." 87 Future archival research will refine the estimates for various VOC settlements. In 1688, there were about 4,000 company slaves and perhaps 66,000 total Dutch slaves in the various settlements spread out across the Indian Ocean basin (see Table 4 ). Not surprisingly, the two most important VOC settlements, Ceylon (1,500) and Batavia (1,400), accounted for the bulk of the 4,000 company slaves, with the Cape of Good Hope (382), Banda (166), Malacca (161), and Makassar (112) as important secondary centers of forced labor. Batavia (26,000) and Ambon (10,500) made up over half of the total of 66,000 Dutch slaves, with Ceylon (4,000), Banda (3,700), Malacca (1,800), and Makassar (1,500) as significant second-rank slaveholding societies. The number of slaves in South Asia was much smaller than in Southeast Asia and greater South Africa due to the ability to compel "free" populations to perform labor services as part of their caste obligations or to demand extraordinary services from resident foreign communities.59


 
Table 4.Number of company slaves and total Dutch slaves along with estimates of the size of the accompanying annual slave trades, ca. 1688
Table 4
    a With the exception of the Cape of Good Hope, all figures on company slaves are derived from Gaastra, De geschiedenis van de VOC, pp. 84-85, 94.
    b According to Knaap, 8-9% of the total number of slaves in Ambon were imported each year. See Knaap, Kruidnagelen en christenen, pp. 107, 132.
    c In 1680, the company estimated that annually 150-200 slaves had to be imported in Banda. See Generale Missive IV, p. 431. According to Jacobs, in the eighteenth century more than 100 slaves had to be imported each year in Banda in order to compensate for the losses due to deaths and desertions. See Jacobs, Koopman in Azië, p. 26.
    d Prior to 1733, mortality rates in Batavia and Ceylon ranged between 5 and 10%. See Van der Brug, Malaria en Malaise, p. 59. According to Reid, about 1,000 slaves per year may have been imported on average into Batavia in the seventeenth century, though this figure seems to be on the low side for 1689. See Anthony Reid, "Introduction: Slavery and Bondage in Southeast Asian History," p. 29. In 1671, in the aftermath of the campaigns waged by the company and its allies against Makassar, 1,584 slaves were imported in Batavia by Asian ships. In 1720, 2,149 slaves were imported legally into Batavia. Raben, "Batavia and Colombo," p. 122; Generale Missiven VII, pp. 579, 581.
    e According to Armstrong and Worden, for most of the eighteenth century 100-200 slaves were imported into the Cape by the burghers and company officials (excluding those imported by the company for its own use). See Armstrong and Worden, "The Slaves, 1652-1834," p. 120. According to Shell, 63,000 slaves were imported into the Cape between 1652 and 1808, 5,400 of those by the company between 1652 and 1795. By 1717 2,579 slaves (40 per year) had been imported by the company and 3,997 slaves (60 per year) by free burghers and local officials (total of 6,576 or 100 per year). See Shell, Children of Bondage, pp. 4, 40-41, 68.
    f With the exclusion of Matura.
    g In 1694, the city of Colombo alone had a slave population of 1,761. See Knaap, "Europeans, Mestizos and Slaves," p. 88. In 1661, 10,000 slaves had been put to work by the company and by private individuals on the lands in southwestern Ceylon, including 2,000 company slaves. Due to poor conditions, manumission, and budgetary measures of the late 1670s the number of slaves decreased rapidly thereafter. VOC 1234, fls. 125r-v, Miss. Gouvr. Van Goens aan H. XVII, 5.4.1661.
    h In 1676, the city of Vlaardingen alone had a slave population of 921 out of 1,384 inhabitants. Vlaardingen had 1,125 and 2,929 inhabitants in 1679 and 1694, respectively, with 58% of the population (c. 2,500 based on interpolation) reportedly being slaves in 1688.
    i In 1687, Cochin, the seat of the Dutch commander and council and main Dutch settlement on the Malabar coast, had (excluding the Asian population) 1,845 inhabitants, including 649 slaves (plus 142 free women and 24 free household servants). The other company settlements (Quilon, Cannanur, Cranganur, and Pallipuram) had 704 inhabitants, including 204 slaves. VOC 1434, OBP 1688, fls. 263v-265v, Samentrekking huisgezinnen, 17.12.1687; s'Jacob, "De VOC en de Malabarkust in de 17de Eeuw," p. 88.
    j The mortality rates in Malabar in 1768-69 among VOC personnel was 5%. Van der Brug, Malaria en Malaise, Table B, p. 29.
    k There were 330 male slaves in the Moluccas in 1686 along with 385 (free and enslaved) women and children. Generale Missiven V, p. 33.
    l In 1687/88, the other company settlements (Amoy, Bantam, Bengal, Coromandel, Jambi, Japan, Japara, Palembang, Persia, Siam, Sumatra, Surat, Timor, and Tonkin) had 2,839 European VOC servants, 24.58% of the total of 11,551.
 

 
     To replenish or increase these numbers, 200-400 company slaves and 3,730-6,430 total Dutch slaves had to be imported each year. Assuming average mortality rates en route of circa 20% on slaving voyages, 240-480 company and 4,476-7,716 total Dutch slaves were exported annually from their respective catchment area.88 To place these numbers in a comparative global perspective, 9,500 slaves were exported each year in the trans-Saharan slave trade in the seventeenth century; 3,000 slaves were shipped annually from the Swahili and Red Sea coasts during the same time period. In addition, 29,124 slaves were exported each year in the Atlantic slave trade during the last quarter of the seventeenth century, 2,888 of which transported by the Dutch West India Company. The exact volume of the Crimean Tatar trade in Polish and Russian slaves is impossible to gauge, though one (inflated) estimate suggests that in the seventeenth century Poland lost an average of 20,000 captives yearly. In the period 1607-17 the Tatars may have seized 100,000 Russians and in the next 30 years another 100,000.89 The volume of the total Dutch Indian Ocean slave trade was therefore 15-30% of the Atlantic slave trade, slightly smaller than the trans-Saharan slave trade, and one-and-a-half to three times the size of the Swahili and Red Sea coast and the Dutch West India Company slave trades.60
  

Slave Resistance and Slave Revolt

 
With some notable exceptions, relationships of power in Dutch territories were tilted too heavily in favor of the owners for a large or even a medium-scale slave revolt to break out. The virtual absence of concerted mass slave rebellions in the face of slave-owner hegemony does not mean, of course, that the slaves meekly acquiesced in their subordination. Resorting to what James C. Scott has called the "weapons of the weak," they expressed their discontent in a variety of everyday forms of resistance, but above all by marooning or deserting.9061
     Using Eugene Genovese's list of preconditions favoring "massive revolts and guerilla warfare," numerous factors worked against any large-scale slave rebellion in Dutch-controlled territories throughout the Indian Ocean basin.91 First, the nature of the master-slave relationship was by and large immediate and personalized. Though the incidence of absenteeism was probably higher than most historians have assumed, there appears to have been no serious cultural estrangement between "white" and "black." In fact, "Low Portuguese" and Malay were the means of communication between master and slave in Batavia, Ceylon, the Cape, and elsewhere.92 Second, despite several booms and busts in the economies of Dutch colonial settlements, there were only occasional signs of serious distress and famine due to inadequate local food production and/or external sources of supply. In fact, the high government was very conscious in assuring plentiful rice supplies and low prices at Batavia and the "outer factories" in order to forestall bread riots and other forms of social unrest.93 Third, the small size of slaveholding units in Dutch conquests worked against any massive slave insurrection. Unlike the sugar colonies in the New World with an average size of 100 to 200 slaves per owner,94 few slave owners in the Indian Ocean had more than 100 slaves. In 1688, for instance, the 88 perkeniers of the nutmeg gardens on Banda owned 2,149 slaves, an average of less than 25. Some 25 small perkeniers only had 6, 8, or 10 slaves. In the same year, the average married household in Stellenbosch district at the Cape consisted of 6.3 individuals, including free burghers, VOC-knechts, and slaves. Most of the wine farms owned between 5 and 20 slaves, some farms having only 1 or 2 slaves.9562
Fourth, despite politico-economic tensions between private settlers or burghers and VOC leadership, the basic fabric of colonial society was never seriously threatened. The exceptions to the rule at the Cape are the affair that led to the sacking of Governor Willem Adriaen van der Stel in 1707, the Barbier rebellion of 1739, and the Patriot movement of the 1780s.96 Though the Patriot movement had little impact on the citizenry of Batavia, during the early history of the Dutch Asian headquarters a burgher movement lobbied for a city government, a Council of Aldermen (Schepenbank) of their own, which could not be manipulated by presiding company officials. The letter, which they sent in 1649 directly to the States General of the Dutch Republic (effectively bypassing the high government in Batavia and the VOC directors in Amsterdam), in fact represented the culmination of a long-standing feud between the burghers and company authorities, which had been fermenting since the founding of Batavia in 1619. All requests from the Batavian citizenry, however, were brushed aside. They had to live under institutions, which were similar in name only to those back in Holland, presided over by company officials, mostly members from the Council of the Indies. Henceforth, the free burghers lived subject to the whims of the successive governors general.9763
     Fifth, although slaves generally outnumbered the whites, the slave/master ratio was never sufficiently tilted especially when including local Asian populations under Dutch jurisdiction. Unfortunately, exact numbers on the subject populations in Dutch conquests are lacking, but they acted as a significant corrective to the owner/slave ratio among the other groups. Sixth, despite "moments of creolization," foreign-born slaves decisively outnumbered the creole slaves born locally into servitude. These foreign-born slaves came from a variety of cultural backgrounds and hence were internally divided along ethnic, linguistic, and religious lines. The chance of a general slave revolt was minimal in the absence of a unified slave cultural identity.98 Seventh, the social structure of the slaveholding regime did not permit the emergence of an autonomous black leadership. Eighth, though the geographical, social, and political environment provided terrain and opportunity for the formation of colonies of runaway slaves, they never grew to the size necessary to threaten the colonial regime. The largest maroon communities consisted of at most 60 men and women. Moreover, the possibility of flight encouraged escape and flight rather than revolt.64
     In Batavia, the one example of revolt involved a Muslim aristocrat from Manipa (near Ambon) called Captain Jonker, who commanded the VOC's Ambonese soldiers. In 1689, it was discovered that Jonker had joined with other opponents (Makasarese, Bugis, and Bantenese) of the company in plotting a massacre of the Europeans in the Dutch Asian headquarters. Upon discovering the plot the VOC attempted to arrest Jonker, but he broke into open plunder and murder and was caught and killed only after a pursuit. His followers then fled inland to Kartasura, where they at first found refuge with the local Javanese ruler, Amangkurat II. A few months later, however, some fifty of the conspirators were handed over to the VOC, which summarily executed them. Apart from political, religious, and ethnic overtones, the Jonker revolt clearly had some elements of a social protest movement since thirty-one of the conspirators' slaves were subsequently banished to Ceylon.99 A deep and lasting slump in the sugar industry, failing administrative institutions, high-handed measures, and corruption instigated the insurgency of Chinese laborers on the sugar plantations around Batavia in 1740 and the subsequent massacre of the 10,000 Chinese townsmen in the Dutch Asian headquarters.100 In 1710, a slave conspiracy was discovered "through God's special mercy" on Banda Neira. The slaves' intention was to burn and kill everything and everyone, seize several vessels, and escape in the ensuing confusion. Thirteen of the leaders were apprehended and sent in chains to the small penal colony on Rozengain Island.10165
     There is no evidence of slave revolts in the Cape Colony in the seventeenth century. The only two revolts occurred in the western Cape after the British takeover in 1806, motivated by the frustrations slaves felt at the slow pace of amelioration and emancipation. The 1808 Malmesbury revolt was partially a response to rumors that the recent abolition of the international slave trade (1806) would lead to general emancipation, whereas the 1825 Bokkeveld uprising was similarly the outcome of rumors of emancipation and the general uncertainty of government policy toward slaves. Both revolts united the white Anglo-Boer élites and were quickly suppressed.10266
     In the absence of large-scale revolts, slave responses assumed a variety of everyday forms of resistance: slowness at work; breaking farm equipment and household possessions; refusal to obey orders; stealing food, clothing, or other commodities; arson of crops or property; poisoning owners, open particularly to those who prepared the master's food; running amok, assault or physical attacks on masters or innocent bystanders; "escapism" in alcohol, drugs, and gambling manifested in drinking arak, smoking opium, holding cockfights, and throwing dice; and suicide, the most tragic form of slave response and the ultimate "theft" of the master's property.10367
     The most common form of resistance, however, was marooning or escape. Where there was slavery, there was desertion.104 Similar to many parts of the Atlantic plantation complex, slave escapes started virtually simultaneously with the introduction of captive labor in all the Dutch settlements throughout the Indian Ocean basin. A substantial majority of these desertions were acts of petit maroonage, lasting less than one month. Though some escapes were planned, the majority of these attempts were not premeditated but were immediate responses to some point of crisis: either punishment or fear of punishment often induced slaves to run away. The great majority of fugitives were adult males, who also tended to be the relatively recent arrivals in the colony. Small communities of runaway slaves (samenrottende slaven) sprung up throughout the Indian Ocean basin mostly in inaccessible mountainous, wooded areas in the interstital no-man's-land separating Dutch conquests from regions held by independent rulers and headmen. Maroon communities lived in parasitic coexistence on the margins of nearby slave societies, raiding and trading for food, clothing, and weapons.68
     In greater South Africa, slaves first reached Mauritius shortly after its initial occupation by the VOC in 1638. Maroonage became part of the colony's social and economic landscape no later than 1642, when 52 of 105 forced laborers brought to the island that year fled into the island's heavily wooded interior shortly after arrival. The first recorded slave escape at the Cape itself was in 1655, three years after the founding of the colony. Table Mountain, Hangklip promontory, and other mountains on the Cape Peninsula in the vicinity of Cape Town became regular hideaways for runaway slaves. The longest surviving and largest maroon community (about 50 runaway slaves) in the Cape Colony, established by a runaway Buginese slave named Leander, was near Hangklip or Cape False, which existed from the 1720s to the Emancipation Act of 1833.10569
     As early as 1622, three years after the founding of Batavia, complaints were voiced about the troubles caused by runaway slaves committing robbery in the forested lands nearby. One particular street in the city was even called "path of absconders" (Drosserspad or Gang Patjenongan) after the numerous slaves using it as their road to freedom. Like many other slaves, Surapati (d. 1706), a Balinese slave who had lived in Batavia, escaped to the highlands south of Batavia and became the leader of a band of brigands. In 1684, Surapati and his followers attacked a VOC force near Batavia and were joined by a party from the Javanese court of Kartasura in a massacre of a Dutch embassy to that court in 1686. Surapati proceeded to establish an independent domain in East Java, where he and his descendants ruled until the late 18th century when the polity was finally destroyed by company forces.10670
     Maroon communities mushroomed throughout the Dutch government of Ambon, in the mountainous and forested regions of Hitu, Leitimor, the Lease Islands, Seram, and elsewhere near Dutch settlements. Governor Robert Padbrugge (1683-87) even had sagu trees, which served as a safe haven for runaway slaves and criminals, under the walls of Castle Victoria cut down. Passage around the city of Kotah Ambon on Leitimor nevertheless remained unsafe. A mountain slope on the neighboring island of Hitu was the base of operation of a community of 30 runaway slaves in the 1690s; the runaways lived in three houses protected by caltrops, guns, bows, and arrows.10771
     Large groups of slaves ran away from the nutmeg gardens on Banda and harrassed the local perkeniers. In 1694, no less than 64 slaves recently sent from Batavia ran away. In 1702, a maroon community in the interior of Banda Neira was finally destroyed, its members dispersed, killed, or captured. The following year, adverse winds and currents foiled the spectacular act of "maritime maroonage" in the form of the escape of 23 slaves on board an indigenous vessel. Slave desertion, however, continued unabated to the exasperation of the Dutch.10872
     From the very beginnings of Dutch settlement on Ceylon, slaves fled, reportedly "for no reason" (sonder eenige redenen) from the Dutch-controlled coastal areas to the interior kingdom of Kandy. Dense forest cover and Dutch-Kandyan politico-economic rivalries provided a readily accessible safe haven to the fugitives, subsisting like other maroon communities elsewhere on "poaching, stealing, and vagabonding" (zich ernerende met stroopen, rooven en vagabonden).10973
     VOC authorities resorted to a wide variety of countermeasures in a desperate attempt to stem the continuous flood of slave escapees. A preferential slave import system promoted the introduction of certain "ethnicities" (often from remote areas having little cultural affinity with local indigenous populations), while prohibiting the trade in certain groups deemed troublesome (e.g., adult male Makassarese, Balinese, and others). Increasingly stern legislation held out the chilling prospect of cruel punishment to runaway slaves and their accomplices, including severe whipping, prolonged chain labor, and even the death penalty.110 Numerous treaties with indigenous rulers and headmen included clauses providing for the exchange of runaway slaves. Occasional general pardons were issued by various VOC authorities in order to incite fugitive slaves to return. Numerous armed expeditions, consisting of company soldiers, free burgher militia, and draftees from the local population (including Khoisan at the Cape and Alfurese "headhunters" in eastern Indonesia), were sent out, animated by the hope of material gain in the form of bounty or prize money. Sustained police action could have a temporary effect on maroonage. Despite occasional, fleeting successes, however, the problem of runaway slaves proved intractable. The myth of a relatively "benign" form of Indian Ocean slavery should therefore be quickly put to rest in the face of the continuous urge of slaves to escape their chattel status.74
  

Conclusion

 
Following the discovery of the seasonal monsoon regime sometime after 300 B.C.E., the societies and cultures of the Indian Ocean basin became integrated in a regional world-system. As the world's oldest trade, trafficking in captive labor involved, among other things, the migration of peoples, cultural diffusion, and economic exchange. Arriving in the Indian Ocean in the late sixteenth century, the Dutch took over and interacted with preexisting systems of slavery and dependency. Like its Indian Ocean predecessor, the Dutch Indian Ocean slave trade was urban-centered, drawing captive labor from three interlocking and overlapping circuits or subregions: "Greater South Africa," South Asia, and Southeast Asia. Dutch slavery discourse was rendered in religious humanitarian terms. Private and company slaves served as general laborers and were used in a wide variety of occupations in the Dutch settlements across the Indian Ocean basin. In certain of these slave societies, however, they also performed specific activities in accordance with the size of the individual slave household and the particular position the settlement occupied within the company's overall commercial network. The division of slave labor roughly followed ethnic, gender, and age lines based on colonial taxonomy and preexisting indigenous beliefs and practices that characterized local slave systems. The number of company and total Dutch slaves and the accompanying volume of the annual slave trades fluctuated greatly. In the late seventeenth century, there were about 4,000 company slaves and perhaps 60,000 total slaves. In order to replenish these numbers, 200-400 company slaves and 3,200-5,600 total slaves had to be imported each year. Assuming an average mortality rate en route of 20%, 240-480 company slaves and 4,476-7,716 total Dutch slaves had to be exported from their respective catchment areas. While slave revolt was rare, slave resistance assumed a variety of everyday forms of resistance, especially desertion or maroonage.75
     Recent Afrocentric archival research has cast new light on the world's oldest trade in the Indian Ocean basin, especially the east coast of Africa (after 1770) and the Dutch Cape Colony (1652-1796/1805). Effectively ending the protracted history of silence, the suffering of the Indian Ocean slaves is finally being noted by contemporary historians. Further Asian-centric research, however, is needed to map this previously uncharted territory in greater detail, in particular for the period before 1770 and for the areas east of the southwest Indian Ocean. A more comprehensive chronological and geographic coverage should pursue a post-civilizational narrative, an alternative historicized, holistic, analytical, dynamic, and multidimensional open model, sensitive to chronological and geographic variations, socioeconomic and political contexts, and cross-cultural interactions. This new paradigm will provide the analytical tools to properly study the "world of slaves" that integrated the entire Indian Ocean basin for several millennia.76


* This article has profited greatly from the numerous discussions by the participants of the International Conference on Slavery, Unfree Labour and Revolt in Asia and the Indian Ocean Region, University of Avignon, France, 4-6 October 2001. In particular, I would like to thank Richard Allen, Leonard Blussé, Richard Eaton, Hugo s'Jacob, Joseph Miller, John Wills Jr., and Nigel Worden for their useful suggestions and other contributions to earlier draft versions.


Notes

1 François Valentijn's Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indiën, S. Keijzer ed. (The Hague, 1856), volume II, p. 46.

2 Johannes Postma argues that the Dutch dominated the Atlantic slave trade during their control of northeast Brazil (1636-48) and their (in)direct acquisition of the asiento contract for Spanish America (1662-75 and 1686-89). See J. M. Postma, The Dutch in the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1600-1815 (New York, 1990), especially pp. 302-303. For the statement on the Dutch involvement in the Southeast Asian slave trade, see J. Fox, "'For Good and Sufficient Reasons': An Examination of Early Dutch East India Company Ordinances on Slaves and Slavery," in A. Reid ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency in Southeast Asia (New York, 1983), p. 247. Arasaratnam states that "there was a brisk slave trade in maritime Asia." See S. Arasaratnam, "Historical Foundations of the Economy of the Tamils of Northern Sri Lanka," in S. Arasaratnam, Ceylon and the Dutch, 1600-1800 (Aldershot, 1996), XIV, p. 18.

3 G. J. Knaap, "Slavery and the Dutch in Southeast Asia," in G. Oostindië, Fifty Years Later: Antislavery, Capitalism and Modernity in the Dutch Orbit (Pittsburgh, 1996), p. 193. The standard work on Dutch slavery in Southeast Asia in general is still Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency. For slavery in South Asia, see S. Arasaratnam, "Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean in the Seventeenth Century," in K. S. Mathew, ed., Mariners, Merchants and Oceans: Studies in Maritime History (New Delhi, 1995), pp. 195-208; A. K. Chattopadhyay, Slavery in the Bengal Presidency, 1772-1843 (London, 1977); K.K.N. Kurup, "Slavery in 18th Century Malabar," Revue historique de Pondichéry 11 (1973):56-60; U. Patnaik and M. Dingwaney, eds. Chains of Servitude: Bondage and Slavery in India (Madras, 1985); L. Caplan, "Power and Status in South Asian Slavery," in J. L. Watson, ed., Asian and African Systems of Slavery (Oxford, 1980), pp. 169-94. See also L. Hattingh, "Slawernij in die VOC-gebied," Kronos: Journal of Cape History 17 (1990): 3-18.

4 H. Gerbeau, "The Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean: Problems Facing the Historian and Research to be Undertaken," in The African Slave Trade from the Fifteenth to the Nineteenth Centuries (Paris, 1979), p. 184.

5 P. M. Larson, History and Memory in the Age of Enslavement: Becoming Merina in Highland Madagascar, 1770-1822 (Oxford, 2000); R. B. Allen, Slaves, Freedmen, and Indentured Laborers in Colonial Mauritius (Cambridge, 1999); D. Scarr, Slaving and Slavery in the Indian Ocean (London and New York, 1998); V. Teelock, Bitter Sugar: Sugar and Slavery in 19th Century Mauritius (Moka, 1998); S. Fuma, L'Esclavagisme à La Réunion, 1794-1848 (Paris and St. Denis, 1992); K. Noël, L'Esclavage à l'Isle de France (Ile Maurice) de 1715 à 1810 (Paris, 1991); J. V. Payet, Histoire de l'Esclavage à l'Ile Bourbon (Paris, 1990); W. G. Clarence-Smith ed., The Economics of the Indian Ocean Slave Trade in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1989); U. Bissoondayal and S.B.C. Servansing, eds., Slavery in the South West Indian Ocean (Moka, Mauritius, 1989); A. Sheriff, Slaves, Spices and Ivory in Zanzibar: Integration of an East African Commercial Empire into the World Economy, 1770-1873 (London, 1987); M.D.E. Nwulia, The History of Slavery in Mauritius and the Seychelles, 1810-1875 (London and Toronto, 1981); F. Cooper, Plantation Slavery on the East Coast of Africa (New Haven, 1977); R. W. Beachey, The Slave Trade of Eastern Africa (London, 1976); E. Alpers, Ivory and Slaves in East Central Africa: Changing Patterns of International Trade to the Later Nineteenth Century (London, 1975); J. M. Filliot, La Traite des Esclaves vers les Mascareignes au XVIIIe Siècle (Paris, 1974). The workshop titled "Slave Systems in Asia and the Indian Ocean: Their Structure and Change in the 19th and 20th Centuries," held at the University of Avignon, France, 18-20 May 2000, is illustrative of this modernist bias.

6 A. Kieskamp, "De Wereld in één Land: Slavernij in Zuid-Afrika (1653-1838)," in R. Daalder, A. Kieskamp, and D. Tang, eds., Slaven en Schepen: Enkele Reis, Bestemming Onbekend (Leiden, 2001), pp. 76-84; T. Keegan, Colonial South Africa and the Origins of the Racial Order (Cape Town, 1996); N. Worden, The Chains that Bind Us: A History of Slavery at the Cape (Kenwyn, 1996); C.-H. Shell, Children of Bondage: A Social History of the Slave Society at the Cape of Good Hope, 1652-1838 (Hanover, 1994); E. Eldredge and F. Morton eds., Slavery in South Africa: Captive Labor on the Dutch Frontier (Boulder, 1994); E. Eldredge, Slavery in Dutch South Africa (Cambridge, 1985); R. Ross, Cape of Torments: Slavery and Resistance in South Africa (London, 1983); A. J. Boëseken, Slaves and Free Blacks at the Cape, 1658-1700 (Cape Town, 1977); J. C. Armstrong and N. Worden, "The Slaves, 1652-1834," in R. Elphick and H. Giliomee eds., The Shaping of South African Society, 1652-1840, 2nd ed. (Middletown, Conn., 1988), pp. 109-83; M. F. Katzen, "White Settlers and the Origin of a New Society, 1652-1778" in M. Wilson and L. Thompson, eds., The Oxford History of South Africa, Vol. I (Oxford, 1969), pp. 187-232.

7 This issue is particularly controversial in South African historiography. For a good introduction to the debate, see N. Worden, "The Slave System of the Cape Colony and Its Aftermath," in G. Campbell ed., Slavery and Slave Systems in Asia and the Indian Ocean (London, forthcoming).

8 For an excellent survey of nineteenth-century indentured labor trades, see D.Northrup, Indentured Labor in the Age of Imperialism (New York, 1995). For the Cultivation System (1830-70), see R. E. Elson, Village Java under the Cultivation System, 1830-1870 (Sydney, 1994); C. Fasseur, The Politics of Colonial Exploitation: Java, the Dutch, and the Cultivation System (Ithaca, N.Y., 1992); R. E. Elson, Javanese Peasants and the Colonial Sugar Industry: Impact and Change in a East Javanese Residency (Kuala Lumpur, 1984). For the Liberal Period (after 1870), see V.J.H. Houben and Th. J. Lindblad, Coolie Labour in Colonial Indonesia: A Study of Labour Relations in the Outer Islands, c. 1900-1940 (Wiesbaden, 1999); A. L. Stoler, Capitalism and Confrontation in Sumatra's Plantation Belt, 1870-1979, 2nd ed. (Ann Arbor, 1995); J. Breman, Taming of the Coolie Beast: Plantation Society and the Colonial Order in Southeast Asia (New Delhi, 1989); K. Pelzer, Planter and Peasant: Colonial Policy and the Agrarian Struggle in East Sumatra, 1863-1947 (The Hague, 1978); K.-W. Thee, Plantation Agriculture and Export Growth: An Economic History of East Sumatra, 1863-1942 (Jakarta, 1977).

9 For Batavia, see B. Sirks, "Het Recht om Huysselyk te Castyden: Slavernij in Oost-Indië, 1602-1860," in Daalder, Kieskamp, and Tang, eds., Slaven en Schepen, pp. 85-91; H.E. Niemeijer, "Slavery, Ethnicity and the Economic Independence of Women in Seventeenth-Century Batavia," in B. Watson Andaya, Other Pasts: Women, Gender and History in Early Modern Southeast Asia (Honolulu, 2000), pp. 174-94; H. E. Niemeijer, Calvinisme en Koloniale Stadscultuur: Batavia, 1619-1725 (Almelo, 1996); P. H. van der Brug, Malaria en Malaise: De VOC in Batavia in de Achttiende Eeuw (Amsterdam, 1994); L. Blusse, Strange Company: Chinese Settlers, Mestizo Women and the Dutch in VOC Batavia (Dordrecht, 1988); S. Abeyasekere, Jakarta: A History (Singapore, 1989); J. Gelman Taylor, The Social World of Batavia (Madison, 1983). For Cape Town, see N. Worden, E. van Heyningen, and V. Bickford-Smith, Cape Town: The Making of a City (Hilversum, 1998). For Colombo, see R. Raben, "Batavia and Colombo: The Ethnic and Spatial Order of Two Colonial Cities 1600-1800," unpublished dissertation (Leiden, 1996). For Galle, see L. Wagenaar, Galle, VOC Vestiging in Ceylon: Beschrijving van een Koloniale Samenleving aan de Vooravond van de Singalese Opstand tegen het Nederlandse Gezag, 1760 (Amsterdam, 1994).

10 E. M. Jacobs, Koopman in Azië: De Handel van de Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie Tijdens de 18de Eeuw (Zutphen, 2000), p. 277 n. 6.

11 H. Gerbeau, "The Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean," p. 185.

12 David Brian Davis observed: "The more we learn about slavery, the more difficulty we have defining it," (Slavery and human progress, [New York, 1984]). For the Indian Ocean, see A. Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450-1680, Volume One: The Lands below the Winds (New Haven and London, 1988), p. 132; B. Stein, "Slavery and Serfdom in South Asia," in A.T. Embree, ed., Encyclopedia of Asian History (New York, 1988), III, p. 490; U. Chakaravarti, "Of Dasas and Karmakaras: Slave Labour in Ancient India," in U. Panaik and M. Dingawaney, eds., Chains of Servitude: Bondage and Slavery in India (Madras, 1985), pp. 35, 36-37, 48; T. Raychaudhuri and I. Habib, eds., The Cambridge Economic History of India, Volume I: c. 1200-1750 (New York, 1982), pp. 30-32, 92-93, 530; M. I. Finley, "Between Slavery and Freedom," Comparative Studies in Society and History 6 (1963-64), p. 23; J. L. Watson, "Slavery as an Institution: Open and Closed Systems," in J. L. Watson, ed., Asian and African Systems of Slavery (Oxford, 1980), pp. 12-13; A. Schottenhammer, "Slavery in Late Imperial China (17th/18th to early 20th century)," unpublished paper presented at the International Conference on Slavery, Unfree Labor and Revolt in Asia and the Indian Ocean Region, University of Avignon, 4-6 October 2001.

13 Classical statements include O. Patterson, Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study (Cambridge, Mass., 1982); M. I. Finley, "Slavery," International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 14 (New York, 1968), pp. 307-13; H. J. Nieboer, Slavery as an Industrial System: Ethnological Researches, 2nd ed. (The Hague, 1910); Watson, "Slavery as an Institution," pp. 3, 8; P. E. Lovejoy, Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa (New York, 1983), p. 1.

14 Watson, "Slavery as an Institution," pp. 9-13; A. Reid, "'Closed' and 'Open' Slave Systems in Pre-Colonial Southeast Asia," in A. Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependence in Southeast Asia, pp. 156-67. The Slavery Convention signed at Geneva in 1926 (approved by the United Nations by protocol in 1953) defines slavery as "the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised." The slave trade includes "all acts involved in the capture, acquisition or disposal of a person with intent to reduce him to slavery; all acts involved in the acquisition of a slave with a view to selling or exchanging him; all acts of disposal by sale or exchange of a slave acquired with a view to being sold or exchanged, and, in general, every act of trade or transport in slaves."

15 I would like to thank Joseph Miller, Michael Salman, and Richard B. Allen for bringing up this important issue.

16 See, for instance, K. McPherson, The Indian Ocean: A History of People and the Sea (New York, 1993); K. N. Chaudhuri, Asia before Europe: Economy and Civilization of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (New York, 1990); K. N. Chaudhuri, Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (New York, 1985); S. Chandra, ed., The Indian Ocean: Explorations, History, Commerce and Politics (New Delhi, 1987); A. Das Gupta and M. N. Pearson, eds., India and the Indian Ocean (Oxford, 1987); S. Arasaratnam, "Recent Trends in the Historiography of the Indian Ocean, 1500 to 1800," Journal of World History 1, no. 2 (Fall 1990):225-48. See also A.Wink, Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World (Leiden, 1990-present). These works are all deeply indebted to Braudel and the methodology of the Annales school, characterized by interdisciplinary or "total" history, geohistorical structuralism-a three-tiered conception of historical time (structures, conjonctures, and événements), and an emphasis on quantification or rigorous statistical analysis.

17 L. Shaffer, "Southernization," Journal of World History 5, no. 1 (Spring 1994):1, 4. For a critique, see J. O. Voll, "'Southernization' as a Construct in Post-Civilizational Narrative," in R. E. Dunn, The New World History: A Teacher's Companion (Boston and New York, 2000), pp. 193-95. See also J. H. Bentley, "Cross-Cultural Interaction and Periodization in World History," American Historical Review 101, no. 3 (June 1996): 749-70 and P. Manning, "The Problem of Interactions in World History," idem, pp. 771-82.

18 Chaudhuri, Trade and Civilisation, pp. 3-4, 10, 21; idem, Asia before Europe, pp. 104, 383-87; J. L. Abu-Lughod, Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250-1350 (New York, 1989), p. 261. See also McPherson, The Indian Ocean, pp. 3-5; Gupta and Pearson, eds., India and the Indian Ocean, pp. 11-20.

19 Though the emphasis here is on demographic and commercial aspects of slavery and slave trade, cultural diffusion was an important by-product of the movement of captive labor. For instance, in spite of legislation that encouraged the learning and use of Dutch, Portuguese (in the seventeenth century) and Malay (in the eighteenth century) became the lingua franca in many VOC settlements throughout the Indian Ocean (including Batavia) due to the presence of large numbers of slaves and freed slaves (Mardijkers) from India and Indonesia. Even Afrikaans, which developed in the Cape Colony in the eighteenth century, was a Portuguese creole language deeply influenced by Portuguese and Malay and the medium of conversation between master and servant. Similarly, while Christianity made some headway, Islam was introduced to the subject populations of various Dutch conquests by Indian and Indonesian slaves along with political exiles.

20 An example of a direct linkage is the Japan (Nagasaki)-Bengal connection: until 1685 large quantities of Japanese silver, gold, and copper were exchanged for (raw) silk and cotton textiles, sugar, and other commodities from Bengal. See O. Prakash, The Dutch East India Company and the Economy of Bengal, 1630-1720 (Princeton, 1985), pp. 118-41.

21 Based on Chaudhuri, Abu-Lughod distinguishes three "great cultural traditions" in the Indian Ocean, determined by the "monsoon imperatives" and centered on the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, and South China Sea, respectively. Abu-Lughod, Before European Hegemony, pp. 34-36, 253-59. See also Chaudhuri, Trade and Civilisation, pp. 103-105.

22 As Leonard Blussé observes: "[I]n the period from the establishment of the castle-city in 1619 to the so-called Chinese massacre in 1740, the city of Batavia was, economically speaking, basically a Chinese colonial town under Dutch protection.... Batavia castle with its warehouses functioned as the 'keystone' in the system of Dutch trading posts all over Asia, while Batavia town operated as a 'cornerstone' of the Chinese trade network in Southeast Asia." See Blussé, Strange Company, p. 74.

23 R. Raben, "Batavia and Colombo: The Ethnic and Spatial Order of Two Colonial Cities, 1600-1800," unpublished dissertation (Leiden, 1996), p. 121.

24 S. Subrahmanyam, "Slaves and Tyrants: Dutch Tribulations in Seventeenth-Century Mrauk-U," Journal of Early Modern History 1, no. 3 (August 1997):201-53; O. Prakash, European Commercial Enterprise in Pre-Colonial India, The New Cambridge History of India II:5 (New York, 1998), pp. 55, 144; O. Prakash, The Dutch East India Company and the Economy of Bengal, pp. 49-50; J. F. Richards, The Mughal Empire, The New Cambridge History of India I:5 (New York, 1993), p. 168; Raychaudhuri and Habib, eds., The Cambridge Economic History of India I, p. 335; V. B. Lieberman, Burmese Administrative Cycles: Anarchy and Conquest, c. 1580-1760 (Princeton, N.J., 1984); G. D. Winius, "The 'Shadow Empire' of Goa in the Bay of Bengal," Itinerario 7, no. 2 (1983):83-101; D.G.E. Hall, "Studies in Dutch relations with Arakan," Journal of the Burma Research Society 26, no. 1 (1936):1-31; D.G.E. Hall, "The Daghregister of Batavia and Dutch Trade with Burma in the Seventeenth Century," Journal of the Burma Research Society 29, no. 2 (1939):139-56; Arasaratnam, "Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean in the Seventeenth Century," pp. 195-99.

25 VOC 1479, OBP 1691, fls. 611r-627v, Specificatie van Allerhande Koopmansz. tot Tuticurin, Manaapar en Alvatt.rij Ingekocht, 1670/71-1689/90; W. Ph. Coolhaas and J.van Goor, eds., Generale Missiven van Gouverneurs-Generaal en Raden van Indië aan Heren Zeventien der Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie (The Hague, 1960-present), passim; T. Raychaudhuri, Jan Company in Coromandel, 1605-1690: A Study on the Interrelations of European Commerce and Traditional Economies (The Hague, 1962), pp. 166-67; S. Arasaratnam, "Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean in the Seventeenth Century," in K. S. Mathew, ed., Mariners, Merchants and Oceans: Studies in Maritime History (New Delhi, 1995), pp. 195-208.

26 For exports of Malabar slaves to Batavia, see Generale Missiven III, p. 433; VI, pp. 314, 450, 500, 520, 560, 630, 702, 789, 880. For exports of Malabar slaves to Ceylon, see Generale Missiven VI, pp. 312, 448; H.K. s'Jacob ed., De Nederlanders in Kerala, 1663-1701: De Memories en Instructies Betreffende het Commandement Malabar van de Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie, Rijks Geschiedkundige Publicatiën, Kleine serie 43 (The Hague, 1976), pp. xl-lxv, 77, 321, 346; R. Barendse, "Slaving on the Malagasy Coast, 1640-1700," in S. Evers and M. Spindler, eds., Cultures of Madagascar: Ebb and Flow of Influences (Leiden, 1995), p. 142. See also M. O. Koshy, The Dutch Power in Kerala (New Delhi, 1989); K. K. Kusuman, Slavery in Travancore (Trivandrum, 1973); M.A.P. Meilink-Roelofsz, De Vestiging der Nederlanders ter Kuste Malabar (The Hague, 1943), pp. 154-237; H. Terpstra, De Opkomst der Westerkwartieren van de Oostindische Compagnie (The Hague, 1918); E.M.E.P. Wolff, "Cochin: Een Mestiese Samenleving in India: Een Onderzoek Naar de Bevolking van een Vestiging van de Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie in de 18de Eeuw," unpublished M.A. thesis (Leiden, 1992), pp. 47-52.

27 M.P.M. Vink, "Encounters on the Opposite Coast: Cross-Cultural Contacts between the Dutch East India Company and the Nayaka State of Madurai in the Seventeenth Century," unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota (1998), pp. 165-69; Arasaratnam, Ceylon and the Dutch, 1600-1800 (Great Yarmouth, 1996), XI, p. 387; XIV, p. 19; H. D. Love, Vestiges from Old Madras (London, 1913), pp. 545-46.

28 J. Villiers, "Makassar: The Rise and Fall of an East Indonesian Maritime Trading State, 1512-1669," in J. Kathirithambi-Wells and J. Villiers, eds., The Southeast Asian Port and Polity: Rise and Demise (Singapore, 1990), pp. 143-59; Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce I, pp. 133-34, and 136; II, pp. 222, 224, 229-32, 278-80, 309, 320, 324; H. Sutherland, "Slavery and Slave Trade in South Sulawesi 1660s-1800s," in Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage, and Dependency, pp. 268-70; L. Y. Andaya, The Heritage of Arung Palakka: A History of South Sulawesi (Celebes) in the Seventeenth Century (The Hague, 1981); C. R. Boxer, Francisco Vieira de Figueiredo: A Portuguese Merchant in South East Asia, 1624-1667 (The Hague, 1967); F. W. Stapel, Het Bongaais Verdrag (Leiden, 1922).

29 VOC 1276, OBP 1671, fls. 684-1007, Notitie [Speelman] ... tot Naerrichtinge voor den Ondercoopman Jan van Opijnen, 17.2.1670; J. Noorduijn, "De Handelsrelaties van het Makassaarse Rijk Volgens de Notitie van Cornelis Speelman uit 1670," Nederlandse Historische Bronnen III (Amsterdam, 1983), pp. 96-123.

30 A. Reid, "Introduction; Slavery and Bondage in Southeast Asian History," in A. Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency, pp. 30-32; Dagh-Registers Gehouden int Casteel Batavia vant Passerende daer ter Plaetse als over Geheel Nederlandts-India. Anno 1653-1682 (Batavia and The Hague, 1887-1928); Raben, "Batavia and Colombo," pp. 122-125.

31 Boëseken, Slaves and Free Blacks at the Cape, p. 75; Shell, "Slavery at the Cape of Good Hope, 1680 to 1731," unpublished dissertation, Yale University (1986), pp. 352-53. Between 1652 and 1808 approximately 63,000 slaves (62,964) were imported to the Cape from four main areas: Africa 26.4%; Madagascar 25.1%; India 25.9%; Indonesia 22.7%. See Shell, Children of Bondage, pp. 40-41. Worden has revised Shell's estimate upward from 63,000 to 80,000. See N. Worden, "The Indian Ocean Origins of Cape Colony Slaves: A Preliminary Report," unpublished paper presented at the Workshop on Slave Systems in Asia and the Indian Ocean: Structure and Change in the 19th and 20th Centuries, Avignon, 18-20 May 2000. Based on Cape inventories and auction sales, Worden concludes that between 1697 and 1750 48% (673) of the sample of 1,401 slaves came from the Indian subcontinent (mostly Bengal and Malabar), 20.5% (288) from Southeast Asia (Bugi/Makassar, and to a lesser extent Bali, Ternate, Timor, and Ternate), and 9.9% (191) from Madagascar and other parts of Africa (including Rio de la Goa, Mozambique, Natal, and Angola), whereas 17.1% (239) were Cape-born.

32 H. Hägerdal, "From Batuparang to Ayudhya: Bali and the Outside World," Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië 154, no. 1 (1998):55-94; A. van der Kraan, "Bali: Slavery and the Slave Trade," in Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage, and Dependency, pp. 329-37; H. J. de Graaf, "Lombok in de 17de Eeuw," Djawa 21, no. 6 (November 1941):355-73; Reid, "Introduction," in: Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency, p. 30; H. J. Schulte Nordholt, The Spell of Power: A History of Balinese Politics, 1650-1940 (Leiden, 1996); H. J. Schulte Nordholt, Bali: Colonial Conceptions and Political Change, 1700-1940: From Shifting Hierarchies to 'Fixed Order' (Rotterdam, 1986); H. J. Schulte Nordholt, "Macht, Mensen en Middelen: Patronen en Dynamiek in de Balische Politiek, 1700-1840," M.A. thesis, VU Amsterdam (1980); R. Needham, Sumba and the Slave Trade, Monash University, Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Working Paper 31 (Clayton, 1983); C. Lekkerkerker, "De Baliërs van Batavia," De Indische Gids 40, no. 1 (1918):409-31; W.G.C. Bijvanck, "Onze Betrekkingen tot Lombok," De Gids 58, no. 4 (1894):134-57, 299-337; 59, no. 2 (1895):141-77.

33 N. van der Zwan, Madagascar: The Zebu as Guide through Past and Present (Berg en Dal, 1998), pp. 25-36; P. J. Moree, A Concise History of Dutch Mauritius, 1598-1710: A Fruitful and Healthy Land (London, 1998), pp. 27 et seq.; Barendse, "Slaving on the Malagasy coast," pp. 137-55; J. C. Armstrong, "Madagascar and the Slave Trade in the Seventeenth Century," Omaly sy Anio 7/8/9/10 (1983-84):211-33; G. de Nettancourt, "Le Peuplement Neerlandais à l'Ile Maurice (1598-1710)," in Mouvements de Populations dans l'Océan Indien (Paris, 1979), p. 224; N. Worden, "Slavery and Amnesia: Towards a Recovery of Malagasy Heritage in Presentations of Cape Slavery," in Rakoto, ed., L'Esclavage à Madagascar, p. 55; Shell, Children of Bondage, pp. 41-42; P. van Dam, Beschryvinge van de Oostindische Compagnie, F. W. Stapel, ed. (The Hague, 1929), Eerste Boek, Deel II, pp. 653-70; J. C. Armstrong and N. Worden, "The Slaves, 1652-1834," in R. Elphick and H. Giliomee, eds., The Shaping of South African Society, 1652-1840 (Middleton, Conn., 1989), pp. 111-14; D. Sleigh, Die Buiteposte: VOC-Buiteposte onder Kaapse Bestuur 1652-1795 (Pretoria, 1993); K. Heeringa, "De Nederlanders op Mauritius en Madagascar," Indische Gids 17 (1895):864-92, 1005-36. In total 33 company voyages (1654-1786) were dispatched for the benefit of the Cape and a few more for slaves at its Salida gold mines, carrying 2,820 to the Cape.

34 R. B. Allen, "The Mascarene Slave Trade and Labor Migration in the Indian Ocean during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries," in Campbell, ed., Slavery and Slave Systems (forthcoming).

35 Armstrong, "Madagascar and the Slave Trade in the Seventeenth Century," pp. 214-18; J. M. Filliot, La Traite des Esclaves vers les Mascareignes au XVIIIe Siècle (Paris, 1974), pp. 54-69; H. Gerbeau, "Histoire Oubliée, Histoire Occultée? La Diaspora Malgache à la Réunion: Entre Esclavage et Liberté," in Rakoto, ed., L'Esclavage à Madagascar, pp. 9-10. Allen argues that the number of slaves imported into the Mascarenes before 1810 was approximately 203,000, 12-27% higher than Filliot's estimate of 160,000 (5,000 for the period 1670-1728). See R. Allen, "The Mascarene Slave Trade," (forthcoming).

36 The number of healthy adult slaves at the mines increased from 150 (1677), 165 (1679), 225 (1680), and 325 (1682), to peak at 510 (1687) and 469 (1692). In 1687, there were also 90 sick adult slaves (impotenten) and 70 slave children. See Generale Missiven IV, pp. 222, 385, 426, 556; V, pp. 136, 180, 593, 758. See also Van Dam, Beschryvinge van de Oostindische Compagnie, Eerste Boek, Deel II, pp. 653-70; N. MacLeod, "De Oost-Indische Compagnie op Sumatra in de 17de Eeuw. IV: De Westkust van 1671 tot 1683," De Indische Gids 27, no. 1 (1905):125-42, 470-86; J. E. de Meijer, "De Goud- en Zilvermijnen ter Sumatra's Westkust," De Indische Gids 33, no. 1 (1911):28-67; D. Verbeek, Nota over de Verrichtingen der Oost-Indische Compagnie bij de Ontginning der Goud- en Zilveraders te Salida op Sumatra's Westkust (The Hague, 1910); S. P. L'Honoré Naber, ed., Reisebeschreibungen von Deutschen Beambten und Kriegsleuten im Dienst der Niederländischen West- und Ost-Indischen Kompagnien, 1602-1797, Volume 10: Elias Hesse, Gold-bergwerke in Sumatra, 1680-83 (The Hague, 1931).

37 Braudel, Civilization and Capitalism III, p. 30; Chaudhuri, Trade and Civilisation, p. 224. See also Abu-Lughod, Before European Hegemony, p. 13. For the theoretical ground work, see W. Cristaller, Central Places in Southern Germany (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966); A. Lösch, The Economics of Location (New Haven, Conn., 1954).

38 Philip D. Curtin, Cross-Cultural Trade in World History (New York, 1984), pp. 3-5, 8-9, 152-54.

39 During the company period, the commander (after 1690, governor) of the Cape also exercised jurisdiction over the company settlements of Mauritius (1638-58; 1664-1710), St. Helena Island (1673), and Rio de la Goa, Mozambique (1721-30).

40 Archief VOC, Overgekomen Brieven en Papieren; Generale Missiven, IV, pp. 138, 438, 554, 676-77; "Report of Governor Balthasar Bort on Malacca 1678," Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 5, no. 1 (August 1927):39-44; Tarling, ed., Cambridge History of Southeast Asia I, p. 371; s'Jacob, ed., De Nederlanders in Kerala, pp. lii, liv n. 189; s'Jacob, "De VOC en de Malabarkust in de 17de Eeuw," in M.A.P. Meilink-Roelofsz, ed., De VOC in Azië (Bussum, 1976), p. 88; R. J. Barendse, The Arabian Seas, 1640-1700 (Leiden, 1998), pp. 59, 70; G. J. Knaap, "A City of Migrants: Kota Ambon at the End of the Seventeenth Century," Indonesia 51 (April 1991):120, 124; G. J. Knaap, "Europeans, Mestizos and Slaves: The Population of Colombo at the End of the Seventeenth Century," Itinerario 5, no. 2 (1981):88; N. Worden, Cape Town: The Making of a City (Hilversum, 1998), p. 50.

41 As several historians have observed correctly, the distinction between "luxury" and "productive" slavery is often an artificial one; see Watson, "Slavery as an Institution, Open and Closed Systems," pp. 8, 14; Caplan, "Power and Status in South Asian Slavery," p. 190; Cooper, Plantation Slavery on the East Coast of Africa, p. 2. For different definitions of slave societies, see M. Finley, Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology (New York, 1983), pp. 80-81, 86; and C. Meillasoux, The Anthropology of Slavery: The Womb of Iron and Gold (Chicago, 1991), pp. 69-77.

42 ARA, Archief VOC, Overgekomen Brieven en Papieren; Generale Missiven, IV, pp. 138, 438, 554, 676-77; "Report of Governor Balthasar Bort on Malacca 1678," Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 5, no. 1 (August 1927):39-44; Tarling, ed., Cambridge History of Southeast Asia I, p. 371; s'Jacob ed., De Nederlanders in Kerala, pp. lii, liv n. 189; s'Jacob, ed., "De VOC en de Malabarkust in de 17de Eeuw," in M.A.P. Meilink-Roelofsz, ed., De VOC in Azië (Bussum, 1976), p. 88; R. J. Barendse, The Arabian Seas, 1640-1700 (Leiden, 1998), pp. 59, 70; G. J. Knaap, "A City of Migrants: Kota Ambon at the End of the Seventeenth Century," Indonesia 51 (April 1991), pp. 120, 124; G. J. Knaap, "Europeans, Mestizos and Slaves: The Population of Colombo at the End of the Seventeenth Century," Itinerario 5, no. 2 (1981):88; N. Worden, Cape Town: The Making of a City (Hilversum, 1998), p. 50.

43 Ph. D. Curtin, The Tropical Atlantic in the Age of the Slave Trade (Washington, 1991), pp. 2-3, 6.

44 For the problematic nature of the term "slave" in an Indian Ocean context, see note 12. Though the term "slave" is used in the text, relations of dependency and inequality normally ran across a continuum from freedom to slavery with permeable boundaries between various categories or population groups.

45 The Laws of Manu, Vol. 8, G. Buhler, trans., The Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 25 (Oxford, 1886), p. 415; The Minor Law-Books, Part I: Narada, Vol. V, J. Jolly, ed., The sacred books of the East, Vol. 33 (Oxford, 1889), pp. 26-28, 29, 31-36; B. Stein, A History of India (Malden, Mass., 1998), pp. 216-20; U. Chakravarti, "Of Dasas and Karmakaras: Servile Labour in Ancient India," in U. Patnaik and M. Dingawaney, eds., Chains of Servitude: Bondage and Slavery in India (New York, 1985), pp. 40-42, 51-54.

46 B. Lewis, Race and Slavery in the Middle East: An Historical Inquiry (Oxford and New York, 1990), pp. 3-15; R. Brunschvig, s.v., "Abd" in Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd ed., vol. I (Leiden, 1986), pp. 24-40; M. Gordon, Slavery in the Arab World (New York, 1989), pp. 18-47; H. Müller, "Sklaven," in Handbuch der Orientalistik, B. Spuler ed., Part 1, Der Nahe und der Mittlere Osten, Vol. 6, Geschichte der Islamischen Länder, Sec. 6, Wirtschaftsgeschichte des Vorderen Orients in Islamischer Zeit, Part 1 (Leiden and Cologne, 1977), pp. 54-83. For the Jambi apologia, see W. Ph. Coolhaas, J. van Goor, and J. E. Schooneveld-Oosterling, eds., Generale Missiven van Gouverneurs-Generaal en Raden aan Heren Zeventien der Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie (The Hague, 1960-present), III, p. 710.

47 Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce I, pp. 129-46; Reid, "'Closed' and 'Open' Systems in Pre-Colonial Southeast Asia," pp. 158-59, 169-71. For specific Southeast Asian legal codes, see M. C. Hoadley and M. B. Hooker, An Introduction to Javanese Law: A Translation of and Commentary on the Agama (Tucson, 1981); Y. F. Liaw, ed., Undang-Undang Melaka: The Laws of Melaka (The Hague, 1976); I. Takeshi, "The World of the Adat Aceh: A Historical Study of the Sultanate of Aceh," unpublished dissertation, ANU (Canberra, 1984).

48 The following discussion is largely based on M.P.M. Vink, "Suffering in Silence: Dutch Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean in the Seventeenth Century," unpublished paper presented at the World History Association, Ninth Annual International Conference, Boston, 22-25 June 2000.

49 G. Groenhuis, "Zonen van Cham," Kleio 21 (1980):224; G. J. Schutte, "Bij het Schemerlicht van Hun Tijd: Zeventiende-Eeuwse Gereformeerden en de Slavenhandel," in M. Bruggeman et al., eds., Mensen van de Nieuwe Tijd: Een Liber Amoricum voor A. Th. Van Deursen (Amsterdam, 1996), pp. 193-217; P. C. Emmer, De Nederlandse Slavenhandel, 1500-1850 (Amsterdam and Antwerp, 2000), pp. 30-39; L. R. Priester, De Nederlandse Houding ten Aanzien van de Slavenhandel en Slavernij, 1596-1863: Het Gedrag van de Slavenhandelaren van de Commercie Compagnie van Middelburg in de 18de Eeuw (Middelburg, 1987), pp. 43, 74 n. 28. See also S. R. Haynes, Noah's Curse: The Biblical Justification of American Slavery (New York, 2001); B. Braude, "The Sons of Noah and the Construction of Ethnic and Geographical Identities in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods," William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 54 (January 1997):103-42; W. McKee Evans, "From the Land of Canaan to the Land of Guinea or the Strange Odyssey of the Sons of Ham," American Historical Review 85, no. 1 (February 1980):15-43; M. Adhikari, "The Sons of Ham: Slavery and the Making of Coloured Identity," South African Historical Journal 27 (1992):95-112. For an interesting discussion of the "Ham ideology," see Valentijn, Oud- en Nieuw Oost-Indiën II, pp. 371-72.

50 H. Grotius, The Law of War and Peace: De Jure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres, F. Kelsey, trans., J. Brown Scott, ed. (Indianapolis and New York, 1925), pp. 255-59, 690-91, 718, 761-69.

51 Vink, "Suffering in Silence."

52 VOC 1232, OBP 1661, fl. 383, Miss. Gouvr. Pit en Raad van Coromandel aan H. XVII, 9.8.1660; VOC 884, BUB 1660, fl. 1703, Miss. Gouvr. Genl. en Raad aan Comms. Van Goens te Colombo, 4.11.1660. The purchase of slaves in exchange for rice earned the Dutch the condemnation of local members of the Society of Jesus (an active participant in the Indian Ocean slave trade itself). See J. Bertrand, La Mission du Maduré d'après des documents inédits III. Paris 1848, pp. 124-25. For Jesuit and Portuguese apologies of the slave trade, see J. Correia-Affonso, The Jesuits in India, 1542-1773: A Short History (Anand, 1997), pp. 114-18; A.J.R. Russell-Wood, "Iberian Expansion and the Issue of Black Slavery: Changing Portuguese Attitudes, 1440-1770," American Historical Review 83, no. 1 (February 1978):16-42.

53 For instance, L. Hovy, Ceylonees Plakkaatboek: Plakkaten en Andere Wetten Uitgevaardigd Door het Nederlands Bestuur op Ceylon, 1638-1796, 2 vols. (Hilversum, 1996), I, pp. 20, 62, 97-98, 293. The fact that the ordinance had to be reissued several times indicates the ineffectiveness of the prohibition.

54 V. Matheson and M. B. Hooker, "Slavery in the Malay Texts: Categories of Dependency and Compensation," in Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependency, pp. 185, 192-93, 198, 203, 205; Reid, "'Closed' and 'Open' Slave Systems in Pre-Colonial Southeast Asia," in idem, pp. 169-70; K. Endicott, "The Effects of Slave Raiding on the Aborigines of the Malay Peninsula," in idem, pp. 216-18; D. J. Steinberg, ed., In Search of Southeast Asia: A Modern History, 2nd ed. (Honolulu, 1987), pp. 15-16.

55 Heeres, ed., Corpus Diplomaticum Neerlando-Indicum II, pp. 500, 678-79, 749-50; III, pp. 320, 384, 490, 529, 602, 605, 620, 845-46, 850, 881.

56 Shell, Children of Bondage, pp. 46-48; Hovy, Ceylonees Plakkaatboek I, pp. 309-10, 395; De Haan, Oud Batavia I, p. 456.

57 VOC 1434, OBP 1688, fls. 263v-265v, Samentrekking Huijsgezinnen Cochin ..., 17.12.1687; Generale Missiven IV, p. 554; idem V, pp. 202, 203-204; Shell, Children of Bondage, p. 445.

58 Ibid.

59 K. Ward, "The Bounds of Bondage: Forced Migration between the Netherlands East Indies and the Cape of Good Hope in the Eighteenth Century," Ph.D. dissertation (Michigan, forthcoming). Nigel Worden is currently working on company convicts and exiles sent to the Cape.

60 J. A. van der Chijs, ed., Nederlandsch-Indisch Placaatboek, 1602-1811, 17 vols. (Batavia and The Hague, 1885-1900); K. M. Jeffreys and S. D. Naudé, eds., Kaapsch Plakkaatboek, 1651-1806, 6 vols. (Cape Town, 1944-51); A. J. Boëseken, ed., Resolusies van die Politieke Raad 1651-1715, 3 vols. (Cape Town, 1957-62); Hovy, Ceylonees Plakkaatboek, 2 vols. For a compendium or brief summary of ordinances issued at Ambon in the seventeenth century, see Valentijn, Oud- en Nieuw Oost-Indiën II, pp. 652-60.

61 In 1684, there were 6 convicts in Ambon, whereas Banda housed 21. In 1710, Ceylon had 174 resident "bandits." Generale Missiven VI, pp. 653, 694; Van Dam, Beschryvinge I, pp. 134, 200.

62 J. Wisseman Christie, "State Formation in Early Maritime Southeast Asia: A Consideration of the Theories and the Data," Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië 151, no. 2 (1995):249-50, 270-71, 276-78; B. Bronson, "Exchange at the Upstream and Downstream Ends: Notes toward a Functional Model of the Coastal State in Southeast Asia," in K. L. Hutterer, ed., Economic Exchange and Social Interaction in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from Prehistory, History and Ethnography (Ann Arbor, 1977), pp. 39-52.

63 B. Watson-Andaya and L. Y. Andaya, A History of Malaysia, 2nd ed. (Honolulu, 2001), pp. 3-4, 129, 163-64; L. Y. Andaya, The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period (Honolulu, 1993), pp. 192, 196, 210; B. Watson-Andaya, To Live as Brothers: Southeast Sumatra in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Honolulu, 1993), pp. 13-20, 95-97, 100, 103, 222, 225; L. Andaya, "Local Trade Networks in Maluku in the 16th, 17th, and 18th Centuries," Cekalele 2, no. 2 (1991), pp. 73-74, 88; T. Bigalke, "Dynamics of the Torajan Slave Trade in South Sulawesi," in Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage, and Dependency, p. 343; R. Laarhoven, "Lords of the Great River: The Magindanao Port and Polity during the Seventeenth Century," in Kathirithambi-Wells and Villiers, eds., The Southeast Asian Port and Polity, pp. 163-64, 169, 172-73; N. Tarling, ed., The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Volume I: From Early Times to c. 1800 (New York, 1992), pp. 407, 439, 480-81, 520, 560; Knaap, Kruidnagelen en Christenen, pp. 114-15.

64 J. C. Heestermann, "Warrior, Peasant and Brahmin," Modern Asian Studies 29, no. 3 (1995):637-54; J. C. Heestermann, "The Hindu Frontier," Itinerario 13, no. 1 (1989):1-16; J. C. Heestermann, "Littoral et Interieur de l'Inde," in L. Blussé, H. L. Wesseling, and G.D. Winius, eds., History and Underdevelopment: Essays on Underdevelopment and European Expansion in Asia and Africa (Leiden, 1980), pp. 87-92. See also J. Gommans, "The Silent Frontier of South Asia, c. A.D. 1100-1800," Journal of World History 9, no. 1 (Spring 1998):1-23; B. Stein, A History of India (Malden, Mass., 1998), pp. 115, 280-81.

65 In 1562, Akbar abolished the practice of enslaving prisoners of war, no longer even forcibly converting them to Islam. In the following two years, he also did away with the pilgrim tax and remitted the hated jizya or non-Muslim poll tax. All these measures were reversed by Aurangzeb.

66 Van der Zwan, Madagascar, pp. 26-37; Armstrong, "Madagascar and the Slave Trade," pp. 213-16; Barendse, "Slaving on the Malagasy Coast," pp. 149-50; I. Rakato, "Etre Ou ne pas être: L'Andevo Esclave, un Sujet de Non-Droit," in I. Rakato, ed., L'Esclavage à Madagascar: Aspects Historiques et Résurgences Contemporaines (Antanarivo, 1997); P. M. Larson, "A Census of Slaves Exported from Central Madagascar between 1775 and 1820," in idem, pp. 131-46; S. Evers, "Stigmatization as a Self-Perpetuating Process," in Evers and Spindler, eds., Cultures of Madagascar, pp. 158, 166-67; M. Bloch, "Modes of Production and Slavery in Madagascar: Two Case Studies," in Watson, ed., Asian and African Systems of Slavery, pp. 104-107.

67 S. Subrahmanyam, The Portuguese Empire in Asia, 1500-1700: A Political and Economic History (New York, 1993), pp. 196-200; A. Isaacman, Mozambique-The Africanization of a European Institution: The Zambezi Prazos, 1750-1902 (Madison and Milwaukee, 1972); Lovejoy, Transformations in Slavery, pp. 128-35, 220-30; Manning, Slavery and African Life, pp. 52-54; Cooper, Plantation Slavery, pp. 38-46; Sherriff, Slaves, Spices and Ivory, pp. 33-76; Beachey, Slave Trade of Eastern Africa; Alpers, Ivory and Slaves.

68 S. Newton-King, Masters and Servants on the Cape Eastern Frontier, 1760-1803 (Cambridge, 1999); E. Boonzaier, C. Malherbe, et al., The Cape Herders: A History of the Khoikhoi of South Africa (Cape Town, 1996); C. Malherbe, "Indentured and Free Labour in South Africa: Towards an Understanding," South African Historical Journal 24 (1991):15; H. Giliomee, "Processes in the Development of the Southern African Frontier," in H. Lamar and L. Thompson, eds., The Frontier in History: North America and Southern Africa Compared (New Haven and London, 1981), p. 85; Shell, Children of Bondage, p. 136; Worden, The Chains that Bind Us, pp. 44-45, 49; and Elphick and Giliomee, eds., The Shaping of South African Society, pp. 3-65, 134-39, 185, 299-301.

69 For problems with Mughal authorities, see Generale Missiven II, pp. 624, 718, 791; III, pp. 32, 132, 497; IV, p. 352; Arasaratnam, "Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean," pp. 195-99; Arasaratnam, Merchants, Companies, and Trade, pp. 104-105, 210-11. For problems with the Marathas, see Generale Missiven IV, p. 291; Van Dam, Beschryvinge, II, ii, p. 114; Heeres, ed., Corpus Diplomaticum Neerlando-Indicum III, pp. 65, 125; Arasaratnam, "Slave Trade in the Indian Ocean," pp. 195-99; Arasaratnam, Merchants, Companies, and Trade, pp. 104-105, 210-11. For objections from the Nayaka rulers, see VOC 1151, OBP 1645, fl. 764r, Miss. Gouvr. Gardenijs van Coromandel aan Batavia, 3.4.1643; VOC 1324, OBP 1677, fl. 12r, Miss. Gouvr. van Goens de Jonge en Raad van Ceijlon aan Batavia, 5.3.1677. See also Generale Missiven I, pp. 185-86, 196, 199, 201. For Mataram and Makassar, see Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, I, p. 133.

70 For Southeast Asia, see Reid, "Introduction," in Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependence, pp. 8-19; Reid, "'Closed' and 'Open' Slave Systems in Pre-Colonial Southeast Asia," in Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage and Dependence, pp. 156-77; Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, pp. 120-21, 129-36. For South and East Asia, see J. N. Sarkar, Mughal Economy: Organization and Working (Calcutta, 1987), pp. 250-53; Chaudhuri and Habib, The Cambridge Economic History of India, pp. 30-31, 92-93, 503; Watson, "Slavery as an Institution," pp. 9-13; Caplan, "Power and Status in South Asian Slavery," pp. 169-94; J. Watson, "Transactions in People: The Chinese Market in Slaves, Servants, and Heirs," in idem, pp. 223-50.

71 De Haan, Oud Batavia I, pp. 458-60. For a good example, see Valentijn, Oud- en Nieuw Oost-Indiën II, pp. 369-70.

72 Generale Missiven IV, pp. 97, 234, 467-68, 644; De Haan, Oud Batavia I, pp. 446-47; Jacobs, Koopman in Azië, p. 177; Sirks, "Het Recht om Huysselyk te Castyden," pp. 85-87. There were 170 sugar mills in the Ommelanden around Batavia in 1710.

73 Generale Missiven V, pp. 582, 674-76, 714-15; Van Dam, Beschryvinge II, I, p. 199; Hanna, Indonesian Banda, pp. 79-80, 85; Van Goor, De Nederlandse Koloniën, p. 113; Jacobs, Koopman in Azië, p. 24.

74 VOC 1240, OBP 1663, fl. 1438r, Memorie Gouvr. Thijssen van Malacca aan Van Riebeeck, 1.11.1662; "Report of Governor Bort on Malacca," pp. 93-94.

75 VOC 1234, OBP 1662, fl. 125v, Miss. Comms. Van Goens te Colombo aan Batavia, 5.4.1661; Instructions from the Governor-General and Council of India to the Governor of Ceylon, 1656-1665, S. Pieters, trans. (Colombo, 1908), pp. 3, 4, 18-19, 27, 70-71, 96-98; Hovy, Ceylonees Plakkaatboek I, pp. 68-72, 77, 129-30; Arasaratnam, Dutch Power in Ceylon, p. 131; Knaap, "Europeans, Mestizos and Slaves," p. 94.

76 Generale Missiven V, pp. 675, 714-15; Van Dam, Beschryvinge van de Oostindische Compagnie, Tweede Boek, Deel I, p. 199; Jacobs, Koopman in Azië, p. 177; VOC 1234, OBP 1662, fl. 125v. Miss. Comms. Van Goens te Colombo aan Batavia, 5.4.1661; Shell, Children of Bondage, p. 136; Worden, The Chains that Bind Us, pp. 44-45, 49; Elphick and Giliomee, eds., The Shaping of South African Society, pp. 134-39, 185, 299-301.

77 Niemeijer, "Slavery, Ethnicity, and the Economic Independence of Women," pp. 174-78, 194. For an example of the hierarchical typology of "national characters," see Valentijn, Oud- en Nieuw Oost-Indiën II, p. 370.

78 B. Watson Andaya, "Introduction," in Andaya, ed., Other Pasts, p. 25; Niemeijer, "Slavery, Ethnicity, and the Economic Independence of Women," pp. 159-60.

79 Caplan, "Power and Status in South Asian Slavery," pp. 170, 173, 182, 189; Reid, "Introduction," pp. 14-17; Knaap, "Slavery and the Dutch in Southeast Asia," p. 197; Allen, "The Mascarene Slave Trade and Labor Migration in the Indian Ocean," pp. 21-22; Shell, Children of Bondage, pp. 49-54.

80 In 1768/69, mortality rates among company servants were highest in Southeast Asia (Batavia, 33%; Java's north coast, 27%; Bantam, 19%; Banda, 16%), medium at the Cape (17%), and lowest in South Asia (Bengal, 8%; Malabar, 5%; Coromandel, 4%; Ceylon, 4%). Van der Brug, Malaria en Malaise, p. 29. Mortality rates among slaves differed of course from those among Europeans due to different working and living conditions. Allen assumes an average net slave mortality in eighteenth-century French Madagascar and Réunion somewhere between 1.74 and 2.54%. Allen, "The Mascarene Slave Trade and Labor Migration in the Indian Ocean."

81 Knaap, Kruidnagelen en Christenen, pp. 100-22; Van Dam, Beschryvinge van de Oostindische Compagnie, Tweede Boek, Deel I, pp. 132 et seq.

82 Generale Missiven IV, p. 242; idem VI, p. 190; Hanna, Indonesian Banda, p. 85; Van Dam, Beschryvinge van de Oostindische Compagnie, pp. 177, 200-201.

83 VOC 1236, OBP 1662, Miss. Gouvr. Laurens Pit en raad van Coromandel aan Batavia, 11.2.1661; VOC 1234, OBP 1662, Miss. Comms. Van Goens te Colombo aan Batavia, 5.4.1661; Generale Missiven, III, p. 716. See also S. Arasaratnam, Dutch Power in Ceylon, 1658-1687 (Amsterdam, 1958), pp. 132-34; Van Dam, Beschryvinge, p. 298; VOC 1292, OBP 1674, Miss Gouvr Van Goens de Jonge en raad van Ceijlon, 29.5.1673. In 1709, 300 slaves perished within 6 months allegedly due to overconsumption of alcohol. See Generale Missiven, VI, p. 622.

84 Generale Missiven V, pp. 252, 382; De Haan, Oud Batavia I, pp. 453-54. Mortality rates among newly arrived company servants before and after 1733 grew from 5-10% to 40-50%. Natural and human-induced changes included the deforestation of the Ommelanden and subsequent increased sedimentation after 1659, a volcanic eruption in 1699, and the digging of the Mookervaart in 1733. Van der Brug, Malaria en Malaise, pp. 39 et seq.; Blusse, Strange Company, passim.

85 For the debate among the dompany directors surrounding these measures, see F. S. Gaastra, Bewind en Beleid bij de VOC: De Financiële en Commerciële Politiek van de Bewindhebbers, 1672-1702 (Zutphen, 1989); Niemeijer, Calvinisme en Koloniale Stadscultuur, p. 47.

86 VOC 1333, OBP 1679, fl. 12r, Miss. Gouvr. Van Goens de Jonge en raad van Ceijlon aan Batavia, 30.4.1678; VOC 1343, OBP 1680, fl. 19r, Miss. Gouvr. Van Goens de Jonge en raad van Ceijlon aan Batavia, 3.3.1679; Generale Missiven IV, pp. 164, 226, 294, 354, 367, 370; Van Dam, Beschryvinge pp. 297, 344-50; Memoir Left by Rycklof van Goens, Jun. Governor of Ceylon, 1675-1679, to his Successor, Laurens Pyl, Late Commandeur, Jaffnapatnam, S. Pieters, trans. (Colombo, 1910), pp. 5-6, 11.

87 R. Austen, "The Trans-Saharan Trade: A Tentative Census," in H. A. Gemery and J. S. Hogendorn, eds., The Uncommon Market: Essays in the Economic History of the Atlantic Slave Trade (New York, 1979), pp. 23-76; R. Austen, "From the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean: European Abolition, the African Slave Trade, and Asian Economic Structures," in D. Eltis and J. Walvin, eds., The Abolition of the Slave Trade: Origins and Effects in Europe, Africa, and the Americas (Madison, 1981), pp. 117-39.

88 Of 2,467 slaves traded on 12 slave voyages from Batavia, India, and Madagascar between 1677 and 1701 to the Cape, 1,617 were landed-a loss of 850 slaves, or 34.45%. On 19 voyages between 1677 and 1732, the mortality rate was somewhat lower (22.7%). See Shell, "Slavery at the Cape of Good Hope, 1680-1731," p. 332. Filliot estimated the average mortality rate among slaves shipped from India and West Africa to the Mascarene Islands at 20-25% and 25-30%, respectively. Average mortality rates among slaves arriving from closer catchment areas were lower: 12% from Madagascar and 21% from East Africa. See Filliot, La Traite des Esclaves, p. 228; A. Toussaint, La Route des Îles: Contribution à l'Histoire Maritime des Mascareignes (Paris, 1967), pp. 451, 454; Allen, "The Madagascar Slave Trade and Labor Migration."

89 Austen, "The Trans-Saharan Trade: A Tentative Census," pp. 66, 68; Austen, "From the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean," p. 136; Lovejoy, Transformations in Slavery, p. 47; Postma, The Dutch in the Atlantic Slave Trade, pp. 294-95, 303. For information regarding the numbers of slaves brought through the Crimea, see H. Inalcik, Sources and Studies on the Ottoman Black Sea. Vol. I: The Customs Registers of Caffa, 1487-1490 (Cambridge, Mass., 1996); A.Fisher, "Muscovy and the Black Sea Slave Trade," Canadian-American Slavic Studies 6, no. 4 (1972):575-94, reprinted in A. Fisher, A Precarious Balance: Conflict, Trade, and Diplomacy on the Russian-Ottoman Frontier (Istanbul, 1999).

90 J. C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Resistance (New Haven, 1985).

91 E. D. Genovese, From Rebellion to Revolution: Afro-American Slave Revolts in the Making of the Modern World (Baton Rouge, 1979), pp. 11-12. See also M. Craton, Testing the Chains: Resistance to Slavery in the British West Indies (Ithaca and London, 1982).

92 De Haan, Oud Batavia I, p. 452; Generale Missiven IV, pp. 676-77; Worden, The Chains that Bind Us, p. 60. On the other hand, the absence of social and physical distancing between master and slave could also provoke conflict.

93 De Haan, Oud Batavia I, pp. 129, 363-64.

94 The typical Caribbean sugar plantation had a force of at least 50 slaves-more often, more than 200 or even 300. See Curtin, The Tropical Atlantic, pp. 3, 7.

95 Van Dam, Beschryvinge I, p. 199; Valentijn, Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indiën III, pp. 5-12, 22-23; Worden, The Chains that Bind Us, p. 48; Armstrong and Worden, "The Slaves," pp.135-36; Biewinga, De Kaap de Goede Hoop, pp. 91-92; Shell, "Slavery at the Cape of Good Hope," pp. 486, 491; Kieskamp, "De wereld in één land," pp. 81-82. There were some nutmeg gardens and wine farms with more than 100 slaves, though they were clearly the exception. In 1805, the largest single number of slaves in an European household in Batavia was 165. Sirks, "Het Recht om Huysselyk te Castyden," p. 88.

96 G. Schutte, "Company and Colonists at the Cape, 1652-1795," in Elphick and Giliomee, eds., The Shaping of South African Society, pp. 303-15; Katzen, "White Settlers and the Origins of a New Society," pp. 187-232; F. C. Dominicus, Het Ontslag van Wilhem Adriaen van der Stel (Rotterdam 1928); C. Beyers, Die Kaapse Patriotte Gedurende die Laatste Kwart van die Agtiende eeu en die Voortlewing van Hul Denkbeelde (Pretoria, 1967).

97 N.P. van den Berg, Uit de Dagen der Compagnie: Geschiedkundige Schetsen (Amsterdam, 1904), pp. 30-63; Blusse, Strange Company, pp. 24-25; De Haan, Oud-Batavia I, pp. 112-14, 376-77; II, pp. 8-9.

98 De Haan, Oud Batavia I, p. 452.

99 Generale Missiven V, pp. 371, 423, 426, 490; H. J. de Graaf, De Geschiedenis van Ambon en de Zuid-Molukken (Franeker, 1977), pp. 157-63; F. de Haan, Priangan: De Preanger-Regentschappen onder het Nederlandsch Bestuur tot 1811 (Batavia, 1910), I, pp. 228-31; J.K.J. de Jonge and M. L. van Deventer, eds., De Opkomst van het Nederlandsch Gezag in Oost-Indiën, 16 vols. (The Hague, 1862-1909), VIII, pp. 58-59, 62-63, 65-67; Ricklefs, War, Culture and Economy in Java, pp. 105-106.

100 Blussé, Strange Company, pp. 88-96; A.R.T. Kemasang, "How Dutch Colonialism Foreclosed a Domestic Bourgeoisie in Java: The 1740 Chinese Massacres Reappraised," Review 9, no. 1 (1985):57-80; J. Th. Vermeulen, De Chineezen te Batavia en de Troebelen van 1740 (Leiden, 1938); De Haan, Oud Batavia I, pp. 381-82; De Jonge et al., De Opkomst van het Nederlandsch Gezag IX, pp. xlvii-lxxvi; W. R. van Hoëvell, "Batavia in 1740," Tijdschrift voor Neêrland's Indië 3 (1840):447-557; J. Crawfurd, History of the Indian Archipelago (London, 1820), II, pp. 427-30; T. S. Raffles, The History of Java (London, 1817), II, pp. 210-14.

101 Generale Missiven VI, pp. 668, 732, 846.

102 Ross, Cape of Torments, pp. 96-118; K. Harris, "The Slave 'Rebellion' of 1808," Kleio (Pretoria) 20 (1988):54-65; Worden, Slavery in Dutch South Africa, pp. 120, 134; Armstrong and Worden, "The Slaves, 1652-1834," p. 161. See also the historical novel on the Bokkeveld uprising: A. Brink, Chain of Voices (London, 1982).

103 For Ambon, see Generale Missiven V, pp. 26, 200, 298, 441, 512, 671, 822; VI, 18, 161, 601, 665, 844; G. E. Rumphius, De Ambonse Historie (The Hague, 1910), pp. 50, 71; Valentijn, Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indiën II, pp. 62-63, 229, 231, 308, 313, 341-42, 368-69, 466, 474-76, 562, 565, 592, 610, 616, 622, 633, 636, 642-43, 647, 652, 656-61, 663, 666, 672; Knaap, Kruidnagelen en Christenen, p. 134. For Banda, see Generale Missiven, IV, pp. 713-15; VI, pp. 190, 238, 479, 668, 732, 754, 846; Valentijn, Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indiën III, pp. 15, 88; Jacobs, Koopman in Azië, p. 26. For Batavia, see Generale Missiven IV, pp. 749, 777, 834; V, pp. 426, 490, 647; VI, pp. 102, 801-802, 827, 829, 841; Niemeijer, Calvinisme en Koloniale Stadscultuur, pp. 46, 266, 268, 269; De Haan, Oud Batavia I, pp. 461-66; Abeyasekere, Jakarta, pp. 22-23; Sirks, "Het Recht om Huysselyk te Castyden," pp. 88-90. For the Cape, see N. Worden, "Revolt in Cape Colony Slave Society," unpublished paper presented at the International Conference on Slavery, Unfree Labour and Revolt in Asia and the Indian Ocean Region, University of Avignon, 4-6 October 2001; Ross, Cape of Torments, passim; Worden, Slavery in Dutch South Africa, pp. 119-37; Armstrong and Worden, "The Slaves, 1652-1834," pp. 157-62; Worden, The Chains that Bind Us, pp. 64-67; Biewinga, De Kaap de Goede Hoop, pp. 110-15. For Ceylon, see Generale Missiven VI, p. 623; Van Dam, Beschryvinge, p. 331; Hovy, Ceylonees Plakkaatboek I, pp. 20, 62-63, 97-98, 109, 169-70, 191, 201, 234, 290, 293, 309-10.

104 For the prevalence of escape in slave societies throughout the Indian Ocean region, see N. Alpers, "Flight to Freedom: Escape from Slavery among Bonded Africans in the Indian Ocean World, c. 1750-1962," unpublished paper presented at the Workshop on Slave Systems in Asian and the Indian Ocean, University of Avignon, May 2000.

105 Moree, A Concise History of Dutch Mauritius, p. 31; Ross, Cape of Torments, pp. 54-72; Armstrong and Worden, "The Slaves, 1652-1834," pp. 157-60; Worden, Slavery in Dutch South Africa, pp. 123-28; Kaapsch Plakkaatboek II, pp. 159-60; Kieskamp, "De Wereld in één Land," pp. 79-80, 82. For a later period, see N. Penn, Rogues, Rebels and Runaways: Eighteenth-Century Cape Characters (Cape Town, 1999).

106 L. Nagtegaal, Riding the Dutch Tiger: The Dutch East Indies Company and the Northeast Coast of Java, 1680-1743 (Leiden, 1996), pp. 72-77, 79; M. C. Ricklefs, War, Culture and Economy in Java, 1677-1726: Asian and European Imperialism in the Early Kartasura Period (Sydney, 1993), pp. 84 et seq.; A. Kumar, ed., Surapati, Man and Legend: A Study of Three Babad Traditions (Leiden, 1976); H. J. de Graaf, De Moord op Kapitein François Tack, 8 Febr. 1686 (Amsterdam, 1935); De Haan, Oud Batavia I, pp. 442-43, 462.

107 Generale Missiven V, pp. 200, 297, 512, 671, 822; idem, pp. 161, 601, 665, 844; G. J. Knaap, ed., Memories van Overgave van Gouverneurs van Ambon in de Zeventiende en Achttiende Eeuw, Rijks Geschiedkundige Publicatiën, Kleine serie 62 (The Hague, 1987), pp. 91, 93, 251, 282-83, 289-90, 303; Valentijn, Oud en nieuw Oost-Indiën II, pp. 62-63, 229, 231, 313, 341-42, 368-69, 636, 642-43, 652, 657, 660-61, 663, 666, 672.

108 Generale Missiven IV, pp. 713, 714-15; VI, pp. 190, 238; Valentijn, Beschryvinge III, p. 15; Knaap ed., Memories van Overgave, pp. 90-91.

109 Hovy, Ceylonees Plakkaatboek I, pp. 109, 169-70, 201, 290, 399; Van Dam, Beschryvinge, p. 331.

110 Various theories have been postulated to explain why fugitive slaves were often subjected to these harsh punishments: fears that maroon activity could portend loss of control over large and potentially dangerous servile populations, reflection of colonial paranoia and racism, a major component of class exploitation, or evidence that coercion was the glue that held these fragmented societies together.

Myanmar Armed Forces  

Wikipedia Back to Top

 

Home > Library > Reference > Wikipedia Myanmar Armed Forces

Myanmar Armed Forces
Tatmadaw emblem
Military manpower
Total armed forces428,250 (Ranked 12th)
Active troops428,250 (Ranked 12th)
Total troops500,250 (Ranked 26th)
Paramilitary72,000 (Ranked 26th)
Conscription age16 years of age
Availabilitymales age 15-49: 12,211,144 (2003 est.)
Fit for military servicemales age 18-49: 6,502,013 (2005 est.)
Military expenditures
USD figure7.07 billion US $ (FY2005 est.) [1]
Percent of GDP19% (2005 est.)
Components
Myanmar ArmyArmy-flag.svg
Myanmar NavyNavy-flag.jpg
Myanmar Air ForceAirforce-flag.jpg
Myanmar Police ForceMm-police-flag.jpg
Myanmar Frontier Forces
History
Military history of Myanmar
Burma Independence Army
Burma National Army
Ranks
Army ranks and insignia of Myanmar
Navy ranks and insignia of Myanmar
Airforce ranks and insignia of Myanmar

The military of Myanmar, officially known as Tatmadaw (Burmese: တပ္‌မေတာ္‌; MLCTS: tap ma. taw; IPA: [taʔmədɔÌ]). is the primary military organisation responsible for the territorial security and defense of Union of Myanmar. The armed forces are administered by the Ministry of Defence and are composed of the Army, the Navy and the Air Force. Auxiliary services include Myanmar Police Force, People Militia Units and Frontier Forces, locally known as Na Sa Kha.

All service personnel are volunteers although the government is empowered to undertake conscription if considered necessary for Myanmar's defence. Tatmadaw has been engaged in a bitter battle with ethnic insurgents, political dissidents and narco-armies since the country gained its independence from Great Britain in 1948. Retaining much of the organizational structure established by the British, Myanmar Armed Forces continue to face challenges from aging weaponry and equipment and relying on foreign purchases of military equipment. However, the armed forces are an essential to Myanmar's strategic importance, power and capabilities in the reigon.

History

Main article: Military History of Myanmar

Defense Policy and Doctrine

Defence Policy of Myanmar Tatmadaw was formally declared in February, 1999. The declared policy outlined the doctrine of "total people's defence" for the Union of Myanmar. Threats to the national unity, territorial integrity and sovereign independence of the Union of Myanmar are the most important security objectives and considered as threats to the security of state. In the process of formulating Defence Policy and Military Doctrine from a strategic perspective, Tatmadaw has undergone three phases.

First Phase (Post Independence/Civil War era)

The first phase of the doctrine was developed in early 1950s to cope with external threats from more powerful enemies with a strategy of Strategic Denial under conventional warfare. The perception of threats to state security was more external than internal threats. The internal threat to state security was managed through the use of a mixture of force and political persuasion. Lieutenant Colonel Maung Maung drew up defence doctrine based on conventional warfare concepts, with large infantry divisions, armoured brigades, tanks and motorised war with mass mobilisation for the war effort being the important element of the doctrine. The objective was to contain the offensive of the invading forces at the border for at least three months, while waiting for the arrival of international forces, similar police action by international intervention forces under the directive of United Nations during the war on Korean peninsula. However, the conventional strategy under the concept of total war was undermined by the lack of appropriate command and control system, proper logistical support structure, sound economic bases and efficient civil defence organisations.

At the beginning of 1950s, while Tatmadaw was able to reassert its control over most part of the country, Kuomintang (KMT) troops under General Li Mai, with support from United States, invaded Myanmar and used the country's frontier as a springboard for attack against People's Republic of China, which in turn became the external threat to state security and sovereignty of Myanmar. The first phase of the doctrine was tested for the first time in Operation "Naga Naing" in February 1953 against invading KMT forces. The doctrine did not take into account logistic and political support for KMT from United States and as a result it failed to deliver the objectives and ended in humiliating defeat for the Tatmadaw. The then Tatmadaw leadership argued that the excessive media coverage was partly to blame for the failure of Operation "Naga Naing". For example, Brigadier General Maung Maung pointed out that newspapers, such as the "Nation", carried reports detailing the training and troops positioning, even went as far to the name and social background of the commanders who are leading the operation thus losing the element of surprise. Colonel Saw Myint, who was second in command for the operation, also complained about the long lines of communications and the excessive pressure imposed upon the units for public relations activities in order to prove that the support of the people was behind the operation.[1]

Second Phase (KMT Invasion/BSPP era)

Despite failure, Tatmadaw continued to rely on this doctrine until the mid 1960s. The doctrine was under constant review and modifications throughout KMT invasion and gained success in anti-KMT operations in the mid and late 1950s. However, this strategy became increasingly irrelevant and unsuitable in the late 1950s as the insurgents and KMT changed their positional warfare strategy to hit-and-run guerrilla warfare.[2][3] At the 1958 Tatmadaw's annual Commanding Officers (COs) conference, Colonel Kyi Win submitted a report outlining the requirement for new military doctrine and strategy. He stated that 'Tatmadaw did not have a clear strategy to cope with insurgents', even though most of Tatmadaw's commanders are the guerrilla fighters during the anti-British and Japanese campaigns during the Second World War, they had very little knowledge of anti-guerrilla or counterinsurgency warfare. Based upon Colonel Kyi Win's report, Tatmadaw begin developing an appropriate military doctrine and strategy to meet the requirements of counterinsurgency warfare.

This second phase of the doctrine was to suppress insurgency with people's war and the perception of threats to state security was more of internal threats. During this phase, external linkage of internal problems and direct external threats were minimised by the foreign policy based on isolation. It was common view of the commanders that unless insurgency was suppressed, foreign interference would be highly probable[4], therefore counterinsurgency became the core of the new military doctrine and strategy. Beginning in 1961, the Directorate of Military Training took charge the research for national defence planning, military doctrine and strategy for both internal and external threats. This included reviews of international and domestic political situations, studies of the potential sources of conflicts, collection of information for strategic planning and defining the possible routes of foreign invasion.[5]. In 1962, as part of new military doctrine planning, principles of anti-guerrilla warfare were outlined and counterinsurgency-training courses were delivered at the training schools. The new doctrine laid out three potential enemies and they are internal insurgents, historical enemies with roughly an equal strength (i.e. Thailand), and enemies with greater strength. It states that in suppressing insurgencies, Tatmadaw must be trained to conduct long-range penetration with a tactic of continuous search and destroy. Reconnaissance, Ambush and all weather day and night offensive and attack capabilities along with wining the hearts and minds of people are important parts of anti-guerrilla warfare. For countering an historical enemy with equal strength, Tatmadaw should fight a conventional warfare under total war strategy, without giving up an inch of its territory to the enemy. For powerful enemy and foreign invaders, Tatmadaw should engage in total people's war, with a special focus on guerrilla strategy.[6]

To prepare for the transition to the new doctrine, Brigadier General San Yu, the then Vice Chief of Staff (Army), sent a delegation led by Lieutenant Colonel Thura Tun Tin was sent to Switzerland, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia and East Germany in July 1964 to study organisation structure, armaments, training, territorial organisation and strategy of people's militias. A research team was also formed at General Staff Office within the War Office to study defence capabilities and militia formations of neighbouring countries.

The new doctrine of total people's war, and the strategy of anti-guerrilla warfare for counterinsurgency and guerrilla warfare for foreign invasion, were designed to be appropriate for Myanmar. The doctrine flowed from the country's independent and active foreign policy, total people's defence policy, the nature of perceived threats, its geography and the regional environment, the size of its population in comparison with those of its neighbours, the relatively underdeveloped nature of its economy and its historical and political experiences. The doctrine was based upon 'three totalities': population, time and space (du-thone-du) and 'four strengths': manpower, material, time and morale (panama-lay-yat). The doctrine did not develop concepts of strategic denial or counter-offensive capabilities. It relied almost totally on irregular low-intensity warfare, such as its guerrilla strategy to counter any form of foreign invasion. The overall counterinsurgency strategy included not only elimination of insurgents and their support bases with the 'four cut' strategy, but also the building and designation of 'white area' and 'black area' as well.

In April 1968, Tatmadaw introduced special warfare training programmes at "Command Training Centres" at various regional commands. Anti-Guerrilla warfare tactics were taught at combat forces schools and other training establishments with special emphasis on ambush and counter-ambush, counterinsurgency weapons and tactics, individual battle initiative for tactical independence, commando tactics, and reconnaissance. Battalion size operations were also practised in the South West Regional Military Command area. The new military doctrine was formally endorsed and adopted at the first party congress of the BSPP in 1971.[7] BSPP laid down directives for "complete annihilation of the insurgents as one of the tasks for national defence and state security" and called for "liquidation of insurgents through the strength of the working people as the immediate objective". This doctrine ensures the role of Tatmadaw at the heart of national policy making.

Throughout BSPP era, the total people's war doctrine was solely applied in counterinsurgency operations, since Myanmar did not face any direct foreign invasion throughout the period. In 1985, the then Lieutenant General Saw Maung, Vice-Chief of Staff of Tatmadaw reminded his commanders during his speech at the Command and General Staff College:

In Myanmar, out of nearly 35 million people, the combined armed forces (army, navy and air force) are about two hundred thousand. In terms of percentage, that is about 0.01 percent. It is simply impossible to defend a country the size of ours with only this handful of troops... therefore, what we have to do in the case of foreign invasion is to mobilise people in accordance with the "total people's war" doctrine. In order to defend our country from aggressors, the entire population must be involved in the war effort as the support of people dictate the outcome of the war.

Third Phase (SLORC/SPDC era)

The third phase of doctrinal development of Myanmar Armed Forces came after the military take over and formation of State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) in September, 1988 as part of armed forces modernisation programme. The development was the reflection of sensitivity towards direct foreign invasion or invasion by proxy state during the turbulent years of the late 80s and early 90s, for example: unauthorised presence of US Aircraft Carrier Group in Myanmar's territorial waters during 1988 political uprising as evidence of an infringement of Myanmar's sovereignty. Also, Tatmadaw leadership was concerned that foreign powers might arm the insurgents on the Myanmar border to exploit the political situation and tensions in the country. This new threat perception, previously insignificant under the nation's isolationist foreign policy, led Tatmadaw leaders to review the defence capability and doctrine of the Tatmadaw.

The third phase was to face the lower level external threats with a strategy of strategic denial under total people's defence concept. Current military leadership has successfully dealt with 17 major insurgent groups, whose 'return to legal fold' in the past decade has remarkably decreased the internal threats to state security, at least for the short and medium terms, even though threat perception of the possibility of external linkage to internal problems, perceived as being based on pretexts such as human rights violations, religious suppression and ethnic cleansing, remains high.

Within the policy, the role of the Tatmadaw was defined as a `modern, strong and highly capable fighting force'. Since the day of independence, the Tatmadaw has been involved in restoring and maintaining internal security and suppressing insurgency. It was with this background that Tatmadaw's "multifaceted" defence policy was formulated and it's military doctrine and strategy could be interpreted as defence-in-depth. It was influenced by a number of factors such as history, geography, culture, economy and sense of threats. Tatmadaw has developed an 'active defence' strategy based on guerrilla warfare with limited conventional military capabilities, designed to cope with low intensity conflicts from external and internal foes, which threatens the security of the state. This strategy, revealed in joint services exercises, is built on a system of total people's defence, where the armed forces provide the first line of defence and the training and leadership of the nation in the matter of national defence. It is designed to deter potential aggressors by the knowledge that defeat of Tatmadaw's regular forces in conventional warfare would be followed by persistent guerrilla warfare in the occupied areas by people militias and dispersed regular troops which would eventually wear down the invading forces, both physically and psychologically, and leave it vulnerable to a counter-offensive. If the conventional strategy of strategic denial fails, then the Tatmadaw and it's auxiliary forces will follow Mao's strategic concepts of 'strategic defensive', 'strategic stalemate' and 'strategic offensive'.

Over the past decade, through a series of modernisation programs, Tatmadaw has developed and invested in better Command, Control, Communication and Intelligence system; real-time intelligence; formidable air defence system; and early warning systems for it's 'strategic denial' and 'total people's defence' doctrine.

 

Organisational, Command and Control Structure

Before 1988[8]

Overall command of Tatmadaw (Armed Forces) rested with the country's highest ranking military officer, a General, who acted concurrently as Defence Minister and Chief of Staff of Defence Services. He thus exercised supreme operational control over all three services, under the direction of the President, State Council and Council of Ministers. There was also a National Security Council which acted in advisory capacity. The Defence Minister cum Chief-of-Staff of Defence Services exercised day-to-day control of the armed forces and assisted by three Vice-Chiefs of Staff, one each for the army, navy and air force. These officers also acted as Deputy Ministers of Defence and commanders of their respective Services. They were all based at Ministry of Defence (Kakweyay Wungyi Htana) in Rangoon/Yangon. It served as a government ministry as well as joint military operations headquarters.

The Joint Staff within the Ministry of Defence consisted of three major branches, one each for Army, Navy and Air Force, along with a number of independent departments. The Army Office had three major departments; the General (G) Staff to oversee operations, the Adjutant General's (A) Staff administration and the Quartermaster General's (Q) Staff to handle logistics. The General Staff consisted two Bureaus of Special Operations (BSO), which were created in April 1978 and June 1979 respectively. These BSO are similar to "Army Groups" in Western armies, high level staff units formed to manage different theatres of military operations. They were responsible for the overall direction and coordination of the Regional Military Commands (RMC) with BSO-1 covering Northern Command (NC), North Eastern Command (NEC), North Western Command (NWC), Western Command (WC) and Eastern Command (EC). BSO-2 responsible for South Eastern Command (SEC), South Western Command (SWC), Western Command (WC) and Central Command (CC)[9]. The Army's elite mobile Light Infantry Divisions (LID) were managed separately under a Staff Colonel. Under G Staff, there were also a number of directorates which corresponded to the Army's functional corps, such as Intelligence, Signals, Training, Armour and Artillery. The A Staff was responsible for the Adjutant General, Directorate of Medical Services and the Provost Marshal's Office. The Q Staff included the Directorates of Supply and Transport, Ordnance Services, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, and Military Engineers.

The Navy and Air Force Offices within the Ministry were headed by the Vice Chiefs of Staff for those Services. Each was supported by a staff officer at full Colonel level. All these officers were responsible for the overall management of the various naval and air bases around the country, and the broader administrative functions such as recruitment and training.

Operational Command in the field was exercised through a framework of Regional Military Commands (RMC), the boundaries of which corresponded with the country's Seven States and Seven Divisions.[10] The Regional Military Commanders, all senior army officers, usually of Brigadier General rank, were responsible for the conduct of military operations in their respective RMC areas. Depending on the size of RMC and its operational requirements, Regional Military Commanders have at their disposal 10 or more infantry battalions (Kha La Ya).

1988 to 2005

Image:2000-c2.jpg‎ Tatmadaw Command Structure as of 2000

The Tatmadaw's organisational and command structure changed dramatically changed after the military coup in 1988. In 1990, the country's most senior army officer become a Senior General (equivalent to Field Marshal rank in Western armies) and held the positions of Chairman of State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), Prime Minister and Defence Minister, as well as being appointed Commander in Chief of the Defence Services. He thus exercised both political and operational control over the entire country and armed forces. From 1989, each Service has had its own Commander in Chief and Chief of Staff. The Army C-in-C is now elevated to full General (Bo gyoke Kyii) rank and also acted as Deputy C-in-C of the Defence Services. The C-in-C of the Air Force and Navy hold the equivalent of Lieutenant General rank, while all three Service Chiefs of Staff were raised to Major General level. Chiefs of BSO, the heads of Q and A Staffs and the Director of Defence Services Intelligence (DDSI) were also elevated to Lieutenant General rank. The reorganisation of the armed forces after 1988 resulted in the upgrading by two ranks of most of the senior positions.

The Office of Strategic Studies (OSS, or Sit Mahar Byu Har Lae Lar Yae Hta-na) was formed around 1994 and charged with formulating defence policies, and planning and doctrine of the Tatmadaw. The OSS was commanded by Lt. Gen. Khin Nyunt, who is also the Director Defence Service Intelligence (DDSI). Regional Military Commands and Light Infantry Divisions were also reorganised, and LIDs are now directly answerable to Commander in Chief of the Army.

A number of new subordinate command headquarters were formed in response to the growth and reorganisation of the Army. These include Regional Operation Commands (ROC, or Da Ka Sa), which are subordinate to RMCs, and Military Operations Commands (MOC, or Sa Ka Kha), which are equivalent to Western infantry divisions. The Chief of Staff (Army) retained control of the Directorates of Signals, Armour and Artillery, Defence Industries, Security Printing, People's Militias and Psychological Warfare, and Military Engineering. A Colonel General Staff position was also created in the G staff to manage a new Directorate of Public Relations and Border Troops, Directorate of Defence Services Computers (DDSC), the Defence Services Museum and Historical Research Institute.

All RMC Commander positions were raised to the level of Major General and also serve as appointed Chairmen of the State- and Division-level Law and Order Restoration Committees. They were formally responsible for both military and civil administrative functions for their command areas. Also, three additional regional military commands were created. In early 1990, a new RMC was formed in Myanmar's north west, facing India. In 1996, the Eastern Command in Shan State was split into two RMCs, and South Eastern Command was divided to create a new RMC in country's far south coastal regions.[11]

In 1997, the SLORC was abolished and the military government created the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC). The council includes all senior military officers and commanders of the RMCs. A new Ministry of Military Affairs was established and headed by a Lieutenant General.

Current

In October of 2005, the OSS and DDSI were abolished during the purge of General Khin Nyint and military intelligence units. A new military intelligence unit called Military Affairs Security (MAS) was formed to take over the functions of the DDSI.

In early 2006, a new RMC was created in the newly formed administrative capital, Naypyidaw.

Organisational Structure

2005-c2.jpg

 

  • A.G = Adjutant General
  • V.A.G = Vice Adjutant General
  • DMS = Directorate of Medical Services
  • DR = Directorate of Resettlement
  • PMO = Provosts Marshal's Office
  • MAS = Military Affair Security (Intelligence)
  • DS = Directorate of Signal
  • DDI = Directorate of Defence Industries
  • DSP = Directorate of Security Printing
  • DPMPW = Directorate of People Militias and Psychological Warfare
  • DME = Directorate of Military Engineers
  • DAA = Directorate of Armour and Artillery
  • DSHMRI = Defence Services Historical Museum and Research Institute
  • DPRBRT = Directorate of Public Relations and Border Troops
  • DDSC = Directorate of Defence Services Computers
  • BSO = Bureau of Special Operations
  • RMC = Regional Military Command
  • LID = Light Infantry Division
  • ROC = Regional Operations Command
  • MOC = Military Operations Command
  • TOC = Tactical Operations Command
  • Q.M.G = Quarter Master General
  • V.Q.M.G = Vice Quarter Master General
  • DEME = Directorate Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
  • DST = Directorate of Supply and Transport
  • DOS = Directorate of Ordinance Services
  • Captain G.S = Captain General Staff
  • Colonel G.S = Colonel General Staff
  • J.A.G = Judge Advocate General
  • I.G = Inspector General
  • M.A.G = Military Appointment General
  • DP = Directorate of Procurement
  • CMA = Central Military Account
  • Camp Comm = Camp Commandant

Rank Structure

Myanmar Army Ranks and insignia

Main article: Army ranks and insignia of Myanmar

Myanmar Navy Ranks and insignia

Main article: Navy ranks and insignia of Myanmar

Myanmar Air Force Ranks and insignia

Main article: Airforce ranks and insignia of Myanmar

 

Components

Myanmar Army (Tamadaw Kyee)

Main article: Myanmar Army

Image:Army-flag.svg‎

The Myanmar Army has always been by far the largest Service and has always received the lion's share of Myanmar's defence budget.[12][13] It has played the most prominent part in Myanmar's struggle against the 40 or more insurgent groups since 1948 and acquired a reputation as a tough and resourceful military force. In 1981, it was described as 'probably the best [army] in Southeast Asia, apart from Vietnam's'[14]. The judgment was echoed in 1983, when another observer noted that "Myanmar's infantry is generally rated as one of the toughest, most combat seasoned in Southeast Asia"[15].

Myanmar Air Force (Tatmadaw Lei)

Main article: Myanmar Air Force

Image:Airforce-flag.jpg‎

Personnel: 15,000

The Myanmar Air Force (Tatmdaw Lei) was formed on 24 December 1947. In 1948, the order of battle for Tatmadaw Lei included 40 Oxfords, 16 Tiger Moths, 4 Austers and 3 Spitfires with a few hundred personnel.

Myanmar Navy (Tatmadaw Yay)

Main article: Myanmar Navy

Image:Navy-flag.jpg‎

Personnel: 16,000 (including two naval infantry battalions)

The Myanmar Navy was formed in 1940 and, although very small, played an active part in Allied operations against the Japanese during the Second World War.

Myanmar Police Force (Myanmar Yae Tat Phwe)

Main article: Myanmar Police Force

Image:Mm-police-flag.jpg‎

Personnel: 72,000 (including 4,500 Combat/SWAT Police)

Myanmar Police Force, formally known as The People's Police Force, was established in 1964 as independent department under Ministry of Home Affairs. It was reorganised on 1st October 1995 and informally become part of Tatmadaw. Current Director General of Myanmar Police Force is Brigadier General Khin Yi with it's headquarters at Yangon.

Myanmar Frontier Forces (Na Sa Kha)

Main article: Myanmar Frontier Forces

The Frontier Forces (Na Sa Kha) are now found on all five of Myanmar's international borders. They consist primarily of Tatmadaw personnel (including intelligence officers) assisted by members of Myanmar Police Force, Immigration and Custom officials. Its total strength is unknown.

Military Intelligence

Main article: Military Intelligence of Myanmar

Defence Industries

The Myanmar Defence Industries (DI) is the lifeline of Myanmar armed forces. Mainly the DI consists of 13 major factories throughout the country that produce approximately 70 major products for Army, Navy and Air Force. The main products include automatic rifles, machine guns, sub-machine guns, anti-aircraft guns, complete range of mortar and artillery ammunitions, aircraft and anti aircraft ammunitions, tank and anti-tank ammunitions, bombs, grenades, anti-tank mines, pyrotechnics, commercial explosives and commercial products, and rockets and so forth.DI have produced new assault rifles and light machine-guns for the infantry. The MA series of weapons were designed to replace the old German-designed but locally manufactured Heckler and Koch G3s and G4s that equipped Myanmar's army since the 1960s. DI said to be the most modern defence industries in the South East Asia region. They employ some of the latest state of the art technologies, including computerised numerical-controlled (CNC) machines and flexible manufacturing systems for production of precision components.

Factories

The major factories of the DI are the following:

  • Weapons Factory
  • Bombs & Grenades Factory
  • Tungsten Carbide Factory
  • Machine Gun Factory
  • Filling Factory
  • Propellants Factory
  • Heavy Artillery Ammo Factory
  • Small Arms Ammo Factory
  • Brass Mills
  • Tungsten Alloy Factory
  • Tank Ammo Factory
  • Explosives Factory
  • Medium Artillery Ammo Factory

Heavy Industries

Heavy Industries were established with Ukraine assistance mainly to assemble the BTR 3U fleet of the Myanmar Army. Total of 1,000 BTR-3U wheeled APCs are to be assembled in Myanmar over the next 10 years from parts sent by Ukraine. The BTR-3U is fitted with a number of modern weapon systems including 30mm gun, 7.62mm coaxial machine gun, 30mm automatic grenade launcher and anti-tank guided weapons. HI has also built APC/IFV such as MAV 1, MAV 2 and BAAC APCs. Little is known about MAV infantry fighting vehicles but it appeared that only 60% of the components are produced locally and some vital components such as fire control systems, turrets, engines and transmissions are imported from China NORINCO industries. Apart from BTR 3Us, MAVs and BAACs, HI is also producing a number of military trucks and jeeps for the Army, Navy and Air Force.

Products

Products of DI are as follow:-

  • BTR3U (180 nos/yr)
  • MAV-1 IFV (20 nos/yr)
  • Heavy Truck (400 nos/yr)
  • 4x4 6 tons truck (400 nos/yr)
  • Humvee (prototypes)(first seen in the 61st Armed Forces Day Parade)
  • 105 mm Howitzers (production started in 2006 with the help of Singaporean technicians)
  • 120 mm mortar MA 6 (50 nos/yr)
  • 14.5 mm AAA (50 nos/yr)
  • 12.7 mm HMG (200 nos/yr)
  • 0.5" HMG (150 nos/yr)
  • MA series small arms (60000 nos/yr)
  • RPG (1500 nos/yr)
  • Grenade Launcher (7000 nos/yr)
  • 81/60 mm mortars (1200 nos/yr)
  • 155/130/122/105 mm ammunitions
  • 120/81/60 mm mortar bombs
  • small arms ammunitions (60 millions nos/yr)
  • grenades/rockets
  • 57/77/122 mm rockets and up to 500 kg dumb bombs for Air Force
  • 25/37/40/57 mm ammunitions for navy

References

  1. ^ DSHMRI Archives
  2. ^ Aung San Thuriya Hla Thaung (Armanthit Sarpay, Yangon, 1999)
  3. ^ In Defiance of the Storm (Myawaddy Press, Yangon, 1997
  4. ^ Strategic Cultures in Asia-Pacific Region (St. Martin's Press)
  5. ^ DSHMRI Archives
  6. ^ DSHMRI Archives
  7. ^ DSHMRI
  8. ^ Andrew Selth: Transforming the Tatmadaw
  9. ^ Maung Aung Myoe: Building the Tatmadaw, p.26
  10. ^ See order of battle for further details
  11. ^ see Order of Battle for further details
  12. ^ Working Papers - Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, ANU
  13. ^ Andrew Selth: Power Without Glory
  14. ^ Far Eastern Economic Review, 20 May 1981
  15. ^ Far Eastern Economic Review, 7 July 1983

See also

External links


 

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)

Donate to Wikimedia

All Military Records ®
Find any Military Record in 1 Min. Using The Database of Government!
Gov-Records.com
Military Singles - Pics
Official Site. All Public Welcome. Over 2 Million profiles. Join free.
USMilitarySingles.com
Myanmar
Visiting Myanmar? Find Deals & Read Hotel Reviews!
www.TripAdvisor.com
Armed Forces Coins
Custom Designed for Your Unit. Quality from Start to Finish.
nwtMint.com
Military Gear and Apparel
Wide Variety & Selection of Quality Military Clothing and Accessories
militarysearch.usptgear.com

 

This page is presented for the following searches:  What is Myanmar Armed Forces; Military of Myanmar; Burma/Military; Myanmar Military; Myanmar/Military; Tatmadaw

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                

Smile My Website has currently published on my site as aralanland.com, a volunteer website as non commercial purposes, is provided by Mysite.com is an United Online web service, United Online, inc., headquartered in Woodland Hill, CA in United States of America Smile